• [01] The Monkey Business of Evolution : Frederick Douglass was no Monke

    From NightBulb@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Wed Mar 8 01:38:06 2023
    On 3/6/23 19:42, Quadibloc wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 12:38:31 PM UTC-7, Gerald Kelleher quoted:
    " Away, therefore, with all the scientific moonshine that would
    connect men with monkeys; that would have the world believe
    that humanity, instead of resting on its own characteristic
    pedestal — gloriously independent — is a sort of sliding scale,
    making one extreme brother to the ourangou-tang, and the other
    to angels, and all the rest intermediates!" Frederick Douglass

    The theory of evolution is a hybrid religious and political dogma much
    older than Charles Darwin. Frederick Douglass was a _wise_ man who
    called it what it is: 'scientific moonshine.'

    "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane
    and vain babblings, and oppositions of _science_ falsely so called:
    Which some professing have erred concerning the faith." [1 Timothy 6:20-21]

    When this scripture was penned, a hybrid pagan cult termed their occult knowledge, 'science' or 'gnosis' in the Koine Greek. These were the
    'gnostics' and 'kabbalists' of the Greco-Roman pagan cults. They had
    been in the process of creating a syncretic blend of the religions of
    the Brahmans, the Mazdeans, the Mithrasts, the Tengrists, the Ra
    Disciples, and other cults, to solidify them under one cult authority
    subject to the Roman emperor, Caesar, as the chief representative of
    deity on earth. Each ruler of each nation was to be worshiped as divine,
    with Caesar as the chief deity, or "apotheosis" over the other "divine"
    kings. This is the tyranny of ancient politics and religion. And it is
    also the same tyranny of modern politics and religion, much more
    cleverly disguised in our day.

    This cult immediately sent its disinformation agents to infiltrate the congregations that the Apostles of Jesus established. Their spies would
    come in seeking to pervert the faith with 'science' or 'knowledge' which
    were the 'mysteries' of their syncretic religion. The occult discipled
    and trained spies who would infiltrate and capture organizations to
    bring them into their control, and hence under the control of Caesar by
    proxy. Such espionage is not new. It has been standard operating
    procedure of tyrants for thousands of years.

    The occult set about infiltrating the congregations of Jesus in the
    first century, to plant their occult kabbala and Greek philosophy, which
    would steer an organization toward accepting the authority of the state
    as supreme expression of authority, through, 'science.' The state would
    not tolerate any competition for its claim to represent deity and divine authority on earth. Whereas the Christians believed that the government
    is the servant of man instituted by the power of man, the evolutionists
    believe the government is the master and decider of ultimate truth and
    power instituted by the deity.

    This was the model of Plato's rebublic, in which the state is the
    ultimate and highest good. Paul the Apostle called this, "worshipping
    the creation more than the creator." Any person of moderate intelligence
    can see that the state is a deep well of violence and corruption, that
    always models itself as the great savior that will keep us all safe from violence and corruption. In pursuit of this delusional and psychotic
    aim, the mystery religion cult set to infiltrating the new faith of
    Jesus Christ to bring it into the syncretic fold of Caesar.

    "And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in
    privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they
    might bring us into bondage ..." [Galatians 2:4]

    This is the same cult of 'science' that has been passed down to this
    day, by the Roman Catholic Jesuit school, that by 'science' still
    demands the ritual genital mutilation of infant boys, euphemistically
    termed, 'circumcision.' They provide several totally fabricated and
    false reasons that circumcision is medically necessary for health
    reasons. And it's a lie. What they are doing is inducting all male
    infants into their religious cult under false medical pretense. They
    ensured by fiat and in some places by law, that all male infants undergo
    their religious induction ritual of cutting the flesh.

    It is the same occult religion peddled out of places like CERN and the
    Royal Society. They are trained liars. They lie about all their reasons
    for demanding belief in their religious tenets. The chief lies they
    provide are 'scientific' or 'medical' explanations for their rituals and dogmas. One tenet of their religion is to intentionally lie about the
    meaning of their rituals and symbols to those who are 'profane' outsiders.

    The goal is to induct you into their cult religion as a mental slave.
    They achieve this by hook or by crook, cooking up whatever 'scientific'
    or 'religious' lie fits the moment and induces the target to submit to
    their demands. Frederick Douglass sensed this, and wanted nothing to do
    with their evolutionary monkey business.

    Men like Frederick Douglass would lead people to moral and intellectual freedom. To counter this the occult liars constructed a thirteen-year
    primary education system and University degree system based on the pagan
    Roman system of degrees. This system of 'education' ensures that
    children are brainwashed in the occult religion, called by the
    euphemism, 'science.' The cult indoctrinates the children to defend
    their own enslavement as, 'science.' This 'science' system is every
    Caesar's dream system of conquest by doctrine. It has worked for many
    centuries to ensure Roman authority by doctrinal proxy over the nations, without ever admitting that Rome is the power behind all the religion
    and science, through its Jesuit brainwashing and propaganda machine.

    Frederick Douglass was a great and courageous man. However,
    he lived a long time ago, when people did not know as much about
    science as they do now.

