I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free SuperchargingFor a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
fredag den 11. februar 2022 kl. 02.30.49 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.if you think running over people or blowing up truckers is ok, you must not be very good with common sense either
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-running-over-protesters-blo-idUSKBN23B39U
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 9:07:23 PM UTC-5, dean...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
But how much good are truckers if they block roads instead of hauling goods over them?- Get 1,000 miles of free SuperchargingFor a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
--
Rick C.
+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:36:12 PM UTC-5, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:to an Oklahoma law that was recently passed by the state legislature, which also provides protections for drivers who use their vehicles to harm groups exercising their First Amendment rights of speech and assembly."
fredag den 11. februar 2022 kl. 02.30.49 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.if you think running over people or blowing up truckers is ok, you must not be very good with common sense either
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-running-over-protesters-blo-idUSKBN23B39UYour reading of my post would seem to show a lack of comprehension. Where did I say anything about it being ok with *me* to "blow up" truckers' rigs??? I'm asking about the law.
"Under the law’s provisions, those driving on a road or highway while a protest is occurring are granted civil immunity protections if they drive their vehicles into the crowd, causing harm to those taking part in the demonstration. This is similar
So there are states where it seems to be ok in at least a civil sense to run over protesters.to an Oklahoma law that was recently passed by the state legislature, which also provides protections for drivers who use their vehicles to harm groups exercising their First Amendment rights of speech and assembly."
"Under the law’s provisions, those driving on a road or highway while a protest is occurring are granted civil immunity protections if they drive their vehicles into the crowd, causing harm to those taking part in the demonstration. This is similar
https://truthout.org/articles/desantis-signs-bill-giving-vehicle-drivers-civil-protections-to-hit-protesters/
Or perhaps this web site is misinterpreting the laws in those two states? I'm willing to bet those laws are not Constitutional and would be struck down in an appropriate case.
So maybe it is not "ok" to blow up truckers' rigs, but clearly it would be "ok" to run them over once outside their vehicles. That's the law in Florida!
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should
be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut
down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
fredag den 11. februar 2022 kl. 03.28.43 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:to an Oklahoma law that was recently passed by the state legislature, which also provides protections for drivers who use their vehicles to harm groups exercising their First Amendment rights of speech and assembly."
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:36:12 PM UTC-5, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 11. februar 2022 kl. 02.30.49 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.if you think running over people or blowing up truckers is ok, you must not be very good with common sense either
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-running-over-protesters-blo-idUSKBN23B39UYour reading of my post would seem to show a lack of comprehension. Where did I say anything about it being ok with *me* to "blow up" truckers' rigs??? I'm asking about the law.
"Under the law’s provisions, those driving on a road or highway while a protest is occurring are granted civil immunity protections if they drive their vehicles into the crowd, causing harm to those taking part in the demonstration. This is similar
to an Oklahoma law that was recently passed by the state legislature, which also provides protections for drivers who use their vehicles to harm groups exercising their First Amendment rights of speech and assembly."So there are states where it seems to be ok in at least a civil sense to run over protesters.
"Under the law’s provisions, those driving on a road or highway while a protest is occurring are granted civil immunity protections if they drive their vehicles into the crowd, causing harm to those taking part in the demonstration. This is similar
https://truthout.org/articles/desantis-signs-bill-giving-vehicle-drivers-civil-protections-to-hit-protesters/
Or perhaps this web site is misinterpreting the laws in those two states? I'm willing to bet those laws are not Constitutional and would be struck down in an appropriate case.
So maybe it is not "ok" to blow up truckers' rigs, but clearly it would be "ok" to run them over once outside their vehicles. That's the law in Florida!
the passage from the Oklahoma law:
"
1. The injury or death of the individual occurred while the
motor vehicle operator was fleeing from a riot, as defined in
Section 1311 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, under a
reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor
vehicle operator from serious injury or death; and
2. The motor vehicle operator exercised due care at the time of
the death or injury.
