Longevity technology: Hordenine is a MAO-B inhibitor, thus possibly it has longevity effects like deprenyl. One thing online says, “[at hordenine] dimethylated version of Tyramine (the amino acid). Commonly found in herbal supplements, it is used as an
effective MAO-B inhibitor’ Some organisms naturaylly produce hordenine, “has also been detected in some algae and fungi” Copying the hordenine producing gene or heightening the activity of a methylating enzyme on tyramine seems likely to less
difficult/easier than producing an entire deprenyl small molecule. So screening hordenine and molecular variants as a longevity drug makes sense.

Hordenine effects “taar” like phenylethylamine (PEA) so might block/amplify PEA effects. “In a study of the effects of a large number of compounds on a rat trace amine receptor (rTAR1) expressed in HEK 293 cells, hordenine, at a concentration of 1 �
�M, had almost identical potency to that of the same concentration of β-phenethylamine in stimulating cAMP production through the rTAR1. The potency of tyramine in this receptor preparation was slightly higher than that of hordenine.”

Hordenine could reduce harm to plants or crops from insects, “Hordenine has been found to act as a feeding deterrent to grasshoppers (Melanoplus bivittatus),[38] and to caterpillars of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa; the estimated
concentration of hordenine that reduced feeding duration to 50% of control was 0.4M for H. virescens and 0.08M for H. subflexa.[39]” suggesting possible value to genetically engineering it into leaves and awns.

math entertainment “in essence, differentiable learning involves a single, enormous mathematical function--a much more sophisticated version of a high school calculus equation--arranged as a neural network, with each component of the network feeding
information forward and backward” https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-04/hms-fr041619.php makes me think of a math function with simultaneous action, and the “feeding information forward and backward” part being like, or suggesting that:
also: just as some equations might use a minimal definition of time, there could be different minimal definitions of time, and some of these versions of time could have different effects and intrinsic forms; so like a matrix that updates from the edge
toward the center might have different step number than a linear raster scan; and some topologies of time style are non-reducible to (arrangements of linear rays). Then there is my perception of how some equations have instantaneous solutions, while
others have iterable solutions; iterations, and iteration style reminds me of different styles of time; At different nonreducible styles of time some math things could be described, or perhaps solved, with just one, just two, or several, iterations that
use a different style of time. Like x=y^3 is instantly solved as a graph, or can be iterated to find values as a plug-in function; So at a different shape or style of time x=y^3 could be iterated using the novel time form/style twice or 7 times to
produce a solved system, like my perception of that equation being fully present/solved as just a visual graph.

It is possible to see how different styles of time, iterate at a different quantity of events to produce a math value. Reminds me of a wavelet being a wave representation/solving a wave in less chunks than a fourier transform. So there could be some
new computer science in the realm of new styles of time that iterate equations and programs differently. Also, they could look to physics to find naturally occuring time styles that are novel or new to computer science and math.

Perhaps parsimonious descriptions of these different styles of time could be made, and then physics looked at to see if some things like photons or particles have different parsimoniously stated ideas or styles of time. Then there could be math-thought
and actual equations about what it means when two kinds or styles of time overlap, or meet each other. Sort of like two fourier waves can meet each other, or a fourier can meet a wavelet, or a fourier can meet a square wave: parsimoniusly stated and
different time styles could meet each other, like the very predictable, linear meets parallel update of a grid or matrix like #, or better, as part of time style have the plural object or variable system expand from center, or concentrically narrow from
perimeter; There are many possible different parsimonious time styles that could have mathematical development as well as be searched for at actual physics: also the minimum iteration topology/shape definition that causes a turing tape machine or a 1,1,0
automata sequence to advance and “do” could be another style of time. A new time more-than-sequence/geometry style one-fold topology like a mobius strip could contain a novel time style, much less complex than a time style-topology as well as
topological space of a turing machine. SO there could be all these math-like definitions of topologies of time that are non-reducible to each other, that is they are fundamental components, and then they could study what happens when these styles of
time meet each other; They would also look at observed physics to see if any actual things have mutually observed and potentially also mathematically exclusive time styles.