    Frederick Douglass was orders of magnitude more intelligent than any evolutionist. By calling their dogma, 'moonshine' he showed his
    understanding that the pushers of evolution were seeking to make the
    people 'drunk' on lies.

    Evolutionists are the product of a mental slavery education system run
    by the occult. They are literally, 'drunk on the wine of the wrath of
    Rome's fornication.' Douglass was the product of struggle for freedom. Evolutionists are the product of struggle for enslavement.

    Seeing a occult evolutionist elevate himself intellectually above men
    like like Frederick Douglass is a putrid sight. Frederick Douglass was a freedom fighter. He had wisdom. The evolutionist is a slaver of the
    human mind. He has no wisdom, but the false wisdom of the occult. Using
    the religion of evolution to elevate yourself above men of Douglas' day
    is offensive arrogance and hubris. It is revolting.

    Now we know that the theory of evolution by natural selection, as
    proposed by Charles Darwin, is established fact, as far beyond
    challenge as the sphericity of the Earth or the Copernican theory.

    Challenge accepted.

    Nowhere at any time has the theory of evolution been established as
    fact. You are preaching a religious belief and calling your dogma a
    science, as you have been trained to do by the Roman system of occult
    degrees of knowledge. Moreover, the Copernican theory was just a
    re-imagining of the Ptolemaic and Platonic cosmologies made more
    palpable for the mass of rubes. There truly is nothing new under the sun.

    Evolutionists believe that Charles Darwin 'discovered' evolution through observations of the natural world and experiments. Yet this is a lie and
    never happened. The theory of evolution is much older than Charles
    Darwin. We shall examine its true origins.

    Charles Darwin did not invent the theory of evolution. His grandfather,
    Erasmus Darwin, wrote about it extensively in his religious poetry and
    his book, 'Zoonomia', before Charles Darwin was born. Charles Darwin
    later read the book and used it as the foundation for his 'Origin of
    Species.' The science cult community has avoided this fact for a
    century, instead promoting their false myth that Darwin arrived at these conclusions from natural observations. He arrived at his interpretation
    of natural observations based on the religion that his grandfather
    taught. The reverse of what evolutionists claim is what Darwin actually
    did. The theory of evolution is a bag of apriori religious babblings and
    grand eisegesis dressed up in jargon.

    "Would it be too bold to imagine, that in the great length of time since
    the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the
    commencement of the history of mankind, would it be too bold to imagine,
    that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament,
    which the first great cause endued with animality, with the power of
    acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by
    irritations, sensations, volitions, and associations; and thus
    possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent
    activity, and of delivering down those improvements by generation to its posterity, world without end!" [Zoonomia, Volume 2, page 240]

    Erasmus Darwin shows here all the tenets of evolution, the first great
    cause, natural selection, gradual species transformation, and so forth.
    He wrote about these ideas before his grandson Charles was born.

    Here is the religion of Erasmus Darwin, in his own words:

    Ere Time began, from flaming Chaos hurl’d
    Rose the bright spheres, which form the circling world
    Nurs’d by warm sun-beams in primeval caves,
    Organic Life began beneath the waves.

    Hence without parent by spontaneous birth
    Rise the first specks of animated earth;
    From Nature’s womb the plant or insect swims,
    And buds or breathes, with microscopic limbs.

    New powers acquire, and larger limbs assume;
    Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
    And breathing realms of fin, and feet, and wing.

    [Temple of Nature, by Erasmus Darwin]

    This nonsense is mother-earth or earth-goddess worship of the pagans.
    Erasmus Darwin and his spawn, Charles Darwin, were pagans. And they
    dressed up their pagan religion, or 'gnosis' as 'science.' Like many
    pagans, raised as occult pagans from birth, Charles Darwin pretended to
    be a Christian, and even studied Christian theology. And then he went on
    to pervert and destroy the Christian faith like all syncretist occult infiltrators have always done. He tried to use 'science' to force his
    occult religion into Christian social acceptance--to convert the
    Christians. Recall that earlier in this missive how the pagans were
    doing the same thing in the days of the apostles. There is nothing new
    under the sun.

    Evolution is from the religious belief of Erasmus Darwin, based upon his
    cult's Brahman cosmology. All the Spinozan cults, such as Freemasonry,
    Kabbala, and Deism, Mazdaism, Tengrism, and Mithraism shared their ideas
    from the gnostic pagans, who borrowed from the Brahmans, and these cults recycled each other's ideas back and forth and shared them in such
    fashion for centuries. You will find all the religious dogmas of modern scientism originating with the ancient Brahmans:

    - big bang theory (brahman kalpas)
    - evolution (brahman kalpas)
    - life originating in the sea (brahman kalpas, dagon idolatry)
    - survival of the fittest (child rape and sacrifice in temples)
    - transhumanism (god-man of the Romans)
    - transgenderism (baphomet of the Freemasons)
    - man as a mere economic unit (Moloch worship)
    - the state as god (Roman and Greek Temple of Democracy)

    And make no mistake about it, these ancient cults practiced ritual human sacrifice and child rape as sacraments of their religions. There are
    many historical records of these practices and many archaelogical sites
    of the bodies of the victims. Today we witness them trying to codify
    these savage and primitive religious ideas into law, as "human rights"
    such as:

    - abortion
    - gender fluidity
    - women's rights
    - equity

    All of these doctrines are foundational to human sacrifice. None of
    these doctrines achieves what they claim to achieve on the surface. They
    all have one goal: emasculation of men, so that the state can legitimize horrors that strong men would oppose by force.