"
I can't find the Florida law but I suspect it is similar
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems a bit drastic. It should be simple enough to arrest the truckers
and drive the trucks away. If this is not happening, it must be a
political decision.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman <dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and starve in the dark.
Let them eat masks.
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.I very much doubt that is the case.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
Let them eat masks.
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 12:15:33 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:essential people don't like trade unions, for fairly obvious reasons, and they are rather more influential in American than in more egalitarian countries (which is most of the rest of the advanced industrial world).
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and starve in the dark.
Some of the trucker might stay home, but there will be enough scab truckers to keep the food flowing.
Let them eat masks.
Marie Antoinette was a little more realistic.
https://www.britannica.com/story/did-marie-antoinette-really-say-let-them-eat-cake
John Larkin hasn't noticed that modern society is remarkably complicated, and all sorts of people could withdraw their labour and let the urban elites freeze and starve in the dark. The trade union movement depends on it. The people who pay all these
The negotiations in the US are a trifle less well organised in consequence.
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nomThe truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:55:36 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary,
it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to
block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not
of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
Not when they are blocking highways. John Larkin's grasp of
practical reality isn't all that firm.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze
and starve in the dark.
Let them eat masks.
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways.
I very much doubt that is the case.
Sylvia.
On 2/11/2022 10:25 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 12:15:33 AM UTC+11,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run
over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By
corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they
are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but
not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites
freeze and starve in the dark.
Some of the trucker might stay home, but there will be enough
scab truckers to keep the food flowing.
Let them eat masks.
Marie Antoinette was a little more realistic.
https://www.britannica.com/story/did-marie-antoinette-really-say-l
et-them-eat-cake
John Larkin hasn't noticed that modern society is remarkably
complicated, and all sorts of people could withdraw their labour
and let the urban elites freeze and starve in the dark. The trade
union movement depends on it. The people who pay all these
essential people don't like trade unions, for fairly obvious
reasons, and they are rather more influential in American than in
more egalitarian countries (which is most of the rest of the
advanced industrial world).
The negotiations in the US are a trifle less well organised in
consequence.
Only people who seem to been freezing in the dark lately was in
Texas and Virginia, probably not the "urban elites" Mr. Larkin is
talking about.
Received almost three feet of snow around here a couple weeks ago,
the lights didn't even flicker. It wasn't always that way but I
think they've been doing a better job maintaining the trees near
the lines lately
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:34:36 AM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:pursue a given event. Consider the Arbery case where prosecution was deferred until the video leaked out.
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.I very much doubt that is the case.
You have not kept up with your news. DeSantis made a bit of a splash some months ago when this bill was signed into law. It prevents civil liability in such a case. Criminal prosecution is always contingent on the willingness of prosecutors to
The law preventing civil liability in Florida has opened the door to extremely violent actions without consequence.
On 12-Feb-22 4:56 am, Rick C wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:34:36 AM UTC-5, Sylvia Else
wrote:
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run overI very much doubt that is the case.
protesters if they are blocking major highways.
You have not kept up with your news. DeSantis made a bit of a
splash some months ago when this bill was signed into law. It
prevents civil liability in such a case. Criminal prosecution is
always contingent on the willingness of prosecutors to pursue a
given event. Consider the Arbery case where prosecution was
deferred until the video leaked out.
The law preventing civil liability in Florida has opened the door
to extremely violent actions without consequence.
There is a limitation on civil liability in respect of damages
suffered by a person during a riot if they have been convicted of
riot. That is hardly carte blanc for mowing down protesters on a
highway.
Sylvia.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
(but plasma TVs?)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
On 11/02/22 20:18, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over >>>>>>>> protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it >>>>>>>> should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block >>>>>>>> roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
        For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers
but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and >>>> starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
Can the people being transported to hospitals in
ambulances ignore being delayed by minutes?
On 12-Feb-22 4:56 am, Rick C wrote:a given event. Consider the Arbery case where prosecution was deferred until the video leaked out.