Things with mutually exclusive time styles might be definitionally unable to interact, reminds me of a new technological thing like the light cone yet possibly baseable in a much wider range of actual physics materials. Thermal or electrical, integrated
circuit at computer, insulators. You could make something that was noneraseable even with linear ray vector time, which the 20th century AD seemed to think was usual. a novel kind of permanance. Handy at nanotechnology for longevity/system maintenance
to identicality.
Likewise you could make something that was more erasable at a wider number of parsimoniously different time styles. That could have novel entropy effects, and just being a bit literal, could possibly cause higher energy density at chemical systems with
multi time-style easy erasability.

What is the effect of new styles of time at Claude Shannon’s things like highest effective error codes/error reduction codes when a parsimoniously defined time style goes beyond the interator or vector ray version (just one of a plurality of possible
time styles) that people used to think about chronoprogression and or/compuiteration and/or instantaneous solution of a function, when though about with Shannon’s intellectual content.

Thinking Shannon, new math based on time styles could be possible that effects computers and the structure of knowledge like probability. Updating probability could improve scientific research and engineering.

Different parsimonious time styles could possibly effect relativity, making groovy new technological relativity shapes, as relativity equations might work differently on time styles comparing linear ray, than on a concentric modification matrix (possibly
the time form of passing a sphere through a sheet), or a minimal time motioning topology of a 1,1,0 automata, and the nifty idea applying relativity to the time styles of waving back and forth, tide-like that is a parsimonious time style (and might be
physically at the delayed quantum choice eraser)

Basically a version or time style (possibly mathematically bigger definition, perhaps a little like the thing/hole pair of phonon math which has back and forth described in one equation) sequence, like two parallel track bidirectional sequence, or one
track that can go back and forth) (phonon math version) where back and forth (slish slosh) is a normal, equation-described part of that time object definition. Just as an aside, time reversability at things like delayed quantum choice eraser, could be
described mathematically with equations to make slish-slosh time object description (found in physics/nature), as a technological application then that slish-slosh math object could be applied to neural network node topologies to deposit/accumulate/form/
create object-value at their node composition.

I have no idea what a slish-slosh parsimonious time style or other parsimonius new time styles would mean to relativity, or the technology chapes that can be made with relativity, (among them observer-frame simulaneity and non-simultaneity coexisting)

Slish-slosh time style makes me think of neural network nodes being updated, as a particular object form at a time style, “arranged as a neural network, with each component of the network feeding information forward and backward” Basically a version
of time or sequence where back and forth (slish slosh) is a normal, equation-described part of that time style object definition. Could a slish-slosh time style math improve the math and function of neural networks? Being extreme, could actual
different observed physics of different time-styles, note and create value at, natural slish-slosh systems being used at new technology of neural network computers, and possibly integrated circuit matter compositions; during 2019 AD, at photonics the
delayed quantum choice eraser could easily be modified to be an oscillating precausal system that slish sloshes data at a neural network node geometry/computer program.

Just as an aside, time reversability at things like delayed quantum choice eraser, could be described mathematically with equations to make slish-slosh time style object description (found in physics/nature), this could heighten efficiency of computer
software as well as the computer-actually-made-of matter, that slish-slosh math style object could be applied to neural network node topologies to deposit/accumulate/form/create node-object-value at their node composition. Basically it could make nerual
networks, better, faster, more descriptive of the task, as well as more mathematically and topologically diverse in a way that supports applications, notably as a technology as well as a nifty math thing.

What if it was possible to develop a better, more-changing-at-each-“limned function”-occurence-of-activity, form of time style from the existing math of slish-slosh? Something better than the first, initially figured out, and equationally described,
slish-slosh?

Along with the awesome math, Slish-slosh2 could be a new kind of computer clock (perhaps replace the word “clock” there with “active chronotopology”) Also, a new way to address the actual physical things on integrated circuits that would produce
more time goodiness out of the possibly measurable energy input that becomes/instantiates the new form of time style used to chronotopology-drive (formerly “clock”) the knowledge modifying and generating technology, MGT (previous word for MGTis kind
of: computer, but”computer” might be a word that previously impliedmath forms with ray-like time style sequence of solving.) or put the previous way: The new time styles produce technologizable actual things that replace computer clocks and
architecture; these actual things make the computers do the equivalent of solving the previously unsolvable, going faster, or being more reliable (Shannon), loading up neural network nodes with cheap identity production/reweighting. among various
possible improvements)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)