    Seeing that Darwinism is a religion of this foul lineage, evolution has
    no scientific foundation whatsoever and is purely an ancient religious
    belief of the child sacrifice cults of the pagans. This ancient
    religious belief of evolution is a monstrous lie. It is a religion.

    Erasmus Darwin's coat of arms, circa 1771, shows his religious evolution
    dogma:

    https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Family-coats-of-arms-used-by-Erasmus-Darwin-as-a-bookplate-similar-to-the-coat-of-arms_fig3_225581471

    The motto on this coat of arms is, 'e conchis omnia' and it translates, "Everything comes from the sea shells." This is the religious motto of
    the ancient dogma of all life evolving from the sea. The common
    perception that Charles Darwin spawned evolution from naturalistic
    exploration is a patent farce. His ancestors before him already held
    this belief from their religion. So fervent was their belief in this
    religion of evolution that Erasmus Darwin put it on his coat of arms.
    Charles Darwin's 'scientific' endeavors weren't even a thought yet.

    This is historical fact and irrefutable part of the historical record,
    unlike John Savard's religiosity toward 'unchallengeable' evolution. Of
    course the grandson of Erasmus Darwin, Charles, was inducted into the
    same Brahmist religious cult, as are most of the modern cosmologists and astrophysicists. The CERN headquarters has a statue of the Brahman god
    by the doors. Why don't they have a statue of Jesus? Because they
    worship the pagan deities is why. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to
    put two and two together and figure out what they are doing. They are converting people to their anti-christ religion under the guise of
    'science.'

    Erasmus Darwin hated the Christian faith, because he was a Brahmist / Mithraist. He viciously slandered Christian piety. His evolution
    nonsense was an attempt to put the mantle of science on his Brahman
    religion. The theory of evolution was cooked up in a religious war
    against the faith of Jesus. That's all it was then. That's all it is now.

    And, of course, it's your _bete noire_, Isaac Newton, who made
    the Copernican theory unchallengeable, instead of one opinion
    among many.

    It is always a religion when someone claims their unproven and
    unfalsifiable belief is 'unchallengeable.'

    Challenge accepted.

    Mr. Savard's opinions are a common religious reverie from brainwashed
    rubes who never had to struggle for liberty like Frederick Douglass and
    his people had to do. Mr. Savard's only struggle is making sure he
    expresses the acceptable opinions approved by his science priesthood.
    Mr. Savard is struggling to be a slave and show his masters his
    devotion. Unlike Frederick Douglass who was acquainted with a life of
    struggle against those in power, Mr. Savard has lived a life subjecting
    himself to those in power, and has 'scientismic stockholm syndrome', or
    SSS. He is a card-carrying member of the SSS.

    If the theory of evolution indeed implied that the races were unequal
    in intelligence, there would be a problem. But it does not. Neither, unfortunately, does it say that they must be equal. It is instead from observation that we can conclude that there are no significant
    differences in intelligence between the races - to the extent that the
    supposed races of mankind even really exist.

    Mr. Savard is failing to distinguish between a conjecture, a hypothesis,
    a theory, and a empirical fact. The scientism cult does this often.
    Every race in the world believes its own race exists. It takes a great
    mental gymnast to counter something so obvious. Yet this is what the
    religion of scientism daily requires of its disciples. Race does not
    exist, except when politics demands punishing a particular race.

    I would suggest to you that you read _The Mismeasure of Man_ by Stephen
    Jay Gould - in which a noted expert on evolution both recounts the sad history, of which you appear aware, of attempts to misuse evolution
    to argue for racial differences and also defends the truth of what we
    really learn from evolution on this issue.

    Sure, I'll jump right on it and read more blather from someone educated
    by those in power. Rather, instead of reading the vomit of Stephen Jay
    Gould, you should research Erasmus Darwin and the ancient religious
    origin of his evolutionary model. It originates with the Brahmans, who practiced their religion of evolutionary Aryan supremacy. And unlike
    your evolution theory, this is an actual fact that the theory of
    evolution goes back thousands of years to a racial supremacist, human
    sacrifice cult. A real thinker like Frederick Douglass was able to sniff
    this out as nonsense. Douglass rightly opined what evolution really is:
    a racial supremacist cult that equates Pharaoah's kids as divine Aryans
    and everyone else as inferior racial castes under Pharaoh's superior
    blood power.