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:34:36 AM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.I very much doubt that is the case.
You have not kept up with your news. DeSantis made a bit of a splash some months ago when this bill was signed into law. It prevents civil liability in such a case. Criminal prosecution is always contingent on the willingness of prosecutors to pursue
The law preventing civil liability in Florida has opened the door to extremely violent actions without consequence.
There is a limitation on civil liability in respect of damages suffered
by a person during a riot if they have been convicted of riot. That is hardly carte blanc for mowing down protesters on a highway.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and
starve in the dark.
Let them eat masks.
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute", as said by a
true patriot, Robert Goodloe Harper from Maryland!
The US will never cave in to terrorists or extortionists.
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 8:15:33 AM UTC-5, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman <dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and starve in the dark.
Let them eat masks.
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute", as said by a true patriot, Robert Goodloe Harper from Maryland!
The US will never cave in to terrorists or extortionists.
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:18:25 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:a given event. Consider the Arbery case where prosecution was deferred until the video leaked out.
On 12-Feb-22 4:56 am, Rick C wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:34:36 AM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.I very much doubt that is the case.
You have not kept up with your news. DeSantis made a bit of a splash some months ago when this bill was signed into law. It prevents civil liability in such a case. Criminal prosecution is always contingent on the willingness of prosecutors to pursue
There is a limitation on civil liability in respect of damages suffered
The law preventing civil liability in Florida has opened the door to extremely violent actions without consequence.
by a person during a riot if they have been convicted of riot. That is
hardly carte blanc for mowing down protesters on a highway.
I think you miss the point. It is a means of encouraging such behavior. Those who would even consider such and act *will* see this as indicating carte blanc.
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:(but plasma TVs?)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
Breitbart? Excellent? John Larkin seems to be a Cursitor Doom level sucker for right-wing propaganda of the more moronic kind.
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist, actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer, influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just fine."
On 2/11/22 17:45, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 11/02/22 20:18, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over >>>>>>>>> protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it >>>>>>>>> should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block >>>>>>>>> roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers >>>>>>>> but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and >>>>> starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
Can the people being transported to hospitals in
ambulances ignore being delayed by minutes?
If truckers had the power to starve anyone en masse in the US you'd
think they would've used it to get themselves higher wages by now but
that's not what happened, average adjusted-for-inflation wages have only
gone down over the past 30 years.
On 12/02/22 03:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:(but plasma TVs?)
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
Breitbart? Excellent? John Larkin seems to be a Cursitor Doom level sucker >> for right-wing propaganda of the more moronic kind.
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist,
actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer,
influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who
doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just fine."
Not /all/ authors, of course.
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
On 12-Feb-22 4:40 pm, Rick C wrote:pursue a given event. Consider the Arbery case where prosecution was deferred until the video leaked out.
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:18:25 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 12-Feb-22 4:56 am, Rick C wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 6:34:36 AM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 11-Feb-22 12:30 pm, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways.I very much doubt that is the case.
You have not kept up with your news. DeSantis made a bit of a splash some months ago when this bill was signed into law. It prevents civil liability in such a case. Criminal prosecution is always contingent on the willingness of prosecutors to
There is a limitation on civil liability in respect of damages suffered >> by a person during a riot if they have been convicted of riot. That is
The law preventing civil liability in Florida has opened the door to extremely violent actions without consequence.
hardly carte blanc for mowing down protesters on a highway.
I think you miss the point. It is a means of encouraging such behavior. Those who would even consider such and act *will* see this as indicating carte blanc.
Then they'll find themselves in some considerable strife. The
legislation does not so much as even suggest that it limits criminal liability.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:33:32 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 12/02/22 03:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin(but plasma TVs?)
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
Breitbart? Excellent? John Larkin seems to be a Cursitor Doom level sucker
for right-wing propaganda of the more moronic kind.
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist, >> actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer,
influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who >> doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just fine."
