• anyone watching this netflix video on life?

    From Popping Mad@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 06:50:11 2023
    This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
    has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

    The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
    me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
    REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
    away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
    top and consistantly wrong in the details.

    And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
    clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
    is so lacking and so poorly done.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From erik simpson@21:1/5 to Popping Mad on Thu Nov 9 08:07:44 2023
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
    This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
    has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

    The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
    me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
    REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
    away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
    top and consistantly wrong in the details.

    And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
    is so lacking and so poorly done.
    I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
    PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
    almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
    part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
    show is released.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Popping Mad@21:1/5 to erik simpson on Fri Nov 10 01:12:47 2023
    On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
    This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
    has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

    The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
    me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
    REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
    away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
    top and consistantly wrong in the details.

    And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
    clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
    is so lacking and so poorly done.
    I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
    PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
    almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
    part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
    show is released.


    supposefly they hired a bunch of them


    https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sight Reader@21:1/5 to Popping Mad on Fri Nov 10 06:42:12 2023
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 11:12:38 PM UTC-7, Popping Mad wrote:
    On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
    This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it >> has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

    The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for >> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
    REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
    away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
    top and consistantly wrong in the details.

    And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
    clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
    is so lacking and so poorly done.
    I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
    part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the show is released.
    supposefly they hired a bunch of them


    https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/

    … then probably overrode their input, lol…

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sight Reader@21:1/5 to Sight Reader on Fri Nov 10 06:47:50 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 7:42:13 AM UTC-7, Sight Reader wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 11:12:38 PM UTC-7, Popping Mad wrote:
    On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
    This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
    has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

    The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for >> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
    REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position >> away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the >> top and consistantly wrong in the details.

    And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much >> clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work >> is so lacking and so poorly done.
    I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
    part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the show is released.
    supposefly they hired a bunch of them


    https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/
    … then probably overrode their input, lol…

    I did like Season 2 of Prehistoric Planet (Apple TV). Not only is the CGI far better, but they greatly toned down the overclaims and wild speculation from Season 1 and discovered it’s still possible to be dramatic simply sticking to things that are
    likely. I’m no expert but I still raised an eyebrow a few times every episode, but I still found it enjoyable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)