• 60 million years of penguin evolution

    From Pandora@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 19 18:49:01 2022
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Pandora on Tue Jul 19 10:33:02 2022
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9

    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to jharshman@pacbell.net on Tue Jul 19 21:02:31 2022
    On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:33:02 -0700, John Harshman
    <jharshman@pacbell.net> wrote:

    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9

    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    Spheniscus mendiculus narrowly made it to the northern hemisphere on
    Isabela in the Galapagos Islands. Why so far north? Something to do
    with the cold Humboldt Current?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Tue Jul 19 13:29:12 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New Zealand
    had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites in the
    Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Tue Jul 19 16:39:21 2022
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess. >>
    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New Zealand
    had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites in the
    Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a
    lumper.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Tue Jul 19 18:20:21 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the >>> framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic >>> signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might >>> have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in >>> birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how >>> penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role. >> Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Tue Jul 19 18:56:10 2022
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the >>>>> framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify >>>>> key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic >>>>> signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might >>>>> have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic >>>>> ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in >>>>> birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how >>>>> penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess. >>>>
    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role. >>>> Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?

    They were not. Word up?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Tue Jul 19 19:25:52 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the >>>>> framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify >>>>> key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic >>>>> signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during >>>>> major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might >>>>> have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic >>>>> ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group >>>>> (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in >>>>> birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how >>>>> penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a >> lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Tue Jul 19 21:07:11 2022
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, >>>>>>> subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the >>>>>>> framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify >>>>>>> key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic >>>>>>> signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during >>>>>>> major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes >>>>>>> potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might >>>>>>> have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic >>>>>>> ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group >>>>>>> (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in >>>>>>> birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how >>>>>>> penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role. >>>>>> Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a >>>> lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight supposed
    to be about?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Wed Jul 20 11:05:55 2022
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, >>>>>>> subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify >>>>>>> key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during >>>>>>> major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes >>>>>>> potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic >>>>>>> ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group >>>>>>> (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern >>>>>> hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a >>>> lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what is actually said, like what or who is "they"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Wed Jul 20 13:49:46 2022
    On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, >>>>>>>>> subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify >>>>>>>>> key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic >>>>>>>>> signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during >>>>>>>>> major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes >>>>>>>>> potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>>>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic >>>>>>>>> ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group >>>>>>>>> (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how >>>>>>>>> penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>>>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth.

    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>>>>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late
    Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern >>>>>>>> hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a >>>>>> lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what is actually said, like what or who is "they"?

    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few
    miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in
    the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all:
    Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is supposed to
    be about?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Thu Jul 21 00:51:12 2022
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, >>>>>>>>> subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes >>>>>>>>> potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>>>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>>>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>>>>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern >>>>>>>> hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight supposed >> to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few
    miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in
    the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all: Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one: "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Thu Jul 21 06:27:28 2022
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of penguins >>>>>>>>>>>
    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years ago, >>>>>>>>>>> subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization during >>>>>>>>>>> major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of genes >>>>>>>>>>> potentially underpinning adaptations related to thermoregulation, >>>>>>>>>>> oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their sister group >>>>>>>>>>> (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, successfully >>>>>>>>>>> colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group Neornithes (or >>>>>>>>>> Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the northern >>>>>>>>>> hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of New
    Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds found at numerous sites
    in the Northern Hemisphere, named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/
    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight supposed >>>> to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few
    miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in
    the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all:
    Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one: "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call penguins
    today, the name was originally attached to a flightless alcid, now
    extinct. Not clear?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trolidan7@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Thu Jul 21 13:08:39 2022
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread refugia/recolonization >>>>>>>>>>>> during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to
    thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to an >>>>>>>>>>>> aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our
    understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment,
    successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group
    Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at a >>>>>>>>>>> rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study published >>>>>>>>>> in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary
    Research has determined that the renowned giant penguins of >>>>>>>>>> New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, the United >>>>>>>>>> States and Canada. The researchers identified shocking
    similarities between the fossilized bones of the giant New >>>>>>>>>> Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group of birds >>>>>>>>>> found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, named
    plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally
    found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu
    mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight
    supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what is
    actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few
    miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in
    the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all:
    Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is supposed to >>> be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one:
    "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless alcid, now
    extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.

    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly,
    and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.

    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?

