• Re: Corona Update 23: 103.7% dead babies, PFizer document leaks onto th

    From TTman@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 3 16:12:00 2022
    On 03/02/2022 15:51, skybuck2000 wrote:
    3 february 2022:

    I have very important information for you if you are a woman and are pregnant or want to become pregnant and want to give birth to a healthy baby.

    A confidental PFizer document just leaked onto the internet where PFizer itself reports that of all reported pregancy outcomes 100% of the babies DIED !

    All reported pregnancy outcomes of women injected with PFizer corona vaccine

    It becomes even more crazy it's 103.7% because there was a TWIN too, and they all died !

    28 babies died out of a reported 27 pregancies.

    The document is here and it is full of mambo jumbo to try and mislead as much as possible, good luck analyzing it:

    https://drtrozzi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Pfizer-Cumulative-Analysis-of-Post-authorization-Adverse-Event-Reports.pdf

    Bye for now,
    Skybuck Flying ! =D

    Do you really believe that rubbish? My neice gave birth yesterday to a
    healthy baby and guess what covid jabs she's had? Correct Pfizer...

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From skybuck2000@21:1/5 to TTman on Thu Feb 3 15:17:09 2022
    On Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 5:12:12 PM UTC+1, TTman wrote:
    On 03/02/2022 15:51, skybuck2000 wrote:
    3 february 2022:

    I have very important information for you if you are a woman and are pregnant or want to become pregnant and want to give birth to a healthy baby.

    A confidental PFizer document just leaked onto the internet where PFizer itself reports that of all reported pregancy outcomes 100% of the babies DIED !

    All reported pregnancy outcomes of women injected with PFizer corona vaccine

    It becomes even more crazy it's 103.7% because there was a TWIN too, and they all died !

    28 babies died out of a reported 27 pregancies.

    The document is here and it is full of mambo jumbo to try and mislead as much as possible, good luck analyzing it:

    https://drtrozzi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Pfizer-Cumulative-Analysis-of-Post-authorization-Adverse-Event-Reports.pdf

    Bye for now,
    Skybuck Flying ! =D
    Do you really believe that rubbish? My neice gave birth yesterday to a healthy baby and guess what covid jabs she's had? Correct Pfizer...

    Plenty of time for that baby to die !

    Pray, Pray, Pray.

    Bye,
    Skybuck =D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Platt@21:1/5 to skybuck2000@hotmail.com on Thu Feb 3 16:25:51 2022
    In article <c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16-b449-b9fdf312be40n@googlegroups.com>, skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

    A confidental PFizer document just leaked onto the internet where PFizer itself reports that of all reported
    pregancy outcomes 100% of the babies DIED !

    All reported pregnancy outcomes of women injected with PFizer corona vaccine

    It becomes even more crazy it's 103.7% because there was a TWIN too, and they all died !

    28 babies died out of a reported 27 pregancies.

    The document is here and it is full of mambo jumbo to try and mislead as much as possible, good luck analyzing it:

    OK, dude - I challenge you. Exactly _where_ in that document does it
    say that, or give those specific numbers? Page number and section,
    please.

    I read through the portions which mention pregnancy, twins, and other
    such phrases. As I read it, the report says no such thing. Either you
    didn't actually read it, or you're badly misinterpreting what it says and
    what it means.

    Important thing to remember: summaries like this are based on "adverse
    event" reports. That is, they look at ONLY THE CASES IN WHICH PEOPLE
    REPORTED PROBLEMS. Any percentages you see here are based on that,
    NOT on the total number of people who received the vaccine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to skybuck2000@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 4 06:53:29 2022
    skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote in news:c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16- b449-b9fdf312be40n@googlegroups.com:

    Plenty of time for that baby to die !

    Pray, Pray, Pray.

    Bye,
    Skybuck =D

    You are the fucking baby.

    plenty of time for you to die, but stop using your fat fingers for
    fucking up your computers and use them to insert a hunk of lead into
    your head at a 1000 meters per second.

    Make a video and we will use it to demonstrate how inertia works. Be
    sure to paint the wall behind you a nice stark white first. Point it
    up from your sternum through your lower jaw and straight up through the
    top. Then lean way back in the chair, pointing the top of your head at
    the wall, and make that fat finger work correctly for once.