    Rather than read more evolutionist swill I will heed the inspired
    counsel of men much better than the apostate, false Christian, Darwin:

    "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane
    and vain babblings, and oppositions of _science_ falsely so called:
    Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with
    thee. Amen." [1 Timothy 6:20-21]

    The Apostles were divinely inspired and knew all about 'science' and its crackpot theories taken from pagan sources. They warned us about it
    almost 2000 years ago.

    Paul the Apostle warned us about this ancient evolutionary human
    sacrifice cult and its satanic ways:

    "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the
    glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible
    man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore
    God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own
    hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed
    the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more
    than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." [Romans 1:22-25]

    This John Savard perches upon. The theory of evolution is a RELIGION. It
    is a religion cooked up thousands of years ago by a racial supremacist
    cult that raped and killed and immolated children as part of its temple rituals. It has always been a religion from antiquity. Dressing it up as "science" is a satanic lie.

    Jesus taught to judge a tree by its fruit. The fruit tells us about the
    root, whether it is good or evil. A good tree brings forth good fruit. A corrupt tree brings forth evil fruit. Evolution is a very evil tree and
    its fruit is death. Jesus Christ is the good tree and his fruit is life.

    I have challenged Savard's "unchallengeable" evolution and I have deftly destroyed it. I have exposed it as an ancient dogma of a child sacrifice
    rape cult with a racial supremacist core. John Savard should change his
    mind while you still can. Jesus Christ is Lord. And He is
    unchallengeable! His Father, God, the only God, created all the races of
    men for his own good will and pleasure. No amount of rebellious,
    Spinozan, Jesuit-inspired, Deist, big-bang gobbledy-gook can change it.

    The religion of scientism achieves the same goals as the oppressive
    cults of the ancient world--to proclaim the state as divine king, and to worship the person of the state as the Roman Caesar instead of the true
    Creator God, Jehovah Elohim.

    This is exemplified by the Pharisees who under the influence of Roman
    religion and politics, proclaimed, "We have no king but Caesar!" Yet the
    Torah that they pretended to believe in teaches that Jehovah and his Son
    are the only rightful Kingship over Israel.

    The cult of evolution is a Trojan horse crafted to make Christians
    proclaim, "We have no king but Caesar!" Evolution is a ideological proxy
    for the power of Rome to occupy the minds of nations. The dogma of
    evolution brings the Pope into the governor's office by the back door.

    John Savard

    --
    NightBulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

    How to get ahead in life:
    Judaism: circumcision. Christianism: lobotomy. Evolution: brainwash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb.net@21:1/5 to Quadibloc on Wed Mar 8 01:33:20 2023
    On 3/6/23 19:42, Quadibloc wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 12:38:31 PM UTC-7, Gerald Kelleher quoted:
    " Away, therefore, with all the scientific moonshine that would
    connect men with monkeys; that would have the world believe
    that humanity, instead of resting on its own characteristic
    pedestal — gloriously independent — is a sort of sliding scale,
    making one extreme brother to the ourangou-tang, and the other
    to angels, and all the rest intermediates!" Frederick Douglass

    The theory of evolution is a hybrid religious and political dogma much
    older than Charles Darwin. Frederick Douglass was a _wise_ man who
    called it what it is: 'scientific moonshine.'

    "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane
    and vain babblings, and oppositions of _science_ falsely so called:
    Which some professing have erred concerning the faith." [1 Timothy 6:20-21]

    When this scripture was penned, a hybrid pagan cult termed their occult knowledge, 'science' or 'gnosis' in the Koine Greek. These were the
    'gnostics' and 'kabbalists' of the Greco-Roman pagan cults. They had
    been in the process of creating a syncretic blend of the religions of
    the Brahmans, the Mazdeans, the Mithrasts, the Tengrists, the Ra
    Disciples, and other cults, to solidify them under one cult authority
    subject to the Roman emperor, Caesar, as the chief representative of
    deity on earth. Each ruler of each nation was to be worshiped as divine,
    with Caesar as the chief deity, or "apotheosis" over the other "divine"
    kings. This is the tyranny of ancient politics and religion. And it is
    also the same tyranny of modern politics and religion, much more
    cleverly disguised in our day.

    This cult immediately sent its disinformation agents to infiltrate the congregations that the Apostles of Jesus established. Their spies would
    come in seeking to pervert the faith with 'science' or 'knowledge' which
    were the 'mysteries' of their syncretic religion. The occult discipled
    and trained spies who would infiltrate and capture organizations to
    bring them into their control, and hence under the control of Caesar by
    proxy. Such espionage is not new. It has been standard operating
    procedure of tyrants for thousands of years.

    The occult set about infiltrating the congregations of Jesus in the
    first century, to plant their occult kabbala and Greek philosophy, which
    would steer an organization toward accepting the authority of the state
    as supreme expression of authority, through, 'science.' The state would
    not tolerate any competition for its claim to represent deity and divine authority on earth. Whereas the Christians believed that the government
    is the servant of man instituted by the power of man, the evolutionists
    believe the government is the master and decider of ultimate truth and
    power instituted by the deity.

