1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ASTRO.AMATEUR

  • The Heliocentric Theory is Unscientific

    From Gaia Plata@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 2 23:09:25 2021
    You are all brainwashed. The earth is not a spinning ball hurtling
    through a vaccuum in 4 different ratcheting directions at mach 90.

    The sun is not 93 million miles away. The inverse square law of light
    proves this beyond a "shadow" of a doubt. If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the inverse
    square law of light emission.

    So what is going on here? How have you been deceived into believing junk science?

    https://youtu.be/Y0M8kowaoLs

    This video proves that the earth is not a spinning globe. It shows you
    how deranged, anti-scientific, and superstitious the scientific and
    academic establishments are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Gaia Plata on Thu Dec 2 22:24:51 2021
    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:09:23 PM UTC-7, Gaia Plata wrote:
    If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the inverse
    square law of light emission.

    It is true that the inverse square law of light emission means that,
    93 million miles away, we only see a small fraction of the light of the
    Sun.

    But why does that mean that the Sun would be completely invisible?

    Couldn't the Sun just have been very bright to begin with?

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Thu Dec 2 23:02:13 2021
    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:24:53 PM UTC-8, Quadibloc wrote:
    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:09:23 PM UTC-7, Gaia Plata wrote:
    If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the inverse square law of light emission.
    It is true that the inverse square law of light emission means that,
    93 million miles away, we only see a small fraction of the light of the
    Sun.

    But why does that mean that the Sun would be completely invisible?

    Couldn't the Sun just have been very bright to begin with?

    John Savard

    Yes, well, if you would receive the full power of the Sun, Earth would crispy fry like Venus or Mercury!
    There are stars/suns from thousands of light years away, no problemo to see them, eh?
    Also, 1300 earth can fit into Jupiter, so even it's farder from the Sun, still the brightest planet from earth, because it's size.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From StarDust@21:1/5 to Gaia Plata on Thu Dec 2 23:02:43 2021
    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 9:09:23 PM UTC-8, Gaia Plata wrote:
    You are all brainwashed. The earth is not a spinning ball hurtling
    through a vaccuum in 4 different ratcheting directions at mach 90.

    The sun is not 93 million miles away. The inverse square law of light
    proves this beyond a "shadow" of a doubt. If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the inverse
    square law of light emission.

    So what is going on here? How have you been deceived into believing junk science?

    https://youtu.be/Y0M8kowaoLs

    This video proves that the earth is not a spinning globe. It shows you
    how deranged, anti-scientific, and superstitious the scientific and
    academic establishments are.

    Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!
    Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!
    Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Gaia Plata on Fri Dec 3 01:01:36 2021
    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:09:23 PM UTC-7, Gaia Plata wrote:
    You are all brainwashed. The earth is not a spinning ball hurtling
    through a vaccuum in 4 different ratcheting directions at mach 90.

    The sun is not 93 million miles away. The inverse square law of light
    proves this beyond a "shadow" of a doubt. If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the inverse
    square law of light emission.

    So what is going on here? How have you been deceived into believing junk science?

    https://youtu.be/Y0M8kowaoLs

    This video proves that the earth is not a spinning globe. It shows you
    how deranged, anti-scientific, and superstitious the scientific and
    academic establishments are.

    I see that this video is where the flat Earth advocate was a guest on
    someone else's channel.

    One of his own videos is:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b9j42tFl2M

    Apparently he seems to be claiming that photons... have mass, so that...
    oh, no, wait a moment, that would make magnetism and static electric
    attraction into limited-range forces with a Yukawa potential, but it wouldn't change the distance light itself can travel.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 3 01:17:56 2021
    Actually, if you go here

    https://archive.org/details/TomilinHowPeopleDiscoveredTheShapeOfTheEarthRaduga1984

    you will discover the most compelling proof possible that the Earth is flat.

    This is a book that claims the Earth is round...

    but it's *Communist propaganda*!

    (What is the logical fallacy that this satirical post illustrates?)

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Fri Dec 3 01:42:50 2021
    On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 2:01:38 AM UTC-7, Quadibloc wrote:

    I see that this video is where the flat Earth advocate was a guest on
    someone else's channel.

    One of his own videos is:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1b9j42tFl2M

    And another is

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECcPwsr1cQc

    which was somewhat hard to find, despite being featured on the page for
    his channel.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?fred__k._engels=C2=AE?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 3 06:23:18 2021
    WONDERFUL NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!
    Another Starlink launch made with 48 new satellites added: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGtnvlQoyaw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Fri Dec 3 09:14:38 2021
    Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote in news:12aced9c-3ce7-4127-893a-668dd8cafda1n@googlegroups.com:

    On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 10:09:23 PM UTC-7, Gaia Plata
    wrote:
    If the sun were 93 million
    miles away it would be completely invisible, according to the
    inverse square law of light emission.

    It is true that the inverse square law of light emission means
    that, 93 million miles away, we only see a small fraction of the
    light of the Sun.

    But why does that mean that the Sun would be completely
    invisible?

    Because with severe enough mental illness, oen cannot see what one
    wishes wasn't there.

    Couldn't the Sun just have been very bright to begin with?

    Unlike Dumbass.

    --
    Terry Austin

    Proof that Alan Baker is a liar and a fool, and even stupider than
    Lynn:
    https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration
    (May 2019 total for people arrested for entering the United States
    illegally is over 132,000 for just the southwest border.)

    Vacation photos from Iceland:
    https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gaia Plata@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 5 02:58:59 2021
    On 12/3/21 8:23 AM, fred k. engels® wrote:
    WONDERFUL NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!
    Another Starlink launch made with 48 new satellites added: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGtnvlQoyaw


    nice cartoon! lots of nice cartoons! science!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)