    How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?

    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly? Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults. The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 21 13:19:33 2022
    On 7/21/22 1:08 PM, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread
    refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to
    thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to >>>>>>>>>>>>> an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our
    understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, >>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9
    This has implications for the age of the crown group
    Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at >>>>>>>>>>>> a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study
    published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and
    Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant >>>>>>>>>>> penguins of New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, >>>>>>>>>>> the United States and Canada. The researchers identified >>>>>>>>>>> shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the >>>>>>>>>>> giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group >>>>>>>>>>> of birds found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, >>>>>>>>>>> named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally
    found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu
    mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight
    supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what
    is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few
    miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in >>>> the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all:
    Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is
    supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one:
    "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call
    penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless
    alcid, now extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.

    Depends on what you mean by "fly". Sometimes it's said that they fly
    through the water. Flippers are wings, after all. But no, they can't fly
    in the air.

    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly,
    and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.

    Penguins do this only to the degree that dolphins do. That is, they
    "porpoise". I don't think it increases speed, but it may reduce the
    energy needed to maintain a particular speed.

    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?

    No. Flying fish don't do it either. Their propulsion in the air comes
    from swishing their tails in the water just before they fully take off.

    How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?

    By swimming fast and being highly maneuverable in the water.

    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly?

    Wild turkeys can. I'll bet that a lot of domestic turkeys can't.

      Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults.  The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?

    I have no direct knowledge of that, but they would have to, since it's
    their primary sense in both environments.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Thu Jul 21 15:04:31 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 1:08 PM, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>> On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread
    refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to
    thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to >>>>>>>>>>>>> an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our
    understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, >>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9 >>>>>>>>>>>> This has implications for the age of the crown group >>>>>>>>>>>> Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at >>>>>>>>>>>> a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study
    published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and >>>>>>>>>>> Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant >>>>>>>>>>> penguins of New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, >>>>>>>>>>> the United States and Canada. The researchers identified >>>>>>>>>>> shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the >>>>>>>>>>> giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group >>>>>>>>>>> of birds found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, >>>>>>>>>>> named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally >>>>>>> found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu >>>>>>> mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight
    supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what >>>>> is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few >>>> miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in >>>> the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all: >>>> Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is
    supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one:
    "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call
    penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless
    alcid, now extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.
    Depends on what you mean by "fly". Sometimes it's said that they fly
    through the water. Flippers are wings, after all. But no, they can't fly
    in the air.
    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly,
    and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.
    Penguins do this only to the degree that dolphins do. That is, they "porpoise". I don't think it increases speed, but it may reduce the
    energy needed to maintain a particular speed.
    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?
    No. Flying fish don't do it either. Their propulsion in the air comes
    from swishing their tails in the water just before they fully take off.
    How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?
    By swimming fast and being highly maneuverable in the water.
    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly?
    Wild turkeys can. I'll bet that a lot of domestic turkeys can't.
    Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults. The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?
    I have no direct knowledge of that, but they would have to, since it's
    their primary sense in both environments.

    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Thu Jul 21 16:50:50 2022
    On 7/21/22 3:04 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 1:08 PM, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread
    refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to
    thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has implications for the age of the crown group >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up?

    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study >>>>>>>>>>>>> published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant >>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins of New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, >>>>>>>>>>>>> the United States and Canada. The researchers identified >>>>>>>>>>>>> shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group >>>>>>>>>>>>> of birds found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, >>>>>>>>>>>>> named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I >>>>>>>>>>>> remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally >>>>>>>>> found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu >>>>>>>>> mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight >>>>>>>> supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what >>>>>>> is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos
    penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few >>>>>> miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in >>>>>> the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all: >>>>>> Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is
    supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one:
    "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call
    penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless
    alcid, now extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.
    Depends on what you mean by "fly". Sometimes it's said that they fly
    through the water. Flippers are wings, after all. But no, they can't fly
    in the air.
    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly,
    and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.
    Penguins do this only to the degree that dolphins do. That is, they
    "porpoise". I don't think it increases speed, but it may reduce the
    energy needed to maintain a particular speed.
    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?
    No. Flying fish don't do it either. Their propulsion in the air comes
    from swishing their tails in the water just before they fully take off.
    How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?
    By swimming fast and being highly maneuverable in the water.
    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly?
    Wild turkeys can. I'll bet that a lot of domestic turkeys can't.
    Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults. The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?
    I have no direct knowledge of that, but they would have to, since it's
    their primary sense in both environments.