    This was the model of Plato's rebublic, in which the state is the
    ultimate and highest good. Paul the Apostle called this, "worshipping
    the creation more than the creator." Any person of moderate intelligence
    can see that the state is a deep well of violence and corruption, that
    always models itself as the great savior that will keep us all safe from violence and corruption. In pursuit of this delusional and psychotic
    aim, the mystery religion cult set to infiltrating the new faith of
    Jesus Christ to bring it into the syncretic fold of Caesar.

    "And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in
    privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they
    might bring us into bondage ..." [Galatians 2:4]

    This is the same cult of 'science' that has been passed down to this
    day, by the Roman Catholic Jesuit school, that by 'science' still
    demands the ritual genital mutilation of infant boys, euphemistically
    termed, 'circumcision.' They provide several totally fabricated and
    false reasons that circumcision is medically necessary for health
    reasons. And it's a lie. What they are doing is inducting all male
    infants into their religious cult under false medical pretense. They
    ensured by fiat and in some places by law, that all male infants undergo
    their religious induction ritual of cutting the flesh.

    It is the same occult religion peddled out of places like CERN and the
    Royal Society. They are trained liars. They lie about all their reasons
    for demanding belief in their religious tenets. The chief lies they
    provide are 'scientific' or 'medical' explanations for their rituals and dogmas. One tenet of their religion is to intentionally lie about the
    meaning of their rituals and symbols to those who are 'profane' outsiders.

    The goal is to induct you into their cult religion as a mental slave.
    They achieve this by hook or by crook, cooking up whatever 'scientific'
    or 'religious' lie fits the moment and induces the target to submit to
    their demands. Frederick Douglass sensed this, and wanted nothing to do
    with their evolutionary monkey business.

    Men like Frederick Douglass would lead people to moral and intellectual freedom. To counter this the occult liars constructed a thirteen-year
    primary education system and University degree system based on the pagan
    Roman system of degrees. This system of 'education' ensures that
    children are brainwashed in the occult religion, called by the
    euphemism, 'science.' The cult indoctrinates the children to defend
    their own enslavement as, 'science.' This 'science' system is every
    Caesar's dream system of conquest by doctrine. It has worked for many
    centuries to ensure Roman authority by doctrinal proxy over the nations, without ever admitting that Rome is the power behind all the religion
    and science, through its Jesuit brainwashing and propaganda machine.

    Frederick Douglass was a great and courageous man. However,
    he lived a long time ago, when people did not know as much about
    science as they do now.

    Frederick Douglass was orders of magnitude more intelligent than any evolutionist. By calling their dogma, 'moonshine' he showed his
    understanding that the pushers of evolution were seeking to make the
    people 'drunk' on lies.

    Evolutionists are the product of a mental slavery education system run
    by the occult. They are literally, 'drunk on the wine of the wrath of
    Rome's fornication.' Douglass was the product of struggle for freedom. Evolutionists are the product of struggle for enslavement.

    Seeing a occult evolutionist elevate himself intellectually above men
    like like Frederick Douglass is a putrid sight. Frederick Douglass was a freedom fighter. He had wisdom. The evolutionist is a slaver of the
    human mind. He has no wisdom, but the false wisdom of the occult. Using
    the religion of evolution to elevate yourself above men of Douglas' day
    is offensive arrogance and hubris. It is revolting.

    Now we know that the theory of evolution by natural selection, as
    proposed by Charles Darwin, is established fact, as far beyond
    challenge as the sphericity of the Earth or the Copernican theory.

    Challenge accepted.

    Nowhere at any time has the theory of evolution been established as
    fact. You are preaching a religious belief and calling your dogma a
    science, as you have been trained to do by the Roman system of occult
    degrees of knowledge. Moreover, the Copernican theory was just a
    re-imagining of the Ptolemaic and Platonic cosmologies made more
    palpable for the mass of rubes. There truly is nothing new under the sun.

    Evolutionists believe that Charles Darwin 'discovered' evolution through observations of the natural world and experiments. Yet this is a lie and
    never happened. The theory of evolution is much older than Charles
    Darwin. We shall examine its true origins.

    Charles Darwin did not invent the theory of evolution. His grandfather,
    Erasmus Darwin, wrote about it extensively in his religious poetry and
    his book, 'Zoonomia', before Charles Darwin was born. Charles Darwin
    later read the book and used it as the foundation for his 'Origin of
    Species.' The science cult community has avoided this fact for a
    century, instead promoting their false myth that Darwin arrived at these conclusions from natural observations. He arrived at his interpretation
    of natural observations based on the religion that his grandfather
    taught. The reverse of what evolutionists claim is what Darwin actually
    did. The theory of evolution is a bag of apriori religious babblings and
    grand eisegesis dressed up in jargon.

    "Would it be too bold to imagine, that in the great length of time since
    the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the
    commencement of the history of mankind, would it be too bold to imagine,
    that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament,
    which the first great cause endued with animality, with the power of
    acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by
    irritations, sensations, volitions, and associations; and thus
    possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent
    activity, and of delivering down those improvements by generation to its posterity, world without end!" [Zoonomia, Volume 2, page 240]

    Erasmus Darwin shows here all the tenets of evolution, the first great
    cause, natural selection, gradual species transformation, and so forth.
    He wrote about these ideas before his grandson Charles was born.

