If the Gödel Escher Bach light cube was actually a different shape, and every face was a vector graphic, the two reflections that cause the images to be right side up and right side right would reach the parabola coated with casimir flashlight from the
math topology the leading equation part would always have the time traversing the parabola be utilized to magnify the details whether you went near or far or viewed at an angle the vector graphics resolution would always be higher than the cube

Could that also be utilized at each node at the network to make the kinds of variability that could occur have a so travel,

I think I should think about how to make the network of all the things a girls kindergartner does like goes near her friends and talks with them, how she does certain things at certain times because of the teacher and how to optimize thatp

Should the casimir flashlight coating build nodes faster than the nodes can run

A thing about theMWI is that because there are, i read,more branch universes than the source universes and they all make casimir flashlights with some multiple of casimir flashlight output that is used at the multioptimal network does that make
communicating MWI universes (like overlapping MWI) does that give the capacity of the casimir flashlight at the source universe the ability to make more light, if so then the casimir flashlight can make more network nodes, arraying them at nonsaturated
topology, than the network, at any velocity can saturate, the benefit is that thinking of kindergartners at kindergarten they are so saturated they ignore things. Some of the time rather than seeking the higher and higher vector graphic detail that PLLs
their output, PLL bringing the ability to be on specification sufficiently to have a mathematically optimal output (perhaps one nonsentient node is making new vector graphics being informed and valenced from the other nodes) so that kind of originates
optimality

To produce optimumness if a sentience does something benevolent or filler-like at the network the nonsentient nodes have numerous mathematical constructions, the sandwich theory of calculus with internode connections that create math noting the
multiples of output of the casimir flashlight, and making nodes at a connection topology at higher velocity than they can be saturated if the sentience has any output to the network, mathematically because of the connection topology of the nodes the
sentiences behaviors will always be less than saturation as well as greater than nonactivity because of the sandwich theory of calculus

Is it possible for a network to be optimal if the sentience is only partially attentive; the nodes store utilize and transmit data, transform things, replicate and recycle, depending on the sentiece, and the variety of nonattentiveness it is possible to
use true neutral voluntary stimulus to cause a behavioral tropism at less than the threshold of awareness of the sentience, if the network notices the sentience has noticed anything then the stimulus thought to be neutral ceases occurring and a different
truly neutral nonperveptible stimulus is utilized, the MWI could have accessible either what the sentience is likely to like, noting it can be encouraged as a tropism absent ever reaching the consciousness of the sentience, or, there could actually be a
transfinitude of true neutral nonperceptible stimulus as available MWI data, if the sentience remains inattentive then the math of (is, is a different thing, did not think to participate, had not actually heard or thought of participating), the network
is nonsentient, so the math concept of not in use or I have not read next years textbook yet have a math space. I will find out if I can do better than that as I am thinking optimum networks go with continuous math functions, thinking about optimal
networks of kindergarteners

Another opportunity is making the math space the network is built at and built of is to find the math system that makes iterated function compression take as few or fewer steps to compress as it does to iterate, or at topology or geometry, simply look up
a graphic or utilize an equation with a noniterated solution if you like you can record everything on the internet, find a tree with trillions or quadrillions of leaves and pack it into a human rememberable number sequence, that when a function, cellular
automata or something is repeatedly applied to it the data string grows and after a number of iterations the original data, the entire internet is produced, what I perceive college professors and Microsoft found out about this is that it takes a bunch of
computing cycles to compress the data tree to seed and equation or cellular automata action table. I think that it could be possible for a person to ask a mathematician "i heard there are noncommutative algebras and that factoring in them is less easy,
might take more steps, or sometimes comes up with a big plurality of solutions, looking at it the other way is there such a thing as a hypercommutative algebra or topology where factoring is many times easier and uses fewer operations" note the
hypercommutative algebra does not need to be supportive of the rest of known math" then the mathematician says well actually at a completely equational treatment of the 4th dimension it is absent possibility for a knot to stay knotted, the extra movement
coordinates make it just slide apart, a topology that causes hyper commutation might actually have less than three dimensions because you are changing the number of state spaces available so there are a different fewer number, one thing that might
function is a new fractal dimension between 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 like 2.7





The simplest kind of a casimir flashlight is just an array

Fun thing: a protein that makes a bunch of spaced fins so the space between the fins is the right size to generate casimir effect photons, electrons and even atoms, as a dry heap, at half the volume being gaps a kg of the protein would generate I think,
a measurable amount of photons and electrons. There are many ways to produce this, visible photons could be produced

