The upcoming event is Glascow, Scotland represents the efforts of 'climate change modellers' over the last number of decades rather than any issue of climate itself. It draws in a lot of people on issues such as alternative energy supplies, financial
instruments (carbon trading), pollution and waste controls and so on.

For the speculative theorists, arguing against climate change is just as acceptable as arguing for the notion even though humanity cannot control the weather/temperature by doing or not doing something. The issue exists on another level based on the
validity of empirical modelling itself or the 'scientific method' as it is known. Anyone who shows the least interest by inspecting this subculture will be met with aggression, although it is the unrestricted modelling which is the source of the problem,
no more or no less.

What puts 'climate change modelling' in the same category as the 'universal theory of gravity' is the inability to link cause and effect through the Earth's motions. To all intents and purposes, modellers create computer simulations without reference
to the motions of the planet and thereby squander a proper use of computer modelling which can use planetary comparisons to present humanity with a productive and creative narrative of climate-

https://calgary.rasc.ca/images/planet_inclinations.gif

Planetary climate is determined as the rate of change in atmospheric and surface conditions across latitudes and that is dependent on the relationship of rotational inclination to the orbital plane (blue line).

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)