    Here is the religion of Erasmus Darwin, in his own words:

    Ere Time began, from flaming Chaos hurl’d
    Rose the bright spheres, which form the circling world
    Nurs’d by warm sun-beams in primeval caves,
    Organic Life began beneath the waves.

    Hence without parent by spontaneous birth
    Rise the first specks of animated earth;
    From Nature’s womb the plant or insect swims,
    And buds or breathes, with microscopic limbs.

    New powers acquire, and larger limbs assume;
    Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
    And breathing realms of fin, and feet, and wing.

    [Temple of Nature, by Erasmus Darwin]

    This nonsense is mother-earth or earth-goddess worship of the pagans.
    Erasmus Darwin and his spawn, Charles Darwin, were pagans. And they
    dressed up their pagan religion, or 'gnosis' as 'science.' Like many
    pagans, raised as occult pagans from birth, Charles Darwin pretended to
    be a Christian, and even studied Christian theology. And then he went on
    to pervert and destroy the Christian faith like all syncretist occult infiltrators have always done. He tried to use 'science' to force his
    occult religion into Christian social acceptance--to convert the
    Christians. Recall that earlier in this missive how the pagans were
    doing the same thing in the days of the apostles. There is nothing new
    under the sun.

    Evolution is from the religious belief of Erasmus Darwin, based upon his
    cult's Brahman cosmology. All the Spinozan cults, such as Freemasonry,
    Kabbala, and Deism, Mazdaism, Tengrism, and Mithraism shared their ideas
    from the gnostic pagans, who borrowed from the Brahmans, and these cults recycled each other's ideas back and forth and shared them in such
    fashion for centuries. You will find all the religious dogmas of modern scientism originating with the ancient Brahmans:

    - big bang theory (brahman kalpas)
    - evolution (brahman kalpas)
    - life originating in the sea (brahman kalpas, dagon idolatry)
    - survival of the fittest (child rape and sacrifice in temples)
    - transhumanism (god-man of the Romans)
    - transgenderism (baphomet of the Freemasons)
    - man as a mere economic unit (Moloch worship)
    - the state as god (Roman and Greek Temple of Democracy)

    And make no mistake about it, these ancient cults practiced ritual human sacrifice and child rape as sacraments of their religions. There are
    many historical records of these practices and many archaelogical sites
    of the bodies of the victims. Today we witness them trying to codify
    these savage and primitive religious ideas into law, as "human rights"
    such as:

    - abortion
    - gender fluidity
    - women's rights
    - equity

    All of these doctrines are foundational to human sacrifice. None of
    these doctrines achieves what they claim to achieve on the surface. They
    all have one goal: emasculation of men, so that the state can legitimize horrors that strong men would oppose by force.

    Seeing that Darwinism is a religion of this foul lineage, evolution has
    no scientific foundation whatsoever and is purely an ancient religious
    belief of the child sacrifice cults of the pagans. This ancient
    religious belief of evolution is a monstrous lie. It is a religion.

    Erasmus Darwin's coat of arms, circa 1771, shows his religious evolution
    dogma:

    https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Family-coats-of-arms-used-by-Erasmus-Darwin-as-a-bookplate-similar-to-the-coat-of-arms_fig3_225581471

    The motto on this coat of arms is, 'e conchis omnia' and it translates, "Everything comes from the sea shells." This is the religious motto of
    the ancient dogma of all life evolving from the sea. The common
    perception that Charles Darwin spawned evolution from naturalistic
    exploration is a patent farce. His ancestors before him already held
    this belief from their religion. So fervent was their belief in this
    religion of evolution that Erasmus Darwin put it on his coat of arms.
    Charles Darwin's 'scientific' endeavors weren't even a thought yet.

    This is historical fact and irrefutable part of the historical record,
    unlike John Savard's religiosity toward 'unchallengeable' evolution. Of
    course the grandson of Erasmus Darwin, Charles, was inducted into the
    same Brahmist religious cult, as are most of the modern cosmologists and astrophysicists. The CERN headquarters has a statue of the Brahman god
    by the doors. Why don't they have a statue of Jesus? Because they
    worship the pagan deities is why. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to
    put two and two together and figure out what they are doing. They are converting people to their anti-christ religion under the guise of
    'science.'

    Erasmus Darwin hated the Christian faith, because he was a Brahmist / Mithraist. He viciously slandered Christian piety. His evolution
    nonsense was an attempt to put the mantle of science on his Brahman
    religion. The theory of evolution was cooked up in a religious war
    against the faith of Jesus. That's all it was then. That's all it is now.

    And, of course, it's your _bete noire_, Isaac Newton, who made
    the Copernican theory unchallengeable, instead of one opinion
    among many.

    It is always a religion when someone claims their unproven and
    unfalsifiable belief is 'unchallengeable.'

    Challenge accepted.