    Plenty of time for you to figure that one out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Brown@21:1/5 to Dave Platt on Fri Feb 4 09:31:35 2022
    On 04/02/2022 01:25, Dave Platt wrote:
    In article <c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16-b449-b9fdf312be40n@googlegroups.com>, skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

    <snip drivel>


    OK, dude - I challenge you. Exactly _where_ in that document does it
    say that, or give those specific numbers? Page number and section,
    please.

    I read through the portions which mention pregnancy, twins, and other
    such phrases. As I read it, the report says no such thing. Either you didn't actually read it, or you're badly misinterpreting what it says and what it means.

    Important thing to remember: summaries like this are based on "adverse
    event" reports. That is, they look at ONLY THE CASES IN WHICH PEOPLE REPORTED PROBLEMS. Any percentages you see here are based on that,
    NOT on the total number of people who received the vaccine.



    You also have to look at who wrote it and where it was published. The
    doctor involved is currently being taken to court in Canada for selling "medical exceptions" for face masks, vaccines, and anything else that
    the Covid conspiracy loonies want and are willing to pay for. He is an opportunist criminal, and writes to con people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From skybuck2000@21:1/5 to DecadentLinux...@decadence.org on Mon Feb 7 20:39:51 2022
    On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 7:53:40 AM UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
    skybuck2000 <skybu...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16- b449-b9fd...@googlegroups.com:
    Plenty of time for that baby to die !

    Pray, Pray, Pray.

    Bye,
    Skybuck =D
    You are the fucking baby.

    plenty of time for you to die, but stop using your fat fingers for
    fucking up your computers and use them to insert a hunk of lead into
    your head at a 1000 meters per second.

    Make a video and we will use it to demonstrate how inertia works. Be
    sure to paint the wall behind you a nice stark white first. Point it
    up from your sternum through your lower jaw and straight up through the
    top. Then lean way back in the chair, pointing the top of your head at
    the wall, and make that fat finger work correctly for once.

    Plenty of time for you to figure that one out.

    YOU MUST BE REALLY UGLY TO HAVE SO MUCH HATE.

    BUT DON'T WORRY UGLY PEOPLE CAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE FEEL HORNY TOO..

    THERE IS STILL HOPE FOR YOU.

    DON'T GIVE UP.

    STOP THE HATE THOUGH, IT'S BAD FOR YOU HAHA.

    AND A MAJOR WASTE OF TIME AND BRAIN CELLS.

    BYE,
    BYE,
    SKYBUCK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From skybuck2000@21:1/5 to Dave Platt on Mon Feb 7 20:23:34 2022
    On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 1:26:08 AM UTC+1, Dave Platt wrote:
    In article <c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16...@googlegroups.com>,
    skybuck2000 <skybu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

    A confidental PFizer document just leaked onto the internet where PFizer itself reports that of all reported
    pregancy outcomes 100% of the babies DIED !

    All reported pregnancy outcomes of women injected with PFizer corona vaccine

    It becomes even more crazy it's 103.7% because there was a TWIN too, and they all died !

    28 babies died out of a reported 27 pregancies.

    The document is here and it is full of mambo jumbo to try and mislead as much as possible, good luck analyzing it:
    OK, dude - I challenge you. Exactly _where_ in that document does it
    say that, or give those specific numbers? Page number and section,
    please.

    LOL, YOU AGAIN, TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND IT LOL, SO YOU ADMIT IT IS CONFUSING ! HAHAHAHAHAHA

    VERY WELL, LET'S ANALYZE IT:

    PAGE 12:

    "Table 6. Description of Missing Information"

    TOPIC:

    "Use in
    Pregnancy
    and lactation"

    THEN IT SAYS:

    "270 pregnancies"

    THEN IT SAYS:

    "outcome pending (5),"

    THEN IT SAYS:

    "). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies"

    SO THAT IS 270 - (238 + 5=243) = 27 PREGANCIES WITH KNOWN/REPORTED OUTCOMES.

    IT ALSO SAYS:

    spontaneous abortion (23),

    IT ALSO SAYS:

    premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with
    intrauterine death (2 each)

    2X2 = 4

    IT ALSO SAYS:

    spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1
    each)

    23+4+1=28 DEAD BABIES

    SO WHAT WE DO KNOWN IS THAT FROM THE 27 KNOWN PREGANCY OUTCOMES 28 MOTHERFUCKERS DIED.

