I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability
against Russia, not to defend anything.
That's why we are meddling in'WE' being Vladimir Putin and who else?
Ukraine.
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE ENTERTAIN BOZO FOR A WHILE.
Thank you.
John Doe wrote:
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability
Huh? Most NATO countries aren't known for 'first strike' activity. Do
you know something about Belgium that I don't? And Canada?
whit3rd wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability
Huh? Most NATO countries aren't known for 'first strike' activity. Do
you know something about Belgium that I don't? And Canada?
This is the first result on Google for (first strike capability)...
"the ability to use nuclear missiles in an opening attack calculated to destroy the enemy's nuclear weapons"
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1211:b0:2e0:5648:a053 with SMTP id y17-20020a05622a121100b002e05648a053mr8069321qtx.267.1646634023888; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 22:20:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:dec2:0:b0:61d:e09e:94d1 with SMTP id v185-20020a25dec2000000b0061de09e94d1mr6906592ybg.287.1646634023748; Sun, 06 Mar 2022 22:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 22:20:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <t040tg$g8c$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me> <ee58521c-0ea6-4b24-8a02-1b772e979165n@googlegroups.com> <t040tg$g8c$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <313fdb34-271a-495a-ad90-8501ea0ba90fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: OT: What is NATO for?
From: whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 06:20:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 19
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662210
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 8:15:54 PM UTC-8, John Doe wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >> >Huh? Most NATO countries aren't known for 'first strike' activity. Do
you know something about Belgium that I don't? And Canada?
This is the first result on Google for (first strike capability)...
"the ability to use nuclear missiles in an opening attack calculated to
destroy the enemy's nuclear weapons"
Irrelevant to the intentions of Belgium, Canada, and other members of
NATO. It's also not a capability NATO has, unless there's some vulnerability I don't know of, regarding Typhoon class submarines
inherited from the USSR. Why would one think NATO's "only reason" is
a capability that hasn't been seen during over half a century?
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx06.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OT: What is NATO for?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me> <ee58521c-0ea6-4b24-8a02-1b772e979165n@googlegroups.com> <t040tg$g8c$2@dont-email.me> <313fdb34-271a-495a-ad90-8501ea0ba90fn@googlegroups.com> <t049bj$1bc$1@dont-email.me>
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <ntiVJ.100127$X81.71379@usenetxs.com>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:27:15 UTC
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:27:15 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1495
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662213 free.spam:17410
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 7 Mar 2022 06:39:47 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t049bj$1bc$1@dont-email.me>.
This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even follow it's own rules that it uses to troll other posters.
WTQBtqRLMsYm
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >Ukraine.
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >Ukraine.Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
On 3/6/2022 10:00 PM, John Doe wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its
infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the
ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to
preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability
against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in
Ukraine.
NATO is for cheer-leading the invasion of 3rd world countries by a
superpower called the USA, based on whatever flimsy pretexts the USA
dreams up, but then freaking out when a different superpower does the
same to a country in its own backyard. Oh shit!
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe ><always.look@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >>Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >> <alway...@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>> infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>> whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now. >>>
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>> ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>> they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in
Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >> <always.look@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its
infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the
ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in
Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying
on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have
the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our
friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power
is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but
to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are >>meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified
as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we
do not want any commies here!" I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some
called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated
in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass destruction
according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At the start of the
Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the
extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >><always.look@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>>infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>>whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>>ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>>they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>>is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>>preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>>against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >>>Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >>> <always.look@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>>> infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>>> whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now. >>>>
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>>> ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>>> they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in
Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be >entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:34:22 AM UTC-5, bitrex wrote:
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan PanteltjeNATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >>>> <alway...@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>>>> infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>>>> whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now. >>>>>
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>>>> ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>>>> they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>>>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>>>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>>>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >>>>> Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be
entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
Yes, that's why Putin is so fearful of having a NATO country next door, it would make Russia look weak through association.
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be
entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
Yes, that's why Putin is so fearful of having a NATO country next
door, it would make Russia look weak through association.
Post Soviet Union the Russian oligarchs (of which Putin is one of the biggest) has tended to view NATO as just a tool of US oligarchs e.g. the Bushes, the Clintons, and we-will-coup-anyone-we-want! Elon Musk:
<https://twitter.com/panoparker/status/1318157559266762752?lang=en>
On 09:06 7 Mar 2022, Jan Panteltje said:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying
on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have
the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our
friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power
is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but
to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are >>>meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified
as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we
do not want any commies here!" I replied "commies are also people"
So empathy is not one of your strengths.