A casimir effect frequency doubling crystal with lanes of space at it internally could make photons then double their frequency

A puffy banana shape with a chamber, or line of chambers in the middle would light up the chambers interior to the puffy banana chambers and a sqiggle banana with a TIR surface and a refractive index could cause the photons to travel the gentle curves,
even leading multiple curves to a most lit up chamber § ¿? …

A different thing was is the casimir output of a cool stellar mass, or a just less than fusion mass spaced out so it makes the most casimir photons and electrons possible

if 27 blobs on sticks all point towards a center do you get more casimir effect, does a pile of jacks with more tips generate more casimir effect, what about an atomized spray of quantum dots or a spray of dendric polymers with an omsimi Os at the center
and 7, 8, or 9 lines coming from it

The parabola with the upper reaches at a wavelength larger than the diameter of the math topology it happens to be at heightens as the topological universe expands

The mathematical shape that would make the superposition of a minimax curve be planar is at the center of translation of each node at the network

even though minimax is like two u shaped things stacked, this might be like a Mini bowl fore each node, there could be a different, or function combined minibowl for each node, like a physical bowl for location

Could an electron minibowl at semiconductor technology, like at a laser diode, cause electron concentration that minimizes stachasticism and makes higher frequencies or less jitter possible, could electron mini bowls function as higher resolution
capacitors with narrower specifiable output,

At a physical matter system could the two u shapes stacked or the sides of the

It you think of stacked U shapes, one inverted, as a minimax curve or bowl shape, with the gap between them less than the leakehage size of the atoms as petals then energy specific particles shape of each egg cups would have two different atoms anemeter
scoop radial array is better if it is a globe-like 3D array of bowls (or minimax curves) with different atoms piling up, concentric plates of these (like candypanned sequential globe of anemoment coatings could pile different kinds of atoms or at
nanotechnology, partially assembled shapes, if the nanotechnology repeatable building units were like T and [] and (), they could each pile up at optimal concentrations near each other

Breathsavers at base of bowl or minimax curve

Minimax curve inside a bowl, minimax curve with

Air popper popcorn maker with the warming motive air coming from the electrode like, breathsavers like, atom motionized and charge maker at the base of the mowl or the middle of the minimax curve

At a mathematical topology using the equations of 4D or 2D completely spatial topology are there more things a bowl curve or a minimax curve can do, or is there a completely new thing where the 4D causes a new spatial direction of favored velocitization
or concentration, it seems like 3D would have

Bowl shaped and minax curve expansions at different spatial dimensions

1D,

2D, the available travel directioms vary distance travelled and velocity on the Y axis, and distributes items spatially on the x axis

At 3D, usual bowls an minimax curves with z-axis effect at bowls and minimax curves from y axis increase

At spatial 4D it could be that a completely new spatial dimension, which i might have read is sometimes called kana is produced, that gives the ability to make bowls that concentrate kana while ignoring z (high sides in kana, null length sides vertically
(Z), or adjustable z sides in kana with zero x length, is still a bowl, that reminds me of a kind of tall teleporttion scan line (kana y and z bowl sides only) that if you physically moved it would traverse a person and teleport them to the different
kana location, at an x,z, kana Bowl, spatially flat panel that if you put an item with enough energy at it gets out of the y and z and kana only bowl then traverses kana, if you made one then high energy items would teleport kana distances at 3D while
remaining at original height and depth (the trajecories original travel path, specifying the curve equations at all 4 dimensions would make a bowl (a bowlful of teleport distance), or an acceleration region that moved things away from the center at a 4D
minimax curve

1.2,3,4 with spatial D seem, to my perception to have a thing² amount of greater areas of effect like 2d looks like a U or a ^, and