    DO YOU GET IT NOW ?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    I DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWW =D


    I read through the portions which mention pregnancy, twins, and other
    such phrases. As I read it, the report says no such thing. Either you
    didn't actually read it, or you're badly misinterpreting what it says and what it means.

    WELCOME TO THE WORLD OF PFIZER MISLEADINGS.

    I JUST CLEARED THAT UP FOR YOU.

    BUT THE REAL CREDIT GOES TO THE DOCTOR

    WHICH IS NOW BEING CENSORED AND MADE OUT TO BE A DEVIL.

    HE IS THE ONE WHO CAN ANALYZE THIS DOCUMENT AND MAKE YOU UNDERSTAND IT.

    CAUSE HE KNOWS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT AND NOW YOU SHOULD TOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo.

    Important thing to remember: summaries like this are based on "adverse
    event" reports. That is, they look at ONLY THE CASES IN WHICH PEOPLE
    REPORTED PROBLEMS. Any percentages you see here are based on that,
    NOT on the total number of people who received the vaccine.

    NOT ONE OF THE VACCINATED MOTHERS HAD A LIVING CHILD, THAT IS WHAT THIS REPORTS.

    BINGO.

    BYE,
    SKYBUCK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From skybuck2000@21:1/5 to David Brown on Mon Feb 7 20:27:54 2022
    On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 9:31:47 AM UTC+1, David Brown wrote:
    On 04/02/2022 01:25, Dave Platt wrote:
    In article <c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16...@googlegroups.com>,
    skybuck2000 <skybu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    <snip drivel>

    OK, dude - I challenge you. Exactly _where_ in that document does it
    say that, or give those specific numbers? Page number and section,
    please.

    I read through the portions which mention pregnancy, twins, and other
    such phrases. As I read it, the report says no such thing. Either you didn't actually read it, or you're badly misinterpreting what it says and what it means.

    Important thing to remember: summaries like this are based on "adverse event" reports. That is, they look at ONLY THE CASES IN WHICH PEOPLE REPORTED PROBLEMS. Any percentages you see here are based on that,
    NOT on the total number of people who received the vaccine.


    You also have to look at who wrote it and where it was published. The
    doctor involved is currently being taken to court in Canada for selling "medical exceptions" for face masks, vaccines, and anything else that
    the Covid conspiracy loonies want and are willing to pay for. He is an opportunist criminal, and writes to con people.

    HAHA !

    THIS WAS A DOCUMENT ACQUIRED THROUGH A LAWSUIT !

    THIS DOCUMENT COMES FROM PFIZER CAUSE OF THE LAWSUIT !

    THIS IS TRIAL DATA.

    NOT THE REPORTING SYSTEM.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA YOU BEING FOOLED AGAIN BY THEM, THE PFIZER ALSO KNOWN AS LUCIFER.

    THEY JUST THROW THAT SYSTEM IN TO THROW MY SAND IN YOUR DUMBASS FACE.

    THEY JUST SHOVE THAT DATA INTO THAT SYSTEM AND SAY SEEEEEEEE
    MILLIONS OF PEOPLE BLABLABLABLABLA.

    BUT THIS WAS FROM THEIR TRAIL...

    KIT DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY INJECTED THAT INTO A DATABASE ELSEWHERE..

    THIS DOCUMENT IS FROM 21 FEB 2001

    SO ANY REPORTS AFTER THAT IN THE DATABASE ARE NOT RELEVANT HEHEHEHE.

    SO YOU CAN AT LEAST CUT THAT OUT OF YOUR DUMBASS STATISTICS.

    :P*

    I COULD GIVE YOU EVEN MORE INFORMATION, BUT YOU WILL HAVE TO FIND IT YOURSELF :p*

    HEHE... OTHERWISE YOUR WEB SURFING SKILLS AND INFORMATION ACQUISTION SKILLS ARE SHIT

    AND THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO RELY ON MY UNFORTUNATELY TO INFORM YOU HAHA.

    BUT IT'S BETTER IF YOU FIND OUR OWN SOURCES OF INFORMATION.