Not /all/ authors, of course.
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has beenYou would starve to death without a lot of "anti-intellectuals" to
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
grow and ship your food. I suspect that Asimov would have too.
Democracy means that people agree that they are not superior to
everyone else; that people have differing opinions and different
talents and common rights. Asimov states above that he is superior. He
wrote corny juvenile fiction. He didn't feed anyone.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:33:32 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 12/02/22 03:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >>>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin(but plasma TVs?)
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
Breitbart? Excellent? John Larkin seems to be a Cursitor Doom level sucker >>> for right-wing propaganda of the more moronic kind.
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist, >>> actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer,
influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who
doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just fine."
Not /all/ authors, of course.
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
You would starve to death without a lot of "anti-intellectuals" to
grow and ship your food. I suspect that Asimov would have too.
Democracy means that people agree that they are not superior to
everyone else;
that people have differing opinions and different
talents and common rights. Asimov states above that he is superior.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:33:32 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
You would starve to death without a lot of "anti-intellectuals" to
grow and ship your food. I suspect that Asimov would have too.
Besides, we don't live in a democracy.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:33:32 +0000, Tom Gardner<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 12/02/22 03:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman <dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, > gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist, >> actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer,
influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who >> doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just fine."
Not /all/ authors, of course.
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has beenYou would starve to death without a lot of "anti-intellectuals" to
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
grow and ship your food. I suspect that Asimov would have too.
Democracy means that people agree that they are not superior to
everyone else; that people have differing opinions and different
talents and common rights. Asimov states above that he is superior. He
wrote corny juvenile fiction. He didn't feed anyone.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 23:56:08 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/22 17:45, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 11/02/22 20:18, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman <dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
If truckers had the power to starve anyone en masse in the US you'd
think they would've used it to get themselves higher wages by now but >that's not what happened, average adjusted-for-inflation wages have only >gone down over the past 30 years.
Open borders furnish cheap labor.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and >>>> starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
(but plasma TVs?)
On 2/11/22 16:18, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<deanh6929@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over >>>>>>>>> protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, >>>>>>>>> it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to >>>>>>>>> block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
        For a practical matter, there's a shortage of truckers
but not of protesters.
Another minor practical matter is that truckers keep us alive.
When blocking roads, truckers (and others) kill people.
The truckers should just stay home and let the urban elites freeze and >>>>> starve in the dark.
And pay their bills how - via America's excellent social welfare
programs for people who don't wanna work?
Let them eat masks.
Om nom nom
The truckers can ignore their bills for a few months. Can the
urbanites ignore their hunger for a few months?
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
(but plasma TVs?)
"Anyone familiar with my scribbling knows that I separate modern society
into two categories: World Turners and The Useless."
A famous German wrote a book on the same topic it was called "Mein
Kampf" I wonder if the Breitbart editor has read it.
On 12/02/22 14:13, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 10:33:32 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 12/02/22 03:09, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, February 12, 2022 at 8:18:28 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:18:39 -0800, John Larkin(but plasma TVs?)
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:45:17 -0500, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2/11/2022 8:15 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:03:25 +0000, Tom Gardner
<spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
On 11/02/22 04:55, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:07:14 -0800 (PST), Dean Hoffman
<dean...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 7:30:49 PM UTC-6,
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent rant:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/11/nolte-truck-drivers-are-the-atlas-that-finally-shrugged/
Breitbart? Excellent? John Larkin seems to be a Cursitor Doom level
sucker
for right-wing propaganda of the more moronic kind.
"In fact, you could wipe society’s table clear of every writer, artist, >>>> actor, musician, professor, dancer, reporter, tastemaker, producer,
influencer, teacher, lobbyist, politician, everyone on TV, everyone who >>>> doesn’t get their hands dirty, and our world would keep turning just >>>> fine."
Not /all/ authors, of course.