    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.

    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Thu Jul 21 19:05:12 2022
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 4:50:57 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 3:04 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 1:08 PM, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread
    refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has implications for the age of the crown group >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study >>>>>>>>>>>>> published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and >>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant >>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins of New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, >>>>>>>>>>>>> the United States and Canada. The researchers identified >>>>>>>>>>>>> shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group >>>>>>>>>>>>> of birds found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, >>>>>>>>>>>>> named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep?

    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally >>>>>>>>> found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu >>>>>>>>> mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight >>>>>>>> supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what >>>>>>> is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos >>>>>> penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few >>>>>> miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in
    the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all: >>>>>> Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is
    supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one: >>>>> "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call
    penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless
    alcid, now extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.
    Depends on what you mean by "fly". Sometimes it's said that they fly
    through the water. Flippers are wings, after all. But no, they can't fly >> in the air.
    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly,
    and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.
    Penguins do this only to the degree that dolphins do. That is, they
    "porpoise". I don't think it increases speed, but it may reduce the
    energy needed to maintain a particular speed.
    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?
    No. Flying fish don't do it either. Their propulsion in the air comes
    from swishing their tails in the water just before they fully take off. >>> How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?
    By swimming fast and being highly maneuverable in the water.
    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly?
    Wild turkeys can. I'll bet that a lot of domestic turkeys can't.
    Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults. The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?
    I have no direct knowledge of that, but they would have to, since it's
    their primary sense in both environments.

    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Thu Jul 21 20:07:55 2022
    On 7/21/22 7:05 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 4:50:57 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 3:04 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, July 21, 2022 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 1:08 PM, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/21/22 6:27 AM, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/21/22 12:51 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/20/22 11:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 9:07:18 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 7:25 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 6:56:16 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/19/22 6:20 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 1:29 PM, Glenn wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 10:33:09 AM UTC-7, John Harshman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On 7/19/22 9:49 AM, Pandora wrote:
    Genomic insights into the secondary aquatic transition of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins

    Abstract

    Penguins lost the ability to fly more than 60 million years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago,
    subsequently evolving a hyper-specialized marine body plan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within the
    framework of a genome-scale, fossil-inclusive phylogeny, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
    key geological events that shaped penguin diversification >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and genomic
    signatures consistent with widespread
    refugia/recolonization during
    major climate oscillations. We further identify a suite of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> genes
    potentially underpinning adaptations related to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thermoregulation,
    oxygenation, diving, vision, diet, immunity and body size, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which might
    have facilitated their remarkable secondary transition to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an aquatic
    ecology. Our analyses indicate that penguins and their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sister group
    (Procellariiformes) have the lowest evolutionary rates yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected in
    birds. Together, these findings help improve our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understanding of how
    penguins have transitioned to the marine environment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully
    colonizing some of the most extreme environments on Earth. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Open access:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31508-9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has implications for the age of the crown group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neornithes (or
    Aves, as I prefer), suggesting something far back in the Late >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cretaceous. Not sure exactly, but it should exceed 120ma at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a rough guess.

    Interesting to speculate why they never made it into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> northern
    hemisphere, where first plotopterids and then alcids assumed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their role.
    Why didn't any procellariiforms ever take it up? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    "New research has revealed that it was not just New Zealand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that provided a home for giant marine birds. A study >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published in the Journal of Zoological Systematics and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Evolutionary Research has determined that the renowned giant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penguins of New Zealand had northern doppelgängers in Japan, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the United States and Canada. The researchers identified >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shocking similarities between the fossilized bones of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giant New Zealand penguins and those of a much younger group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of birds found at numerous sites in the Northern Hemisphere, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named plotopterids."

    https://conservation.reefcause.com/giant-penguin-like-seabirds-fossils-discovered-in-northern-hemisphere/

    Yep. Plotopterids are neither penguins nor procellariiforms. If I
    remember they're supposed to be suliforms, or pelecaniforms if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're a
    lumper.


    Were they brudder to da Hoatzin?
    They were not. Word up?

    So "they" never made it to the Northern Hemisphere, yep? >>>>>>>>>>>
    "Of the 18 penguin species on earth, only one is occasionally >>>>>>>>>>> found north of the equator – the Galapagos Penguin (Spheniscu >>>>>>>>>>> mediculus)."

