On 10/20/22 10:23 PM, David Dalton wrote:
Once again I am trying to instigate a sudden magickal physical
evolution, including of current adults, which will involve a
spilt of homo sapiens globally into 55 equal species with
a 200 year lifespan, but with women restricted to just two
children, so while there will be a gradual slow population
increase for a while, after a while it will start to slowly
decrease. The slow population growth is feasible since
the species split will allow better use of varied environments
here on Earth (and hopefully elsewhere eventually), plus
there should/will be a shift to more sustainable practices.
I will recount supposed progress in this thread on these
six scientific groups, since, in the unlikely event
that it is working, you may be able to confirm it
(by taking fresh cell samples, not relying on ones
taken a while ago). But for more background see recent
threads on alt.religion.druid and my now slightly out
of date Salmon on the Thorns web page.
The sudden magickal physical evolution calculations
(based on many ideas including some taken from
science fiction) began 0249 UTC October 18, 2022.
They were complete at 0147 UTC October 20, 2022,
when matter movement through higher dimensional
pathways began.
Progress:
(s1) mitochondrial DNA adjustment complete 0443 UTC Oct. 21
I am not sure, but I tend to get the idea that both the words
'magic' and 'medicine' derive from the word 'magi' or 'priests
of the near east' - not necessarily Zoroastrian because possibly
some of them might have been followers of 'Mithra' or 'Mani'.
Saying 'Priest of Persia' might be in error, because the Medes
were one province of the empire of Xerxes generally in the west
near what is now eastern Turkey, whereas Xerxes was from an
eastern province whereas Cyrus was from a western province.
Beyond that, I am thinking that the word 'Medea' (as in
Jason and Medea) might have also been a similar derivation
of the name for that eastern area of Turkey or northern
Assyria, just like "Adam' meaning singular or plural for
'man' in general. (The 'Achaemenid Empire' generally being
an empire of the 'Persians and the Medes'.)
Now I am pruning this to sci.bio.paleontology, but once
upon there was someone named Stephen Jay Gould who sometimes
known for with some species promoting the idea of 'punctuated
equilibrium', or that changes in a species may not necessarily
always be slow and gradual.
Now there is a basic question - 'what is a species'. I
am thinking that some animals called wolves, coyotes, and
jackals can cross and produce fertile offspring, and some
types of foxes are given various common names that may
not be phylogenetic, and that phenomenon extends to some
of the South American canids.
The basic question is this - is the concept of a 'missing link'
a 'myth' - at least for some species transitions?
Now if you start sorting fossils in boxes, this might be a
more boring myth than say, sailing through the 'clashing rocks'
of Istanbul to get somewhere in Georgia. But when all is said
and done, if you start sorting fossils in boxes - one set of
fossils with a certain set of traits are 'one species' with
a specific name - and another set of fossils with a second
set of traits are in another box - then maybe statistically
all of fossils in one box are there because of one name and
there fossils in the other box are there because of another
name. There are actually however - no 'gaps' and no 'missing
links'. The variation within the species and gradual changes
mean that for some species, 'missing links' have been found
and existent for some time - except for the fact that the
fossils have been put on one box versus another because of
sorting based upon naming.
Is the concept of 'no missing links have been found' a 'myth'?
If it is a 'myth' for some species transitions, for what ones
is the concept of 'no missing link' most 'mythical'?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)