    Mr. Savard's opinions are a common religious reverie from brainwashed
    rubes who never had to struggle for liberty like Frederick Douglass and
    his people had to do. Mr. Savard's only struggle is making sure he
    expresses the acceptable opinions approved by his science priesthood.
    Mr. Savard is struggling to be a slave and show his masters his
    devotion. Unlike Frederick Douglass who was acquainted with a life of
    struggle against those in power, Mr. Savard has lived a life subjecting
    himself to those in power, and has 'scientismic stockholm syndrome', or
    SSS. He is a card-carrying member of the SSS.

    If the theory of evolution indeed implied that the races were unequal
    in intelligence, there would be a problem. But it does not. Neither, unfortunately, does it say that they must be equal. It is instead from observation that we can conclude that there are no significant
    differences in intelligence between the races - to the extent that the supposed races of mankind even really exist.

    Mr. Savard is failing to distinguish between a conjecture, a hypothesis,
    a theory, and a empirical fact. The scientism cult does this often.
    Every race in the world believes its own race exists. It takes a great
    mental gymnast to counter something so obvious. Yet this is what the
    religion of scientism daily requires of its disciples. Race does not
    exist, except when politics demands punishing a particular race.

    I would suggest to you that you read _The Mismeasure of Man_ by Stephen
    Jay Gould - in which a noted expert on evolution both recounts the sad history, of which you appear aware, of attempts to misuse evolution
    to argue for racial differences and also defends the truth of what we really learn from evolution on this issue.

    Sure, I'll jump right on it and read more blather from someone educated
    by those in power. Rather, instead of reading the vomit of Stephen Jay
    Gould, you should research Erasmus Darwin and the ancient religious
    origin of his evolutionary model. It originates with the Brahmans, who practiced their religion of evolutionary Aryan supremacy. And unlike
    your evolution theory, this is an actual fact that the theory of
    evolution goes back thousands of years to a racial supremacist, human
    sacrifice cult. A real thinker like Frederick Douglass was able to sniff
    this out as nonsense. Douglass rightly opined what evolution really is:
    a racial supremacist cult that equates Pharaoah's kids as divine Aryans
    and everyone else as inferior racial castes under Pharaoh's superior
    blood power.

    Rather than read more evolutionist swill I will heed the inspired
    counsel of men much better than the apostate, false Christian, Darwin:

    "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane
    and vain babblings, and oppositions of _science_ falsely so called:
    Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with
    thee. Amen." [1 Timothy 6:20-21]

    The Apostles were divinely inspired and knew all about 'science' and its crackpot theories taken from pagan sources. They warned us about it
    almost 2000 years ago.

    Paul the Apostle warned us about this ancient evolutionary human
    sacrifice cult and its satanic ways:

    "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the
    glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible
    man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore
    God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own
    hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed
    the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more
    than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." [Romans 1:22-25]

    This John Savard perches upon. The theory of evolution is a RELIGION. It
    is a religion cooked up thousands of years ago by a racial supremacist
    cult that raped and killed and immolated children as part of its temple rituals. It has always been a religion from antiquity. Dressing it up as "science" is a satanic lie.

    Jesus taught to judge a tree by its fruit. The fruit tells us about the
    root, whether it is good or evil. A good tree brings forth good fruit. A corrupt tree brings forth evil fruit. Evolution is a very evil tree and
    its fruit is death. Jesus Christ is the good tree and his fruit is life.

    I have challenged Savard's "unchallengeable" evolution and I have deftly destroyed it. I have exposed it as an ancient dogma of a child sacrifice
    rape cult with a racial supremacist core. John Savard should change his
    mind while you still can. Jesus Christ is Lord. And He is
    unchallengeable! His Father, God, the only God, created all the races of
    men for his own good will and pleasure. No amount of rebellious,
    Spinozan, Jesuit-inspired, Deist, big-bang gobbledy-gook can change it.

    The religion of scientism achieves the same goals as the oppressive
    cults of the ancient world--to proclaim the state as divine king, and to worship the person of the state as the Roman Caesar instead of the true
    Creator God, Jehovah Elohim.

    This is exemplified by the Pharisees who under the influence of Roman
    religion and politics, proclaimed, "We have no king but Caesar!" Yet the
    Torah that they pretended to believe in teaches that Jehovah and his Son
    are the only rightful Kingship over Israel.

    The cult of evolution is a Trojan horse crafted to make Christians
    proclaim, "We have no king but Caesar!" Evolution is a ideological proxy
    for the power of Rome to occupy the minds of nations. The dogma of
    evolution brings the Pope into the governor's office by the back door.

    John Savard

    --
    NightBulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

    How to get ahead in life:
    Judaism: circumcision. Christianism: lobotomy. Evolution: brainwash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 01:55:04 2023
    "Such a phenomenon can be seen even yet in swamps and marshy places
    whenever, the ground having become cold, the air suddenly and without
    any gradual change becomes intensely warm. And while the wet was being impregnated with life by reason of the warmth in the manner described,
    by night the living things forthwith received their nourishment from the
    mist that fell from the enveloping air, and by day were made solid by
    the intense heat; and finally, when the embryos had attained their full development and the membranes had been thoroughly heated and broken
    open, there was produced every form of animal life."

