The thing is if you say there are fields, basically entrainment, from the bunch, which is an various-sized anistropy with, among some possible characteristics being being span or duration areas at a the nonfinite distribution, having fields might cease
to utilize/be functional at utilizing or being describable with the math of probability that says there are bunches of anisotropy at a nonfinite distribution.

So anisotropy actually apparently seems to be a part of the equation, possibly though, the mechanical view of the universe (all linked causes,and even thr schroedinger equations direction of outcome pointing to the MWI) is just a bunch, and that other
bunches amongst the MWI distribution have different bunches and bunch-guided themes from different bunches, and these bunches do not yet have english or math or physics names. If MWI, even unitary MWI is viewed as a distribution, the nonfinite number of
times the spoon lands vertically could be bunched together, and the things that cause or propagate something like coherent bunching “there” mght be different than what humans experienced during the 20th century. For example, sppons could always land
vertically, at nonfinite quantities, if something absent recognition of existing carefully stood them on end. a thought is something like, kuroko (“in kabuki, the kuroko serve many of the same purposes as running crew. They move scenery and props on
stage, aiding in scene changes and costume changes. They will also often play the role of animals, will-o-the-wisps, or other roles which are played not by an actor in full costume, but by holding a prop…in order to imply that they are invisible and
not part of the action onstage”) People are near that now. Humans making AI could possibly easily have don’t-bother-to-see-it assistance and what during the 20th century would ahev been stage effects from AI guidance and matter technologies, among
them robots yet also nanotechnology. Humans are very near having AI and nanotech causing all their spoons land vertically.

Thinking about making stuff, with possible novel physical span or durability, and keeping Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons: idea around, Are there things that are absent being able to be quantum-resolved? Does making those things have technological
utility? Some things do this easily for intervals of time, like a created photon traveling a path prior to measuring is unresolved, but are there physical objects, or even just groups of atoms where it is non-possible from a logic/set theory perspective
to have them be quantum resolvable? a few types might be things that aren’t there that could be: the 1-(tunneling probability number) area where the thing is absent quantum tunneling, another could be analog things at actual physics: the electron or
atom considered as having spherical analog coordinates around it, and a photon emission,or even a nuclear nucleus fissioning event, that causes an analog, nonfinite possible path; an analog thing might be nonpossible to “accurately” observe or
resolve.

I read at quora that electrons are what you see when you observe a field, so if you stack a lot of unobserved fields on each other, technologically like with big lasers or something, could you heighten field concentration such that it produces
somethingthat obtrudes onto consciousness. like for those versions of quantum mechanics that value a human observer, the field does something so loud, if a human exists, anywhere, they notice and observe it? That is like a novel logic area of
observation-doing-something to me.

Ithinkthe universe was created.

, another could be things that are absent possibility of detection. then there might be things that are near absent being able tobe quantum resolved like neutrinos, perhaps there is a neutrino type which is so noninteracting that it would take longer
than the “20th century physics universe” was expected to exist, or require more matter than the 20th century universe could containto detect/interact with; another possibility isvariationson the wave function of the universe, as a wave function ithas
a wavelength,sojust naming a wavelength twice as big might be nondetectable,at least at some resolution (I have heard of 1/4 wave antennas so even multiplications of the size/wavelength of the universal wave functionmight be detectable)

(interestingly, people have already noticed that there are apparently different actual things, evenif they happen to be shaped concentrations of homogenous stuff, like electrons, or that thing I read on quora that said there are fields and electrons just
happen to occur when you look at a field)
(although non coherent could also be possible, it is just that universe groups where the spoon lands vertical a few million times in a row, seem, at least at first, to suggest coherent bunch-effect)

I have not read about questions 20th century humans, even the most intelligent humans, cannot comprehend, and might only be able to even ask with software that generates the questions; Like I can say “it seems possible to figure out geometry expansions
of aleph numbers”, but there are simple core ideas I simply cannot think of. Software, and thus possibly AI can read, and then work on questions that go beyond human, that is people’s ability to ask, and then the answers could be used to benefit
humans, that is people, and make technologies.



that are . (can MWI technology experiments purposefully generate aleph number equations that make an upward parabola vase or sphere? How about a gideon’s trumpet?)

anA size of unitary MWI electron bandwidth emission (color) event could generate a mathematically nonfinite, possibly a particular size namable amount of infinity like aleph one to be generated from a 360 sphere version of an electron to emitted.

The 360 photon emissions event and its photon re-emission causes MWI, possibly also unitary MWI, to have an all possible photons at all possible electron locations, at all the enumerable electrons size of the unitary MWI

Refutations of infinity or sizes of infinity could then affect the struture of aleph numbers and thus MWI unity at some simplest possible thing like set theory or Functors (or forgetful-functor system/structures ) statments of the math of unitary MWI.

Also technologically testable could be at thing, or another thing which is if every letter at the schoedinger equation are some, but not others of those letters, is the schoedinger equation still supported. nonfinite letters would lmit the size, or
restate the unitary MWI.

Another infinity is the evaluation of a an arbitrarily large numers of math equation at a sentient gazer, or notably a macroscopic gazer big enough to view a data-meessage with sperable bits or equation letters. “hey, give looking over this equation
once at a computer base, or humna equation generator makes nonfinite math for a sentieince to solve.

technology thing: one neuron, possibly with a physiociculating metalloporphyrin, is illuminated with a quantum linked photon; the illumination effects the electron distribution of the atom, which bends/effects a neuron’s chemistry, which then affects a
retinal-cytes output, which is then an an actual observed photon.

The pleasant thing about his is that a cognitive being or nonconscious computer could use any of tested neuron component of Dave “scrhoedinger’s neuron” theory, different nonfinite unitary MRI (I think), restructuralizations of infinite/nonfite
amounts, standing quantum wave, to build a hedonisting imperative causing and creating and apllied technology

Also, notably, I have already experienced a time technology, suggesting that sentiences at a unity-or less amount sized amount could build a hedonistic imperative an nonfinite lifespan number of preexisting MWI universes;




IF size

Could those areas of the brain that respond to transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) be particularly easy to reach with photonic stimulkation of photostimulatable drugs because of the near area of the tisuue and the less tissue that the photons have to
travel through?

Better plywood and particle board: Wikipedia describes ural-formaldehyde glue at particle board and plywood; It is possible that what might be thriftier, although I have no idea if it would be better as a material is to genetically engineer or breed wood
plants like some trees to make much more sap or resin, then find a free radical catalysts that turns the new larger amount of resin to a structurally functional glue

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)