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some
called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated
in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass destruction
according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At the start of the
Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the
extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
You sound like Cordelia in Shakespeare's King Lear. She couldn't stop >shooting her mouth off in the name of "honesty" and plain speaking. It
ended up very, very badly.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:34:10 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe >>>> <always.look@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>>>> infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>>>> whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now. >>>>>
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>>>> ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>>>> they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>>>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>>>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>>>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >>>>> Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
has-been for about 30 years.
Until Russia dreamed of empire again.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be
entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
Worse than useless.
On 3/7/2022 11:36 AM, Rick C wrote:
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:34:22 AM UTC-5, bitrex wrote:
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan PanteltjeNATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe
<alway...@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its >>>>> infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the >>>>> whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now. >>>>>
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the >>>>> ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If >>>>> they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to
preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability
against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in >>>>> Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some general,
he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!"
I replied "commies are also people"
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example participated in the attack on Iraq
(filled with weapons of mass destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated about all the extra
sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later find a stronger predator.
You 'merricans are all a pawn in their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are alive.
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be
entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
Yes, that's why Putin is so fearful of having a NATO country next door, it would make Russia look weak through association.
Post Soviet Union the Russian oligarchs (of which Putin is one of the biggest) has tended to view NATO as just a tool of US oligarchs e.g. the Bushes, the Clintons, and we-will-coup-anyone-we-want! Elon Musk:
<https://twitter.com/panoparker/status/1318157559266762752?lang=en>
to use as a door-knocker to bang on their front door (contrary to
promises by Bush 1 administration et al that NATO wouldn't move
eastwards), and in that at least they weren't far off the mark.
The idea that Russia was unprovoked is as dumb as Putin's apparent
belief that regular Ukrainians would want him up their ass any more than
they particularly wanted NATO, at least until post-Crimea when they
started to view it as a least-worst option.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:34:10 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in <t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a has-been for about 30 years.
Until Russia dreamed of empire again.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to be entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
Worse than useless.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: What is NATO for?
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:55:10 GMT
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <t052ru$3h7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me> <8OeVJ.120890$z688.78237@fx35.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 13:55:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2b1798f2aa5f58e5d7cee986e365077d"; logging-data="3623"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Juz9o8cmo5HVBn07BxYG8InlFjmV3LIw="
User-Agent: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-2.6.37.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u9C71N95w61NzUWOhIau9gDTLjI=
X-Newsreader-location: NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (c) 'LIGHTSPEED' off line news reader for the Linux platform NewsFleX homepage: http://www.panteltje.com/panteltje/newsflex/ and ftp download ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/news/readers/
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662235
On a sunny day (Sun, 6 Mar 2022 22:16:20 -0500) it happened bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in <8OeVJ.120890$z688.78237@fx35.iad>:
On 3/6/2022 10:00 PM, John Doe wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its
infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the
ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia >>> is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to >>> preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability >>> against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in
Ukraine.
NATO is for cheer-leading the invasion of 3rd world countries by a >>superpower called the USA, based on whatever flimsy pretexts the USA
dreams up, but then freaking out when a different superpower does the
same to a country in its own backyard. Oh shit!
+1
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.freedyn.de!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OT: What is NATO for?
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me> <8OeVJ.120890$z688.78237@fx35.iad> <t052ru$3h7$1@dont-email.me> <t06fk8$ah6$3@dont-email.me>
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <KozVJ.77993$8b1.54069@usenetxs.com>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 02:42:50 UTC
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 02:42:50 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1498
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662298 free.spam:17422
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Tue, 8 Mar 2022 02:39:04 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t06fk8$ah6$3@dont-email.me>).
This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
uerXWDTs055H
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
NATO welcomes Georgia's and Ukraine's aspirations for membership
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
This incident is proving that English is all we need. Everybody is trying to speak English, most are doing well, I'm not criticizing any of them. I'm thrilled.
There are a few exceptions, like the rabid anti-American "Jan Panteltje" from
a racist, slave trading, child molesting country (Holland).
A country changing its name won't erase its pathetic history.
WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE ENTERTAIN BOZO FOR A WHILE...
The problem is Western meddling in former Russian territories.
This is from NATO's website...
NATO welcomes Georgia's and Ukraine's aspirations for membership
It's not about defense, it's about establishing a first strike capability.
I wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the whole freaking Earth.
That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world.
Nobody will attack our friends.
If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in the Ukraine.
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe?
We
have the ability to destroy the whole world.
Nobody will attack
our friends.
If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
On 3/6/2022 10:00 PM, John Doe wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
NATO is for cheer-leading the invasion of 3rd world countries by a
superpower called the USA, based on whatever flimsy pretexts the
USA dreams up, but then freaking out when a different superpower
does the same to a country in its own backyard. Oh shit!
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who
identified as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje
you know we do not want any commies here!" I replied "commies are
also people" That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways
(some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force,
for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At
the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics,
they were
elated about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or later
find a stronger predator. You 'merricans are all a pawn in their
game,
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 4:06:24 AM UTC-5, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry wasAround 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack
anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who
identified as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr
Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!" I replied
"commies are also people" That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways
(some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At
the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were
elated about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or
later find a stronger predator. You 'merricans are all a pawn in
their game,
You are such a silly boy.
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it
happened John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia
is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack
anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why
we are meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who
identified as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr
Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!" I replied
"commies are also people" That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways
(some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state).
At the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they
were elated about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
Its a free world, Military Industrial Complex will sooner or
later find a stronger predator. You 'merricans are all a pawn in
their game,
and you aren't speaking either German or Russian. And you are
alive.
NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been a
has-been for about 30 years.
Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN to
be entirely useless, though.
Only next-to-useless.
On 09:06 7 Mar 2022, Jan Panteltje said:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who
identified as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr
Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!" I replied
"commies are also people"
So empathy is not one of your strengths.
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways
(some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At
the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were
elated about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
You sound like Cordelia in Shakespeare's King Lear. She couldn't
stop shooting her mouth off in the name of "honesty" and plain
speaking. It ended up very, very badly.
I think you could turn the UN building into affordable housing and
really improve the quality of life in Manhattan a lot
On a sunny day (Mon, 07 Mar 2022 16:53:16 GMT) it happened Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote in <XnsAE53ABCB3BD8B37B93@144.76.35.252>:
On 09:06 7 Mar 2022, Jan Panteltje said:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it
happened John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is >>>>relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack
anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike >>>>capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands
Was already designing things for army and navy here back then.
All went well until I got an interview with somebody who
identified as some general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr
Panteltje you know we do not want any commies here!" I replied
"commies are also people"
So empathy is not one of your strengths.
That was the end of that.
Went to work for the national TV network, more my thing anyways
(some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO,
completely nuts if you ask me.
NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At
the start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were
elated about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised.
I gave my opinion and left (was offered a contract).
You sound like Cordelia in Shakespeare's King Lear. She couldn't
stop shooting her mouth off in the name of "honesty" and plain
speaking. It ended up very, very badly.
Is that a threat name shifter?
As soon as your diapers are dry come back in the world of real
people. Maybe old wimin cannot fight like a man
:-)
LOL
On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 4:14:46 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:34:10 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net>n Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in
wrote:
On 3/7/2022 10:37 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:06:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it
happened Joh
<t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me>:
een for about 30 years.NATO wasn't always tits-on-a-bull, but it's a has-been. Has been
a has-b
NATO forces have down useful stuff in and around Europe in the
past thirty years. American newspapers haven't made much fuss
about it.
Until Russia dreamed of empire again.
Politicians always dream of empire.
tirely useless, though.Unlike my erudite right-wing associates I don't consider the UN
to be en
Worse than useless.
Only next-to-useless.
By which John Larkin means that right-wing US politicians who want
to use it to bully other countries into doing what they want done
haven't been able to exploit it in that role, and have had endure
the impertinence of being told that they were out of order.
The rest of the world rather values that.
The problem is Western meddling in former Russian territories.
This is from NATO's website...
NATO welcomes Georgia's and Ukraine's aspirations for membership
It's not about defense, it's about establishing a first strike
capability.
I wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was
in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers
can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Post Soviet Union the Russian oligarchs (of which Putin is one of
the biggest)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!5U2ooNuM5UP0Ynf/GmOnCg.user.46.165.242.91.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: What is NATO for?
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:36:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t06thq$1okq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="58010"; posting-host="5U2ooNuM5UP0Ynf/GmOnCg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:662329
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Oh boy! An utter idiot with no clue what the word DETERRENCE
means. You must have been jacking off for the last 60 years.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe?
You not knowing is proof you never did and likely never will
understand what is going on in the world.
