Briefly, the Moon acts like a car travelling around a traffic
roundabout where the same side always faces the centre as a
property of its orbital motion. Call it revolution.
Also, if you were to be living on the far side of
the moon you would never see the Earth, but you
*would* see the Sun rise and set about every 29.53
days, which is a pretty good indication that it is
indeed rotating on its axis.
Your last post to Google Groups is just as ignorant as was your first.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:35:24 +0000, palsing wrote:
Also, if you were to be living on the far side of
the moon you would never see the Earth, but you
*would* see the Sun rise and set about every 29.53
days, which is a pretty good indication that it is
indeed rotating on its axis.
That's true, but he already _knows_ that this does
happen. He doesn't view that as "proving" that the
Moon rotates, because he doesn't _define_ rotation
that way; in order for the Moon to rotate as he
defines it, he would have to see the *Earth* rise
and set.
That's why I had to get into the much more complicated
argument that refers to libration - to show why his
definition of rotation, while superficially attractive,
is not the only reasonable one, and astronomers have
a very good reason to use, in the case of the Moon
at least, the different definition that they do in
fact use.
John Savard
I'd stick with simple. If the Moon doesn't rotate, why does a Focault pendulum work there? Why does an accelerometer sitting at a pole
produce a signal consistent with a one month rotation period?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 21:18:46 -0700, Chris L Peterson wrote:
I'd stick with simple. If the Moon doesn't rotate, why does a Focault
pendulum work there? Why does an accelerometer sitting at a pole
produce a signal consistent with a one month rotation period?
The problem is that sticking with simple doesn't really address his >argument...
Though you were gone with your "farewell" post on the 20th. Looked
forward to the door NOT hitting your backside upon your fast exit, but >unfortunately you are still here and posting your irrelevant fecal
matter. What gives?
Though you were gone with your "farewell" post on the 20th. Looked
forward to the door NOT hitting your backside upon your fast exit, but >unfortunately you are still here and posting your irrelevant fecal
matter. What gives?
No, the problem is that he's living in a bizarre dogmatic bubble such
that NO argument will ever allow him to recognize something so simple
that 2nd graders understand it after a simple classroom activity where
one person plays the Earth and another the Moon.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 298 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 07:53:23 |
Calls: | 6,671 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,219 |
Messages: | 5,339,190 |