Isaac Asimov wrote "The strain of anti-intellectualism has been
a constant thread winding its way through our political and
cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means
that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge"
You would starve to death without a lot of "anti-intellectuals" to
grow and ship your food. I suspect that Asimov would have too.
Of course.
And without intellectuals we didn't have any of the modern
conveniences, e.g. warm houses and electricity.
Democracy means that people agree that they are not superior to
everyone else;
No, it doesn't.
Besides, we don't live in a democracy.
that people have differing opinions and different
talents and common rights. Asimov states above that he is superior.
He was superior in some ways, and happy to proclaim it.
But not all ways, and happy to proclaim that too.
He, quite sensibly, railed about people exhibiting
the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
that people have differing opinions and different
talents and common rights. Asimov states above that he is superior.
He was superior in some ways, and happy to proclaim it.
But not all ways, and happy to proclaim that too.
He, quite sensibly, railed about people exhibiting
the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
"Anyone familiar with my scribbling knows that I separate modern society
into two categories: World Turners and The Useless.
Me? I’m no World Turner. I’m one of The Useless."
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
More "peaceful protesters":
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all
gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability
to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all
gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability
to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act. <https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all
gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability
to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act. <https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all
gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability
to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act. <https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public
road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
Sylvia.
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:
I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
I got the impression that Trudeau could unilaterally impose it without
a vote of Canada's Parliament. That doesn't seem right for a free country.
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all >>>> gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability >>>> to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
<https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was
protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
Sylvia.
I got the impression that Trudeau could unilaterally impose it without a vote of Canada's Parliament. That doesn't seem right for a free country.
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it
should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block
roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and
Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying
any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs
back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all
gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability
to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
     Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
<https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public
road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
Sylvia.
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote:More "peaceful protesters":
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all >>>> gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability >>>> to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
<https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was
protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
Sylvia.
I got the impression that Trudeau could unilaterally impose it without a vote of Canada's Parliament. That doesn't seem right for a free country.
On 15-Feb-22 2:00 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote: >>>>>> I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?More "peaceful protesters":
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all >>>> gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability >>>> to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
<https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was
protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly
the same there.
Sylvia.
I got the impression that Trudeau could unilaterally impose it withoutEmergencies by their very nature require immediate action. Mind you,
a vote of Canada's Parliament. That doesn't seem right for a free country.
given how long this has gone on for already, one might question whether
it can now qualify as an emergency.
Anyway, it has to be laid before Parliament within seven days, and
either house of Parliament can vote it down.
Later on, if 10 members of the Senate, or 20 members of the House of
Commons, sign a motion, there must be a debate on whether to revoke the emergency within 3 days.
So there are significant protections in place to prevent abuse. More
than we have for similar legislation in Australia, where the executive
is forever trying to get more power and less scrutiny.
Sylvia.
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/activists-take-over-a-seattle-neighborhood-banishing-the-police/2020/06/11/7172e1e6-ac24-11ea-a9d9-a81c1a491c52_story.html                                         Mikek
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/12/876293196/protesters-in-seattle-take-over-6-block-area-announce-an-autonomous-zone
On 2/10/2022 7:30 PM, Rick C wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Maybe just take over cities, burn buildings and exclude the police,
instead something non-violent like block a highway.
Seattle protesters take over city blocks to create police-free
'autonomous zone.
Links in case you forgot.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/activists-take-over-a-seattle-neighborhood-banishing-the-police/2020/06/11/7172e1e6-ac24-11ea-a9d9-a81c1a491c52_story.html
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/12/876293196/protesters-in-seattle-take-over-6-block-area-announce-an-autonomous-zone
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:54:09 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 15-Feb-22 2:00 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 8:49:16 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else wrote:given how long this has gone on for already, one might question whether
On 15-Feb-22 1:03 pm, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 3:57:28 PM UTC-6, bitrex wrote:I don't really see why that was necessary. If I park my car in a public >>>> road, blocking traffic, and refuse to move it, I would expect to be
On 2/13/2022 3:59 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 8:30:49 PM UTC-5, Rick C wrote: >>>>>>>> I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?More "peaceful protesters":
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
Seems like the truckers blocking the bridge between the US and Canada has been cleared. I guess those truckers won't be carrying any goods for a while. Who knows what it will take to get their rigs back once they are out of jail.