Without gravity what do bowl curves and minimax curves do, well it is math so you just input the energy numbers at the equation as you like, it seems like bowls and minimax at popular culture just want to move to distal locations or gather at the middle
of the bowl from unmentioned gravity, where every input to be calculated is actually a minimatrix or 2 element array, at floating point numbers the attraction or repulsion of any force at the 3Dimensions of the curve, like a bowl, cause movement effect,
and the kind of static object new location use of the bowl curve equations are accomplished, and then you know the new location of the object, there are other applications as well, the varying acceleration of the object (Calculus) could be as interesting
as where it goes, can you minimax a new idea or trend (hyper popularizing or hyper rejecting, noting that the same idea can be stated as its direct form or, sometimes as s rejectable that build something beneficial if the rejectable is beneficial
todistance oneself from) and do different actions, media, or even locations have different minimax curves, or at a bowl, maintenance and continuity of a preferred thing are automatically reinforced (tropism to bowl curves initial x z y coordinates)
unless the energy is so high, and at an application this can be benevolent beneficial energy, that the item gets out of the bowl, notably bowls actually select for propagating large qualitative, high amplitude changes while minimax curves actually select
for least extraneous variables like friction or anisotropy of a field, so minimax separations, accelerations, and higher distance between origin and object is mathematically related, and equation-friendly, to easy changes of any weight

(What if you use a matrix of greater than 2 items at a bowl or minimax curve, perhaps sometes partially considered as a bowl or minimax curve with gravity) [G, weight], like a 2 times two matrix or a three times three matrix, then at another system of
equations, or possible a curve made up of something differently curved than a rotated parabolic spline (bowl) or a stacked two units of parabolic splines of different ±ness,

Thinking about the way minimax curves utilize ±ness as part of their curves mathematical topological identity, could there be a three or four directionality of topological space variation greater than ±ness, possibly the (1i)+7 two component number
could have a source identiness at curves (although, things being what they are weight or energy at stationaryness at origin is qualitatively different than curve traversal) so like the actual curved D object would look completely different if the curve
math were based around the (±i with ±weight) variable form, I am reminded of the soil triangle with curved sides,

I like continuous functions but there is the possibility that presence or absence of functions causes a discontinuous function at A three or four curvature form, discontinuous functions, to my perception automatically instantiate being able to make a
boolean logic math space

New to me is that a transistor on/off boolean logic is two state while the three or greater attributes of a new capability and attribute enhanced alternative expansion to bowl curve and minimax math curve has attributes as well as possible benefits,
simultaneous general math awesomemess and actual applications, thinking of optimizing a network, the greater ability to heighten coherent-like behavior and be on-specification from less possibly spurious data or out of context operations has a
noncoherence and spurious data preclusion that comes from having a replacement for a bit, or an extra bit, at every item, and, at those networks with data (like although kindergartners and their voluntary networks can be measured, kindergartners are
different than, and qualitatively different and greater than just data), with the data at data transfering networks, curve topolgies that surpass minimax curves and bowls are three or four state and that ±i as well as ±weight at a number as attributes
would have 2^2 (2²) as the base number of bits as its computational unit, and that zero has on one bit, the empty set has zero bits, a number like 2 has 4 bits, and a number like i0+2 has 3 bits and 2i+1 has has 5 bits, notably this is different than
the number of bits at an integer at a bowl math curve or minimax math curve

So an application is this, if you have two systems with three state weight variables the ±amount complex number compont (3i), or Even just presence or absence of a complex number component and a ±integer weight as an application you can make a
containing, with accelerative spread (minimax curve) or additional new attribute curve that contributes weighted items to the next, possibly triangular curve in the stack (rather than just grab the three attributes make a triangle it is possible a
location tropism at a bowl you can accumulate numerous separate items of different weight

Two different math curves (niftier than bowl or minimax curve), bowl, or minimax, psssing traversing numerically weighted objects to each other, at some positional relations but not others (edge to edge dimers or meet in the middle of the bowl (makes
everything from a )( to a two sides of a bowl omitting bases make a tube that gets traversed, absent gravity the new gathering area might be the middle of the tube which has the new attribute of being right at the vertical-like center of the two curves,
aimimax vurve stacked on another would create a different mathematical space, with height effect on the weight having anitropy with the tall side connecting the upcurves of one with the upcurves of the other, without energy change at the weigh, but at
gravity versions. The possibility of being with a rotation variation of linked rampswith the anitone curve inverted does a different thing)( dimers are anitropic, and stacks are height polarized but functional), >

At two stacked curves you make a new kind of binoast, or if you prefer a weight classifier, possibly much more efficient than some other weight sorters

Sutomated generation of things better than Turing machines, noting 0,0,1 automata, tree automata,