We
have the ability to destroy the whole world.
No shit, Schleprock.
Nobody will attack
our friends.
You must still have your head up Trump's fat ass. WAKE UP.
That is exactly what IS taking place.
If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
I said yesterday that we should. Right onto the Kremlin.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
You are so wrong. You have to pull your head out of Trump's ass
and stop watching Fucktard Faux Nonnews.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Then we should give one to Ukraine and let them destroy Moscow, and
one existence invading asshole will no longer exist.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Wrong again. NATO is about defense. OUR strike capacity comes
from having airbases in the nations of our allies, distinctly
separate from NATO and their mission.
You really ain't that bright. Man you should run over and marry
Jan Pan the Nederlander totla retard. You guys are meant for each
other.
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote in news:t03sfp$lis$1...@dont-email.me:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Oh boy! An utter idiot with no clue what the word DETERRENCE means. You must have been jacking off for the last 60 years.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe?
You not knowing is proof you never did and likely never will understand what is going on in the world.
We have the ability to destroy the whole world.
No shit, Schleprock.
Nobody will attack our friends.
You must still have your head up Trump's fat ass. WAKE UP.
That is exactly what IS taking place.
If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
I said yesterday that we should. Right onto the Kremlin.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
You are so wrong. You have to pull your head out of Trump's ass and stop watching Fucktard Faux Nonnews.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Then we should give one to Ukraine and let them destroy Moscow, and one existence invading asshole will no longer exist.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
Wrong again. NATO is about defense. OUR strike capacity comes from having airbases in the nations of our allies, distinctly separate from NATO and their mission.
You really ain't that bright. Man you should run over and marry
Jan Panteltje the Nederlander total retard. You guys are meant for each other.
Always Wrong is off its meds again...
The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the
whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If
they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia
is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
John Doe <alway...@message.header> wrote:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them. That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we are meddling in Ukraine.
This is the problem with NATO expansion.
https://youtu.be/oKV_utFLXrw?t=305 (about 3 minutes worth)
That retired Lieutenant Colonel explains why Russia can do without an organization like NATO.
He points out that Russia plans to repel NATO with tactical nukes.
The only recourse would be to use nukes in return and start World War III. Then we all lose, not just Russia.
But of course there are some suicidal people in the world. Seems like lots!
On a sunny day (Mon, 07 Mar 2022 16:53:16 GMT) it happened Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote in <XnsAE53ABCB3BD8B37B93@144.76.35.252>:
On 09:06 7 Mar 2022, Jan Panteltje said:
On a sunny day (Mon, 7 Mar 2022 03:00:10 -0000 (UTC)) it happened
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
<t03sfp$lis$1@dont-email.me>:
I suppose at the time NATO was established nuclear weaponry was in
its infancy. In any case, nowadays, all of the major powers can
destroy the whole freaking Earth. That's the power Russia is
relying on right now.
Why do we (America) even need to be part of NATO in Europe? We
have the ability to destroy the whole world. Nobody will attack
our friends. If they did, we could lob a "small" nuke on them.
That power is what Russia is threatening right now.
None of the major powers, no country at all, will attack anything
but to preserve its own existence.
Seems the only reason for NATO is to establish a first strike
capability against Russia, not to defend anything. That's why we
are meddling in Ukraine.
Around 1968 I applied for a job at NATO in the Netherlands Was
already designing things for army and navy here back then. All went
well until I got an interview with somebody who identified as some
general, he looked at me and sad: "Mr Panteltje you know we do not
want any commies here!" I replied "commies are also people"
So empathy is not one of your strengths.
That was the end of that. Went to work for the national TV network,
more my thing anyways (some called them all leftists of course ;-).
But it showed the 'mind-set' in NATO, completely nuts if you ask
me. NATO has been, ever since, an attack force, for example
participated in the attack on Iraq (filled with weapons of mass
destruction according to Bush blah blah lies -> deep state). At the
start of the Iraq war I was working at Tectronics, they were elated
about all the extra sales the Iraq war promised. I gave my opinion
and left (was offered a contract).
You sound like Cordelia in Shakespeare's King Lear. She couldn't
stop shooting her mouth off in the name of "honesty" and plain
speaking. It ended up very, very badly.
Is that a threat name shifter? As soon as your diapers are dry come
back in the world of real people. Maybe old wimin cannot fight like a
man
:-)
LOL
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 183 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 15:27:16 |
| Calls: | 3,594 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 11,139 |
| Messages: | 3,441,065 |