<https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/14/americas/canada-truckers-protest-monday/index.html>
Whatever legitimate driver's legitimate grievances may have been it all >>>>>> gets co-opted by militia nutters and generalized anti-government
whackjobs, the type who's mission in life is to protest their inability >>>>>> to put a gun up the ass of anyone who isn't themem...
Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act.
<https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2022/02/14/the-nuclear-option-trudeau-invokes-never-before-used-emergencies-act-to-crush-freedom-convoy-n1559158>
arrested, and see my car towed. It would not be a defence that I was
protesting about something.
Admittedly, I'm not in Canada, but I would think the law to be roughly >>>> the same there.
Sylvia.
I got the impression that Trudeau could unilaterally impose it without
a vote of Canada's Parliament. That doesn't seem right for a free country. >> Emergencies by their very nature require immediate action. Mind you,
it can now qualify as an emergency.
Anyway, it has to be laid before Parliament within seven days, and
either house of Parliament can vote it down.
Later on, if 10 members of the Senate, or 20 members of the House of
Commons, sign a motion, there must be a debate on whether to revoke the
emergency within 3 days.
So there are significant protections in place to prevent abuse. More
than we have for similar legislation in Australia, where the executive
is forever trying to get more power and less scrutiny.
Sylvia.
I learned something again. Thank you.
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and shut down cities. No?
I never was very good at understanding legal stuff.
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should
be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and
shut down cities. No?
<snipped the usual spam>
Hey Ricky, if that were TRUE you would PRODUCE IT, but you DON'T! So it
is just more of your BULLSHIT.
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should
be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and
shut down cities. No?
<snipped the usual spam>
Hey Ricky, if that were TRUE you would PRODUCE IT, but you DON'T! So it
is just more of your BULLSHIT.
But of course that law just enables the basic human right of self-defense, allowing drivers to escape when they are being attacked by mobs that are blocking the road.
Cannibal leftists want to outlaw self-defense, for obvious reasons, like to satisfy their creepy need to hurt people.
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:04:26 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there are places that have said it is ok to run over
protesters if they are blocking major highways. By corollary, it should >> be ok to blow up trucker's rigs if they are used to block roads and
shut down cities. No?
<snipped the usual spam>
Hey Ricky, if that were TRUE you would PRODUCE IT, but you DON'T! So it is just more of your BULLSHIT.
But of course that law just enables the basic human right of self-defense, allowing drivers to escape when they are being attacked by mobs that are blocking the road."Blocking the road" may be assault, in that it makes the drivers feel threatened, but it's not battery, against which the drivers would be entitled to mount a physical defense.
Cannibal leftists want to outlaw self-defense, for obvious reasons, like to satisfy their creepy need to hurt people."Cannibal leftists" don't actually exist - except in John Doe's fevered imagination - so, as usual, his claims about what they might want to do if they did exist tell us quite a bit about his psychotic fantasies, and nothing at all about the real world.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 7:09:04 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:world.
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:04:26 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
"Cannibal leftists" don't actually exist - except in John Doe's fevered imagination - so, as usual, his claims about what they might want to do if they did exist tell us quite a bit about his psychotic fantasies, and nothing at all about the real
The rhetorical "cannibal leftists" DO exist: they demand TOTAL COMPLAINCE, deviate in ANY WAY and you will be cancelled (or maybe just reprimanded as in the case of Caryn Elaine Johnson, aka Whoopi).
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 5:57:16 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:world.