    If you're trying to start some kind of fight, what's the fight >>>>>>>>>> supposed
    to be about?

    So it is alright that you don't answer questions and address what >>>>>>>>> is actually said, like what or who is "they"?
    I was of course referring to penguins. Technically, the Galapagos >>>>>>>> penguin did make it into the norther hemisphere, though only by a few >>>>>>>> miles. The point is that they never got to the fine penguin habitat in >>>>>>>> the arctic. Then again, the original penguin isn't a penguin at all: >>>>>>>> Pinguinus impennis, the great auk. Is that what the fight is
    supposed to
    be about?

    What fight is that? I think you've outdone yourself with that one: >>>>>>> "The original penguin isn't a penguin at all".

    The point is that before Europeans knew about the birds we call
    penguins today, the name was originally attached to a flightless
    alcid, now extinct. Not clear?

    So basic question.

    Do penguins actually fly or not.
    Depends on what you mean by "fly". Sometimes it's said that they fly
    through the water. Flippers are wings, after all. But no, they can't fly >>>> in the air.
    The abstract of the article seems to imply that penguins do not fly, >>>>> and their flippers seem to be more adapted to propelling penguins
    through water.

    Nonetheless I think of the flying fish and the fact that they
    propel themselves above water in order to increase their speed
    when trying to escape predators since there is less drag in
    air than in water.
    Penguins do this only to the degree that dolphins do. That is, they
    "porpoise". I don't think it increases speed, but it may reduce the
    energy needed to maintain a particular speed.
    In terms of weight, even the heaviest penguins are much lighter
    than larger sharks, cetaceans, and many bony fish, and since
    the ocean is generally a food chain with microscopic phytoplankton
    on the bottom, the ability to flee predators in the open ocean
    would seem to me to be a critical factor concerning the viability
    for penguin survival if long distance flight is lost.

    So include propelling above water to increase speed as 'flying'.
    Can penguins do that?
    No. Flying fish don't do it either. Their propulsion in the air comes
    from swishing their tails in the water just before they fully take off. >>>>> How do penguins flee predators in the open ocean?
    By swimming fast and being highly maneuverable in the water.
    This is inspired by me surfing through Wikipedia and noticing
    that it has a chart that says that the heaviest bird that has
    flight is the turkey.

    Can either wild turkeys or domestic turkeys fly?
    Wild turkeys can. I'll bet that a lot of domestic turkeys can't.
    Wikipedia
    seems to give the idea that turkeys can, and they weigh only
    slightly less than the emperor penguin as adults. The smallest
    cetaceans as adults might weigh only slightly less than the
    emperor penguin, but there are also smaller and less heavy
    penguins.

    Can the eyes of penguins focus well in air, water, or both?
    I have no direct knowledge of that, but they would have to, since it's >>>> their primary sense in both environments.

    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.

    Fast swimmers, those guys.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to eastside.erik@gmail.com on Mon Jul 25 03:16:10 2022
    On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.


    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to 69jp...@gmail.com on Mon Jul 25 08:49:03 2022
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trolidan7@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Mon Jul 25 15:32:47 2022
    On 7/25/22 8:49 AM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers.

    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.

    You know looking up the article on the leopard seal it gave the
    idea that the seals do vocalization under water.

    The middle ear of mammals generally exists to amplify sound in
    air, but I get the idea that in mammals most underwater sound is
    picked up from the jaw and skull for most land mammals.

    A while ago I wondered about the possibility of computer interfaces
    to transmit and collect and interpret sounds from cetaceans.

    I also wondered about what cetacean would be most ideal to send into
    space.

    At that point I noticed that the bottlenose dolphin was different
    from the common dolphin, and there are smaller dolphins than the
    common dolphin. In the last surf I noticed that there were river
    dolphins in Asia as well as South America. It does not seem obvious
    to me what the smallest cetacean species is. There are several small
    ones that weigh as adults about 2/3rds the mass of an average adult
    human. I am thinking from some surfs that the smaller dolphins have
    an average brain mass of about 3/4ths that of an average adult human
    but humans vary in their brain volume from about 800cc to over 2500cc.

    To the best of my understanding, I am thinking their temporal lobes
    are relatively more developed since the temporal lobe is generally
    involved with the processing of sound.

