[continued from previous message]

I may have read that things like electrons and photons are actually fields, and that observing them causes a kind of concentration measurable as presence, such as the presence of a particle or a wave arising from the field; so are there other things that
can be done to existing fields to make more than electron-or-photon-produced quantities of MWI branches from perturbing, changing the shape of, merging or dividing, fields? One far out idea: Some molecule, when placed at an EM field, that causes much
more field concentration than, or perhaps causative of multiple point or wave effects.

An very unlikely source of more-MWI-branches than the sun could be vacuum energy generation between two plates; the casimir effect; If a person puts a metal plate between Jupiter and Neptune, the casimir system between the jupiter plate and the neptune
plate has half the diameter, so it produces some new amount of casimir-effect energy and particles, say it doubles or halves. So, does this work on stellar objects and interstellar distances? If you put a plate between the sun and stellar object rigel,
do you get half or double the amount of casimir effect energy, and is it a really big amount of casimir effect energy because the other two plates are stellar sized big? I have a perception that the eentsier the distance the higher the casimir effect
energy though, so rather than big far things, perhaps eentsy things near each other might make more energy and thus more MWI branches. It is possible that eentsy gravitational singularities, even though I think I read that they evaporate rapidly, might
squish things together nearer than any other matter system; it could be that even though their contents are outside an observation horizon, that they have extremely high casimir particle and energy generation from things there being nearer to each other
than, perhaps, the parts of a nucleus are from the other parts of nucleus. So, theoretically things like particle accelerators, or possibly some other technologies I have thought of, could generate eentsy gravitational singularities, and these could
then mass-produce MWI branches from causing things to be near each other.


quantum entangled photons seem to possibly have *less* MWI branches as modifying one determines the other, whereas if they were non-dependent there would be twice as much quantum different occurence MWI branchability. So is there a way to make hyper non-
entangled photons? These might have greater difficulty of observation; giant wavelengths bigger than a planet might not be “collapsible” with any human observation to go from being fields to being observed as waves or particles So perhaps then there
is some new “multipoint” or “multiwave” field collapse of the bigger than a planet wavelength energy possible.

It might be possible to make a reflecting shape that causes fields, that when observed “cause” particles or waves, to be different shapes. Different shapes fields might make different amounts of MWI branches. Like a 1 cm thing wiggling at water,
makes 1 cm waves. but if it is next to a wall, and you get the timing functional, can make, I think waves that are many cm tall, from reinforcement, also a little like pumping a recreational swing.

If presumably they figure out if, or what kind, of observers matter, if the observers do matter, could a superobserver (a computer/IC like technology, possibly vastly multiparallel that is more effective at observing than a human; previously described)
or even just a human observer view a really big, rich, unresolved, or preresolution field, possibly as a group, “a glance”, to cause field identities, like photons or electrons, much larger in amount of MWI branches than some other object, like the
sun. One vaugely weirds-a-person-out example is the 2019 AD photonic image of a gravitational singularity. Does observing that thing have an effect on all the mass it has previously absorbed? What is the effect on that mass and its MWI branches.

Previously described are nested MWI universe technologies (optical loop around radioactive blob, or two optical loops of different lengths); could an MWI nesting technology create a contingent effect on a massive pile of energy or matter somewhere, at a
dsitance, like space? One clueless one: put the light from a quasar into an optical loop using a collimating lens, then have another optical loop with like one photon traveling physically around that at a bigger loop, where the time-to-detect the one
photon is larger than the collimated quasar photon loop interval. The lighcone of the two loops overlaps, and part of the lightcones are outside each other; (I do not remember the rest of this)


Less weirding-out-of-a person is the possibility that observing something really white and big, perhaps a quasar, causes some topology of MWI branches to occur.


it is possible that the genetics of the 99th percentile of human well being, regardless of the society that human is located at could be combined with 99th percentile of societal well being to produce a physical location to gather gamete as well as stem
cell culture samples at.

Other mathematical things that provide benefit:

If you encourage casual retrocausal usage of new gametes like sperm, eggs or tissue culture, then many more varities of improved well being branches occur.

Technology that enhances architectural objects:
I viewed a video about a three dimensional printer that printed what looked like a dwelling with cement coming out of a nozzle. A technological improvement to this could be producing cement-air foam at the nozzle, the cement foam would have higher R
value from the air that is part of the cement foam. Another possible improvement to 3d printed archtectural objects is to print calcium sulfate from a nozzle, Calcium sulfate is the majority chemical in wallboard. 3D printing calcium sulfate shapes
like sides of walls, curves, rounded areas would create better aesthetics at the architectural object while also being a building material with some known characteristics; also as wallboard is cardboard clad calcium sulfate, it is possible a 3d printer
could, among its materials that are nozzle-capable, have a printable material, possibly a polymer, that would replace the cardboard-like cladding at the 3d printed calcium sulfate; it is also possible that 3d printed calcium sulfate items could have a
central area with many air spaces, and then have a hole gradient that goes to 100% calcium sulfate at the outer surface. The benefit is that this produces a high R value calcium sulfate building material, improving dwelling or other architectural object
comfort and increasing energy efficiency.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)