• Macroevolutionary history of squamates

    From Pandora@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 4 15:23:53 2022
    The Jurassic rise of squamates as supported by lepidosaur disparity
    and evolutionary rates

    Abstract

    The squamates (lizards, snakes, and relatives) today comprise more
    than 10,000 species, and yet their sister group, the Rhynchocephalia,
    is represented by a single species today, the tuatara. The explosion
    in squamate diversity has been tracked back to the Cretaceous
    Terrestrial Revolution, 100 million years ago (Ma), the time when
    flowering plants began their takeover of terrestrial ecosystems,
    associated with diversification of coevolving insects and
    insect-eating predators such as lizards, birds, and mammals. Squamates
    arose much earlier, but their long pre-Cretaceous history of some 150
    million years (Myr) is documented by sparse fossils. Here, we provide
    evidence for an initial radiation of squamate morphology in the Middle
    and Late Jurassic (174–145 Ma), and show that they established their
    key ecological roles much earlier than had been assumed, and they have
    not changed them much since.

    Open access:
    https://elifesciences.org/articles/66511

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Nyikos@21:1/5 to Pandora on Fri Jun 17 19:49:13 2022
    A glimpse into the past of sci.bio.paleontology, before turning to the matter at hand:
    Back in the 1990's, when s.b.p. was much more active than now, one of the regulars went by the moniker "Cal King". Did you and he overlap, Pandora?

    He was as interested in squamates as I already was in mammals back then, and he explained
    his interest in them by the huge variety of their morphology, which he considered
    to be greater than that of mammals.


    On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 9:23:54 AM UTC-4, Pandora wrote:
    The Jurassic rise of squamates as supported by lepidosaur disparity
    and evolutionary rates

    The word "disparity" caught my attention, because that was what Cal King was referring to in different words back then. It was only long after he left s.b.p.
    that I came to realize how much a deep understanding of disparity is essential to
    developing a theory of macroevolution, and thereby to a theory of evolution worthy of the name.

    As it is, the theory of evolution is still mostly a theory of microevolution, with a few forays in the direction of macroevolution and mega-evolution
    as described by George Gaylord Simpson.

    Our understanding of disparity is still in the formative stages,
    but the article represents a major effort in developing a true picture of disparity.

    The most remarkable thing about this article is the rare glimpse it
    gives the public of the editorial process, beginning with the decision
    letter and extensive reviewer remarks, followed by a very detailed
    author response. All these together take up almost as much space
    as the research article itself.

    I was pleased to see the following comment by reviewer #2:

    "The evolution of disparity, as distinct from species diversity, is a central question in macroevolution."

    I was also pleased to see the following:

    "Editor's evaluation
    This article presents an evaluation of the macroevolutionary history of squamates (lizards, snakes, and relatives) and is relevant to evolutionary biologists and paleontologists interested in this group. The ‘early burst’ of disparity in squamates
    demonstrates that squamates established their morphospace range much earlier than had been assumed, and the long-term stable morphospace occupation ever since."

    This evaluation forms an essential supplement to the actual abstract:

    Abstract
    The squamates (lizards, snakes, and relatives) today comprise more
    than 10,000 species, and yet their sister group, the Rhynchocephalia,
    is represented by a single species today, the tuatara.

    This is about diversity, which is often confused with disparity,
    partly under the influence of the word "biodiversity." Diversity is
    simply measured by the number of species in a group.


    The explosion
    in squamate diversity has been tracked back to the Cretaceous
    Terrestrial Revolution, 100 million years ago (Ma), the time when
    flowering plants began their takeover of terrestrial ecosystems,
    associated with diversification of coevolving insects and
    insect-eating predators such as lizards, birds, and mammals. Squamates
    arose much earlier, but their long pre-Cretaceous history of some 150 million years (Myr) is documented by sparse fossils. Here, we provide evidence for an initial radiation of squamate morphology in the Middle
    and Late Jurassic (174–145 Ma), and show that they established their
    key ecological roles much earlier than had been assumed, and they have
    not changed them much since.


    The expression used above, "initial radiation of squamate morphology,"
    hints at the idea of disparity: the radiation of characters in various directions,
    giving shape to a "morphospace" which is the subject of disparity analysis.

    Open access:
    https://elifesciences.org/articles/66511

    I am very glad you shared this with us, Pandora.
    I've spent all the time I can spare for it this week,
    but I will be studying it very carefully in the coming months, on and off.

    I was going to respond this week also to an earlier article you posted about
    on monotreme evolution, but I'll have to postpone that until next week.


    Peter Nyikos
    Professor, Department of Mathematics
    University of South Carolina -- standard disclaimer -- https://people.math.sc.edu/nyikos/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)