    I do not know if dolphins or whales or seals have a middle ear, or
    what the capabilities of their vision is. Maybe all mammals do
    have a middle ear or only some do. Probably most textbooks would
    say that they do for the purpose of simplification.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 25 16:17:08 2022
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 3:32:50 PM UTC-7, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/25/22 8:49 AM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers. >>>
    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.
    You know looking up the article on the leopard seal it gave the
    idea that the seals do vocalization under water.

    The middle ear of mammals generally exists to amplify sound in
    air, but I get the idea that in mammals most underwater sound is
    picked up from the jaw and skull for most land mammals.

    A while ago I wondered about the possibility of computer interfaces
    to transmit and collect and interpret sounds from cetaceans.

    I also wondered about what cetacean would be most ideal to send into
    space.

    At that point I noticed that the bottlenose dolphin was different
    from the common dolphin, and there are smaller dolphins than the
    common dolphin. In the last surf I noticed that there were river
    dolphins in Asia as well as South America. It does not seem obvious
    to me what the smallest cetacean species is. There are several small
    ones that weigh as adults about 2/3rds the mass of an average adult
    human. I am thinking from some surfs that the smaller dolphins have
    an average brain mass of about 3/4ths that of an average adult human
    but humans vary in their brain volume from about 800cc to over 2500cc.

    To the best of my understanding, I am thinking their temporal lobes
    are relatively more developed since the temporal lobe is generally
    involved with the processing of sound.

    I do not know if dolphins or whales or seals have a middle ear, or
    what the capabilities of their vision is. Maybe all mammals do
    have a middle ear or only some do. Probably most textbooks would
    say that they do for the purpose of simplification.

    Cetaceans in space? Douglas Adams had one (came to a bad end). Whatever for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trolidan7@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Mon Jul 25 23:50:19 2022
    On 7/25/22 4:17 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 3:32:50 PM UTC-7, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/25/22 8:49 AM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers. >>>>>
    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.
    You know looking up the article on the leopard seal it gave the
    idea that the seals do vocalization under water.

    The middle ear of mammals generally exists to amplify sound in
    air, but I get the idea that in mammals most underwater sound is
    picked up from the jaw and skull for most land mammals.

    A while ago I wondered about the possibility of computer interfaces
    to transmit and collect and interpret sounds from cetaceans.

    I also wondered about what cetacean would be most ideal to send into
    space.

    At that point I noticed that the bottlenose dolphin was different
    from the common dolphin, and there are smaller dolphins than the
    common dolphin. In the last surf I noticed that there were river
    dolphins in Asia as well as South America. It does not seem obvious
    to me what the smallest cetacean species is. There are several small
    ones that weigh as adults about 2/3rds the mass of an average adult
    human. I am thinking from some surfs that the smaller dolphins have
    an average brain mass of about 3/4ths that of an average adult human
    but humans vary in their brain volume from about 800cc to over 2500cc.

    To the best of my understanding, I am thinking their temporal lobes
    are relatively more developed since the temporal lobe is generally
    involved with the processing of sound.

    I do not know if dolphins or whales or seals have a middle ear, or
    what the capabilities of their vision is. Maybe all mammals do
    have a middle ear or only some do. Probably most textbooks would
    say that they do for the purpose of simplification.

    Cetaceans in space? Douglas Adams had one (came to a bad end). Whatever for?

    Maybe that would depend somewhat on what a cetacean communicating
    with a computer and robot could do.

    Water still boils in a vacuum and the dolphins breathe air but it is not obvious whether a water matrix and pressure differences during diving
    in many ocean environments would make dolphins any more or less
    resistant than humans to emergency situations in space.

    The lighter cetaceans would not weigh any more than a human astronaut,
    but water tanks and apparatus dealing with water leaks could be an
    extra weight factor.

    Who knows. I could not find much however on attempts to get computers
    to do something like sound recognition and send info back with speakers
    in water or computer screens in water (in a pool on Earth) anyway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daud Deden@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 26 02:31:23 2022
    On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 2:50:22 AM UTC-4, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/25/22 4:17 PM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 3:32:50 PM UTC-7, Trolidan7 wrote:
    On 7/25/22 8:49 AM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers. >>>>>
    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.
    You know looking up the article on the leopard seal it gave the
    idea that the seals do vocalization under water.

    The middle ear of mammals generally exists to amplify sound in
    air, but I get the idea that in mammals most underwater sound is
    picked up from the jaw and skull for most land mammals.