    BYE,
    SKYBUCK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 7 20:57:45 2022
    On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 3:28:02 PM UTC+11, skybuck2000 wrote:
    On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 9:31:47 AM UTC+1, David Brown wrote:
    On 04/02/2022 01:25, Dave Platt wrote: In article <c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16...@googlegroups.com>,
    skybuck2000 <skybu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    <snip drivel>

    OK, dude - I challenge you. Exactly _where_ in that document does it
    say that, or give those specific numbers? Page number and section, please.

    I read through the portions which mention pregnancy, twins, and other such phrases. As I read it, the report says no such thing. Either you didn't actually read it, or you're badly misinterpreting what it says and
    what it means.

    Important thing to remember: summaries like this are based on "adverse event" reports. That is, they look at ONLY THE CASES IN WHICH PEOPLE REPORTED PROBLEMS. Any percentages you see here are based on that,
    NOT on the total number of people who received the vaccine.


    You also have to look at who wrote it and where it was published. The doctor involved is currently being taken to court in Canada for selling "medical exceptions" for face masks, vaccines, and anything else that
    the Covid conspiracy loonies want and are willing to pay for. He is an opportunist criminal, and writes to con people.

    <snipped Skybuck being as deluded as ever>

    BUT IT'S BETTER IF YOU FIND OUR OWN SOURCES OF INFORMATION.

    Skybuck imagines that he might be a source of information. He's actually a source of confusion, made slightly more irritating by his delusion that he knows what he is talking about.

    This user group does have a few idiots like him - they get castigated as idiots on a regular basis, but they are idiotic enough to imagine that it is the incoherent ideas that they think they are presenting that generate the criticism, rather than their
    fatuity in thinking that their deluded misapprehensions are worth posting.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to skybuck2000@hotmail.com on Tue Feb 8 13:48:02 2022
    skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote in news:3a7ca19b-ee05-4c21-b207-11ed345174a2n@googlegroups.com:

    On Friday, February 4, 2022 at 7:53:40 AM UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
    skybuck2000 <skybu...@hotmail.com> wrote in
    news:c1cc9d0f-c7d9-4f16- b449-b9fd...@googlegroups.com:
    Plenty of time for that baby to die !

    Pray, Pray, Pray.

    Bye,
    Skybuck =D
    You are the fucking baby.

    plenty of time for you to die, but stop using your fat fingers
    for fucking up your computers and use them to insert a hunk of
    lead into your head at a 1000 meters per second.

    Make a video and we will use it to demonstrate how inertia works.
    Be sure to paint the wall behind you a nice stark white first.
    Point it up from your sternum through your lower jaw and straight
    up through the top. Then lean way back in the chair, pointing the
    top of your head at the wall, and make that fat finger work
    correctly for once.

    Plenty of time for you to figure that one out.

    YOU MUST BE REALLY UGLY TO HAVE SO MUCH HATE.

    All caps group invading retard! CCAD!

    BUT DON'T WORRY UGLY PEOPLE CAN MAKE OTHER PEOPLE FEEL HORNY TOO..

    Make you feel a 454 Cassul dlug in the face.

    THERE IS STILL HOPE FOR YOU.

    Post your address so I can hope to coe over there and show you just
    how much hope I have.

    DON'T GIVE UP.

    Please FOAD. No... CCAD!

    STOP THE HATE THOUGH, IT'S BAD FOR YOU HAHA.

    Fuck off, SkyTard.

    AND A MAJOR WASTE OF TIME AND BRAIN CELLS.

    I am doing fine. Post that address now, pussy boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to skybuck2000@hotmail.com on Tue Feb 8 13:43:35 2022
    skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1133026b-0f50-48be- 8641-be06686e1a3fn@googlegroups.com:

    THEY JUST THROW THAT SYSTEM IN TO THROW MY SAND IN YOUR DUMBASS FACE.


    Go the FUCK AWAY, CHILD.

    CCAD!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to skybuck2000@hotmail.com on Tue Feb 8 13:42:37 2022
    skybuck2000 <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote in news:4dd2f578-6b4d-4110- a7d8-95b968b3fc7dn@googlegroups.com:

    I JUST CLEARED THAT UP FOR YOU.


    ALL CAPS motherfucker.

    Hey SkyTard... it isn't FOAD for you...


    No... you deserve to CCAD.

    Catch
    Covid
    And
    Die

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)