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 7:09:04 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:04:26 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
"Cannibal leftists" don't actually exist - except in John Doe's fevered imagination - so, as usual, his claims about what they might want to do if they did exist tell us quite a bit about his psychotic fantasies, and nothing at all about the real
of spouting nonsense is to make you look stupid.The rhetorical "cannibal leftists" DO exist: they demand TOTAL COMPLAINCE, deviate in ANY WAY and you will be cancelled (or maybe just reprimanded as in the case of Caryn Elaine Johnson, aka Whoopi).Flyguy thinks that Whoopi Goldberg is a cannibal leftist?
This is serious dementia. He needs to get himself admitted to the nearest psychiatric hospital as a matter of urgency. Unless - of course - that's where he is posting from, which seems very likely.
Quite why he thinks that a rhetorical cannibal leftist would be any different from the regular - if utterly concocted - cannibal leftists that John Doe witters on about escapes me. The phrase is clearly being used for rhetorical effect, but the effect
Neither you nor John Doe seems to mind looking stupid, and you certainly don't shrink from giving that impression, but I doubt if you realise quite how stupid you actually look.
--
SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 6:51:49 AM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:world.
On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 5:57:16 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 7:09:04 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:04:26 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:
"Cannibal leftists" don't actually exist - except in John Doe's fevered imagination - so, as usual, his claims about what they might want to do if they did exist tell us quite a bit about his psychotic fantasies, and nothing at all about the real
effect of spouting nonsense is to make you look stupid.The rhetorical "cannibal leftists" DO exist: they demand TOTAL COMPLAINCE, deviate in ANY WAY and you will be cancelled (or maybe just reprimanded as in the case of Caryn Elaine Johnson, aka Whoopi).
Flyguy thinks that Whoopi Goldberg is a cannibal leftist?
This is serious dementia. He needs to get himself admitted to the nearest psychiatric hospital as a matter of urgency. Unless - of course - that's where he is posting from, which seems very likely.
Quite why he thinks that a rhetorical cannibal leftist would be any different from the regular - if utterly concocted - cannibal leftists that John Doe witters on about escapes me. The phrase is clearly being used for rhetorical effect, but the
Neither you nor John Doe seems to mind looking stupid, and you certainly don't shrink from giving that impression, but I doubt if you realise quite how stupid you actually look.
LOL!!!! Sloman can't read simple English!!!!! That, of course, IS NOT what I wrote.
I suggest that you REREAD it as many times as necessary (10-20 min), and report back.
The truckers have made their way to Washington. They seem to be circling the beltway at the moment. Well, not at THIS moment. I think they are all still asleep. I've read their intent is to clog traffic on the beltway to get the attention of thegovernments. I'm not sure how pissing off people trying to get to work is going to help their cause, unless they really believe there's no such thing as bad publicity.
On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 2:04:29 AM UTC-8, gnuarm.del...@gmail.com wrote:governments. I'm not sure how pissing off people trying to get to work is going to help their cause, unless they really believe there's no such thing as bad publicity.
The truckers have made their way to Washington. They seem to be circling the beltway at the moment. Well, not at THIS moment. I think they are all still asleep. I've read their intent is to clog traffic on the beltway to get the attention of the
The truckers, though, have a valid point: travel restrictions made sense when there were few hotspots
and lots of no-covid-here acres. Now, however, there's (in the US) covid broadly spread everywhere.
So, internal travel restrictions this month are a nuisance, but not really greatly effective. For a trucker,
it's galling to see the cosmetic political message "we're taking COVID seriously" being
implemented as a travel ban. A travel ban is officious and strict, and... currently a
theatric response and only slightly an effective countermeasure.
A theatric challenge to a theatric policy is ... oddly appropriate.
Mexico-border restriction from the Trump years is rather ignoring the fact that Mexico doesn't
have more COVID than the US; why are we still treating that dotted line on the map as though
it were a COVID-prevention wall? What's the vaccination situation like in Mexico, maybe they
should close the US border for protection?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 185 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 87:06:48 |
| Calls: | 3,750 |
| Files: | 11,172 |
| Messages: | 3,462,270 |
