written previously: possibly making word lists of words new from last week could be beneficial, also pick out three new words to learn like "Monday" or "these" and bring them up again next session. Bring paper to the classroom.

Suggest the children have what is likely fun reading words that spontaneously occur from a car view. If they don't know the word they can recognize the letters and say first or all letters at "yield" or "mall".

Look up math analysis online

Customize honest praise more than saying good or right; John might then hear, " I like the way you repeat the word right after I read it"

While they are reading most of the text, suggest Gage say the word after I supplementally read it, also Zara

It might work and thus double practice, "have your parent read this to you again tonight!" "You'll be extra good reading this to your parent because we already practiced!" Gage might do well with this, he likes his family a lot.

Find lively books for Clayton Dr Seuss rhyming poems might be lively enough to maintain attention while making books and reading actively fun. Practice saying the letters of words so he knows all the letter shapes. dbp etc.

Mention most beneficial child parent ideas to Shay Stacer like teaching/positioning/medicating (taurine)/staging child produced content that makes the parent feel good and emotionally connected to their children, even though it is prompted, thus they
become even nicer to their children

How big would the detector have to be to measure the entire universal wave function? Is it littler than a universe? Could it be one durable particle responding to gravity? Which brings up how high a resolution is necessary to make an observation "gravity,
from all directions, yep. That one particle tells it like it is" Might be less than sufficient. So what is a shannon information theory minimum to make an UWF observation; if it were a p value it would be eight things.

The detector that can measure the entire universal wave function, regardless of size might be easier to construct or more math and logic parsimonious than unitary MWI; to some people, but not others, that looks better. Could building a detector capable
of observing the entire universal wave function obviate future multiverses? No need for branching when you've got it observed. The thing is JY was able to describe alternate versions of Earth's history (he said there are some without the internet), so JY
data might align with the multiverse.

Just for amusement, what about the parts of the universe that are beyond the light cone of the alleged big bang; are they a boundary between entirely different MWI universe sized wave functions? Hint: quantum entangled photons communicate at least 10,000
times faster than light travels so that portion of overlapping space with .000001% naturally occurring quantum entangled photons would have a huge volume overlap or expansion of the MWI area.

If there is a buildable detector for the entire universal wave function? could the MWI come up with varied universes where it was either working or turned off? That might cause a growth MWI branch and a branchless determined universe. Which is better to
live in? Have nonhuman observers already observed and made the universe that humans live at as wave function specific branch determined?

Could people tell if the entire universal wave function has been previously observed; some approach to verifying or refuting that preobservation could verify or refute or verify the MWI What would act different in a preobserved universe; its remotely
possible that the crust of Newtonian deterministic physics comes from some universal resolution of some possibly big quantum thing. So building a universal wave function (UWF). detector, then detecting the UWF, could be measured as to whether it extended
newtonianism to some previously unnewtownian area; building the detector would change physics.

Just for fun, noting there are different sizes of infinities (aleph numbers) could a quantum event detector/MWI branchmaker be constructed that operated at a different higher aleph number of infinities? I may have read that something squared is aleph two
compared with all the integers which might be aleph one; so can you use a photon or radiation detector squared some way to hypermultiply the MWI infinity? Although the MWI might address time sequence, do pulsed lasers or standing waves alephtwoize even
though they are chrono effects

Does using that detector cause variation (wobble) at things, among them the casimir effect from some kind of physics thing? Is there a new geometry packing effect, because the technologist made an aleph two detector squared that causes multiverse to pack
together differently? is there some way to measure or mathematically predict some anisotropy that could be measured differently from both before and after the aleph two branch apparatus; this way produces three observations to detect the MWI?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)