Kip Thorne: "If you move toward the [light] source, you see the wavelength shortened but you don't see the speed changed"
https://youtu.be/mvdlN4H4T54?t=296
Clearly, the motion of the observer CANNOT change the wavelength of the incoming light:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
"Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...] but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer."
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waveshtml/node41.html
"Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo. [...] The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The
increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time."
http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php
So the speed of light relative to the observer does change, in accordance with the formula (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength) and in violation of Einstein's relativity.
Here Einsteinians usually remain silent, but if they decide to advance an objection, it may be something like this:
"That the wavelength changes is not what Kip Thorne says. What he does say is that the moving observer SEES the wavelength shortened. Different observers at different speeds see different wavelengths."
So the wavelength is not shortened but the moving observer sees it shortened? And if he moves in the opposite direction he sees the wavelength stretched? And the observer sees both shortening and stretching in such a way as to keep the speed of light
gloriously constant? Einsteinian myths are immeasurably more idiotic than flat-earth myths.
See more here:
https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)