Deep learning ai looks at first million or billion generations of all the n-rule automata,like 0,0,1 where their combinatorial generative space can be computed in less than a month, possibly the first trillion distinct rule seys, at 700different,
identical between ruleset different initial values, at some automata there are nstates per cell (stay, make neighbor, leave)

There might be 2^4 (2⁴) attributes to a curve traversing weight with a complex number form, that means those curves could have 16 different things that happen with the travelling mass, hop up, hole pass, chirality, beyond 2 state chirality like 3
symmetry or aperiodic tiling,

What are new attributes of bowl or minimax curves with a complex number component

1D seems to generate math, like things have discontinuous ness without putting boolean logical or set theory at the math space, to make a bowl you day, no travel is visible, unless it isgreater than or equals 700, and if it is above a certain amount then
it is like origin + 700 instantly, while at minimax curve it is like saying any amount >0 causes any amount from .1 to 700 units of travel automatically, these have a kind of instantiation logic where if there is a thing, it appears on a number line
differently, and, or, not each come from different combined 1D curves or equations for 1D with a minimax inside a bowl or a minimax with a dip in the middle of it, making computers and logic new and replacing set theory seems nice and has utiltity

A modification to 3D bowls and minimax curves is with with modification (upcurved ski jump, or pour spout) the z direction can be modified from monoeffect z± changes or things move up sides of bowls you get ski jump or pour spout as well, it is possible
a perimeter lip (ski jumps or pour spouts) could always make output that considered as a group have soliton shapely

Noting 3D bowl or minimax distal tips adjusting z velocity, adding y and x component perhsps a soliton shaped bowl of minimax curve can be produced. Rather than just a U curve, among them one ~~~ frequency valley and two peaks, you could have the two
peaks and a velley a U is made from have a soliton ~~~ shape

or a U stacked, the U shape would be direction

Noting soliton shaped emissions from modified lip bowls and minimax curves, when considered as a group are output as a soliton, could an atom beam, directed at a double slit do a new thing with the lines of interference produced, perhaps it would just
make tighter narrow lines but I do not know. Soliton shaped beams could have an effect on the traversal distance or highness of resolution at the delayed quantum choice eraser lengthening the duration of the amount of retrocausal time that can be
produced or also making effects more precise

At 4D time you get motion concentration or spread out from bowls or minimax curves that causes time pooling (the 4th dimension) or timelines that velocitize away from each other, a possible green shift MWI technology that bowls concentrating cosimilars
at the different universes or separates them as much as possible

Schoedingers equation version of MWI is duotree branches, other new versions of or replacements of scroedingers equations might have more simultaneous near universeses, making multiramps at the 4D bowl or minimax curve do parallel sorting, or even
realationing

Thinking network optimization casimir flashlight that traverses energy or even data between MWI (from nested overlap MWI connecting casimir flashlights) could use 4D bowl curve technology to drawn content from most similar MWI universe causing less data
variability and greater network predictability, supporting optimal network continuity of function

Can minimax and bowl shaped atom-composed sorting curves at nanotechnology function well enough at Santa Barbara california USA June 1st daytime temperatures to make concentrations of nanotechnology repeat units to make nanotechnology objects even though
it is warmer than liquid nitrogen on earth's surface , then that would be a Santa barbara temperature nanotechnology that can build things

Similarly could a physical minimax curve or bowl, likely with energy ramps be a catalyst, the bowl or minimax curve could have an osmium, cobalt, or rhenium atom at one angle of the bowl's energy tuned ramo to do catalysis of molecules right at that spot
where there was a concentration of ramped atoms

Nanotechnology atom sorter, only atoms of a certain size can take a particular minimax shaped petal energetic acceleration (minimax effect) actual physical shape pathways, also could a stack of mimimax curves, possibly with spaces between them,
effectively filter atoms to each of a different angle at 360° as the atoms had the spontsneous energy (like charge), input energy, like voltage, or even stochastic autowiggle to travel the minimax curve or take the right pitch of ramp to get out of the
bowl

The tir plasmid is

Is it possible to use a vector graphic of a lookup table, such that if a light wave is in phase it is modally processed but at phase deviation it gets trimmed a Planck length per cycle from a nondynamic material

Longevity technology

They can make many organisms live Longer like double lifespan c elegans, 400% greater lifespan yeast as well as some published

100% and 60% mice; I think they should feed the 400% yeast to c elegans to find out what happens, they could also feed the blenderized c elegans to the yeast





Rather than

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)