• Paleolithic Wood

    From JTEM@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 12:17:19 2022
    No, the other kind of wood...

    So there are sources that claim Neanderthals had
    small willies:

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2005/10/22/158791/-

    : A human penis might have been too large for a
    : Neanderthal female.A Neanderthal penis might have
    : looked tiny to a human female (that is, if they could
    : stomach our females with those repulsive things on
    : their chests).

    It's an appallingly bad piece, written before interbreeding
    between Neanderthals and so called "Moderns" was
    confirmed -- but long after it was satisfactorily established
    (I did say it is appallingly bad) -- and amongst the ignorant
    mistakes it makes is this example, where it's saying that
    Neanderthals weren't human!

    But, it does reflect the penis idea rather accurately...

    And it's stupid.

    Well, the suggestion that a cold adapted population of
    humans might have less of their bodily all dangly, flopping
    in the wind so to speak, is not exactly earth shattering. But
    a Neanderthal woman's va-jay-jay had to fit a Neanderthal
    baby's head, and as far as we know that head was
    significantly larger than a so called modern baby's head.

    Larger than ours, much less an archaic "modern."

    But there is a really good argument to be made for
    Neanderthals having smaller willies. And not just the
    logic of a cold adapted population not wanting frost
    bite.

    Google: Penis Size and r/K Selection. Chances are
    you'll find something like this:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/120205543/Examination-of-Penis-Size-and-r-K-Selection

    The theory here, what is claimed to be found, is that
    penis size correlates to r/K selection, with Asians the
    smallest, Africans the largest and Europeans somewhere
    in between.

    This actually fits another model. Yes, I know, it sounds
    "Racist" but it's not...

    Africa was best suited to survive major climactic
    upheavals, such as supervolcanic eruptions -- volcanic
    winters -- and large meteorite strikes. Example:

    Toba!

    Toba was a MASSIVE eruption more than 70k years
    ago. I mean, off the charts big; this thing was beyond
    human comprehension in size!

    Krakatoa! Google the 1983 eruption. It was enormous.
    But if Yellowstone erupts tomorrow you can expect it
    to be about 50 times larger!

    Toba was about 2.5x larger than Yellowstone...

    So Toba was big, Big, BIG. It would have resulted in an
    almost instantaneous "Volcanic Winter," as all that smoke
    and ash filled the sky, plunging the earth into darkness.
    And it would have taken a VERY long time to clear. We're
    talking a thousand years at least, probably more before
    the planet recovered. But, here's the thing...

    The equator is the best place to be. The planet doesn't
    recover evenly. The northern hemisphere is where it's
    all going to gravitate towards so the southern hemisphere
    is going to clear first, and the equator is the the absolute
    best place to be.

    Also: The coast is best. Assuming there isn't a tsunami
    heading your way. The ocean is a giant battery, storing &
    releasing energy. The ocean moderates climate. It also
    distributes energy from the sun but that's a matter for a
    different thread...

    So along the equator is the best place to be, the equator
    goes through Africa hence Africa is the place to be!

    What of the long lost continent of Sundaland? It's also
    great, or would have been but it was Ground Zero for
    Toba as well as a major meteorite strike(s) in the vicinity
    of 800k years ago...

    Okay so Africa is the place to be. But unlike anything that
    modern "Woke" culture wants to impose on reality, Africa
    was always as diverse IF NOT MORE SO than Eurasia.

    It's not a single homogenous group.

    So it's not just a question of Africa winning but WHICH
    of the diverse populations win? And, quite frankly, a sexually
    selected group would have a big advantage. They could
    bounce back the quickest, fill the vacuum left but the great
    die-off & spread...

    So it's not about race, it's about survivability, and Africa was
    not just the best place but a sexually selected African group
    would have the largest advantage of all.

    Thus, Neanderthals very well could have had little willies.

    ::Discuss::



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/695170963650838529

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)