    A while ago I wondered about the possibility of computer interfaces
    to transmit and collect and interpret sounds from cetaceans.

    I also wondered about what cetacean would be most ideal to send into
    space.

    At that point I noticed that the bottlenose dolphin was different
    from the common dolphin, and there are smaller dolphins than the
    common dolphin. In the last surf I noticed that there were river
    dolphins in Asia as well as South America. It does not seem obvious
    to me what the smallest cetacean species is. There are several small
    ones that weigh as adults about 2/3rds the mass of an average adult
    human. I am thinking from some surfs that the smaller dolphins have
    an average brain mass of about 3/4ths that of an average adult human
    but humans vary in their brain volume from about 800cc to over 2500cc.

    To the best of my understanding, I am thinking their temporal lobes
    are relatively more developed since the temporal lobe is generally
    involved with the processing of sound.

    I do not know if dolphins or whales or seals have a middle ear, or
    what the capabilities of their vision is. Maybe all mammals do
    have a middle ear or only some do. Probably most textbooks would
    say that they do for the purpose of simplification.

    Cetaceans in space? Douglas Adams had one (came to a bad end). Whatever for?
    Maybe that would depend somewhat on what a cetacean communicating
    with a computer and robot could do.

    Water still boils in a vacuum and the dolphins breathe air but it is not obvious whether a water matrix and pressure differences during diving
    in many ocean environments would make dolphins any more or less
    resistant than humans to emergency situations in space.

    The lighter cetaceans would not weigh any more than a human astronaut,
    but water tanks and apparatus dealing with water leaks could be an
    extra weight factor.

    Who knows. I could not find much however on attempts to get computers
    to do something like sound recognition and send info back with speakers
    in water or computer screens in water (in a pool on Earth) anyway.

    Humans lose bone mass in space, manatees & walruses have superdense bones. Vaquitas in the Gulf of Coronada are the smallest cet. but nearly extinct.
    Cet. have earwax-occluded auditory canals.
    Funny to imagine a whale in space using scuba...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to Trolidan7@eternal-september.org on Tue Jul 26 10:33:59 2022
    On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:32:47 -0700, Trolidan7
    <Trolidan7@eternal-september.org> wrote:

    On 7/25/22 8:49 AM, erik simpson wrote:
    On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 12:16:13 AM UTC-7, 69jp...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:05:12 -0700 (PDT), erik simpson
    <eastsi...@gmail.com> wrote:


    They can come quite a ways out of the water, jumping at least a couple meters up onto
    an ice shelf. They don't flap as they do so,and they can land on their feet, waddling.
    Not jumping, exactly, since the propulsion comes from wings/flippers. >>>>
    That has to be right, but it's spectacular. They pop out of the water at speed.
    Amazing are the feats inspired by being chased by a hungry leopard
    seal.

    Even I would try to get out of the water fast if I thought something like a leopard seal were around.

    You know looking up the article on the leopard seal it gave the
    idea that the seals do vocalization under water.

    The middle ear of mammals generally exists to amplify sound in
    air, but I get the idea that in mammals most underwater sound is
    picked up from the jaw and skull for most land mammals.

    A while ago I wondered about the possibility of computer interfaces
    to transmit and collect and interpret sounds from cetaceans.

    I also wondered about what cetacean would be most ideal to send into
    space.

    At that point I noticed that the bottlenose dolphin was different
    from the common dolphin, and there are smaller dolphins than the
    common dolphin. In the last surf I noticed that there were river
    dolphins in Asia as well as South America. It does not seem obvious
    to me what the smallest cetacean species is. There are several small
    ones that weigh as adults about 2/3rds the mass of an average adult
    human. I am thinking from some surfs that the smaller dolphins have
    an average brain mass of about 3/4ths that of an average adult human
    but humans vary in their brain volume from about 800cc to over 2500cc.

    To the best of my understanding, I am thinking their temporal lobes
    are relatively more developed since the temporal lobe is generally
    involved with the processing of sound.

    I do not know if dolphins or whales or seals have a middle ear, or
    what the capabilities of their vision is. Maybe all mammals do
    have a middle ear or only some do. Probably most textbooks would
    say that they do for the purpose of simplification.


    <https://dosits.org/animals/sound-reception/marine-mammals-hear/hearing-in-cetaceans/>

    So yes, all cetaceans have middle ears, and are highly adapted to
    hearing in water.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)