    Naturalists cannot claim myths are science and remain honest.

    1. Science is observable and testable.
    2. Abiogenesis and the evolution of genera are not observable and testable.
    3. Therefore, abiogenesis and evolution of genera are not science.

    source: https://godsbreath.net/2010/02/19/myth-of-evolution/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 01:49:23 2023
    Evolution is a very ancient religion called 'abiogenesis'. Evolution
    'evolved' from ancient pagan religion long before the modern scientific
    method. Evolution has NO scientific foundation whatsoever. It is a bunch
    of circular reasoning and apriori reasoning used to mantle religious abiogenesis in a lab coat.

    Evolution is much older than Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin got his
    ideas from the religion of his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin.

    Evolution is not science. Evolution is a ancient religion known as
    abiogenesis.

    "Erasmus Darwin, Charles Darwin's grandfather, was the first Briton to explicitly write about evolution. His main prose on the topic appears in
    the first volume of Zoonomia (1794; click here to read his words).
    Erasmus Darwin discusses the descent of life from a common ancestor,
    sexual selection, the analogy of artificial selection as a means to
    understand descent with modification, and a basic concept of what we now
    refer to as homology. His thoughts on the diversity of life and
    evolution also appear in the Loves of the Plants (first published in two
    parts in 1789 and 1791) and his last work, The Temple of Nature,
    published posthumously in 1803. By the end of his life, he was being
    visciously attacked by conservative forces in the British government,
    and as such, lampooned in political cartoons."

    https://early-evolution.oeb.harvard.edu/erasmus-darwin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 01:58:26 2023
    "Ever since Darwin, the concept of natural selection has dominated
    evolutionary thought, providing a "naturalistic" explanation for the
    origin of species, and thus (as Julian Huxley used to say) eliminating
    the need for God. In recent years, however, there has been a strong
    reaction against Darwinian evolution in many places. Unfortunately, the
    change has not caused these scientists to return to creationism, but
    instead, to pre-Darwinian evolutionism. That is, they are abandoning
    atheistic evolution and returning to pantheistic evolution. In fact,
    this is the pseudo-scientific rationale underlying the so-called New Age Movement which is sweeping over the world today."

    https://www.icr.org/article/pantheistic-evolution/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:03:55 2023
    "The modern "theory" of evolution, though not a theory according to the scientific definition, is a theory that carries ancient roots in
    paganism. "The early 20th century evolutionist director of the American
    Museum of Natural History, Henry Fairfield Osborn, showed in his book
    From the Greeks to Darwin ... that all the essential ideas of Darwin’s theory can be found in the writings of ancient Greeks[.]" Osborn wrote, "Evolution has reached its present fullness by slow additions in
    twenty-four centuries. When the truths and absurdities of Greek,
    mediaeval, and sixteenth to nineteenth century speculation and
    observation are brought together, it becomes clear that they form a
    continuous whole, that the influences of early upon later thought are
    greater than has been believed, that Darwin owes more even to the Greeks
    than we have ever recognized." He recognized, "Evolution, as a natural explanation of the origin of the higher forms of life, succeeded the old mythology and autochthony in Greece, and developed from the teachings of
    Thales and Anaximander into those of Aristotle.""

    https://truthwatchers.com/evolution-is-paganism/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:00:53 2023
    "The point, however, is that the doctrine of evolution has swept the
    world, not on the strength of its scientific merits, but precisely in
    its capacity as a Gnostic myth. It affirms, in effect, that living
    beings created themselves, which is, in essence, a metaphysical
    claim.... Thus, in the final analysis, evolutionism is in truth a
    metaphysical doctrine decked out in scientific garb."

    https://www.icr.org/article/pantheistic-evolution/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:14:39 2023
    Erasmus Darwin was involved with Freemasonry. Erasmus publicized his Freemasonic belief in the dogma of abiogenics, or evolution. This is a long-held belief of the Freemasons, a pagan cult.

    Erasmus passed this Freemason dogma on to his grandson, Charles Darwin.
    It is anti-scientific, and never had anything to do with any scientific
    method. As noted elsewhere, it was a nearly universal belief of the
    ancient, pagan, human sacrifice cults of the world.

    Modern pagans dress up evolution in scientific jargon and pawn it off on
    a gullible public as "science."

    "Erasmus’ affiliation with Freemasonry is the obvious influence of this metaphysical evolution into deity as is made clear by leading Masonic
    authors that state such ideologies originate from their pagan roots.
    Masonic author W.L. Wilmshurst writes, “This—the evolution of man into superman—was always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of modern Masonry is, not the social and charitable purposes to
    which so much attention is paid, but the evolution of those who aspire
    to perfect their own nature and transform it into more god-like
    quality.”23) Again, he states, “Man who has sprung from the earth and developed through the lower kingdoms of nature to his present rational
    state, has yet to complete his evolution by becoming a god-like being
    and unifying his consciousness with the Omniscient—to promote which is
    and always has been the sole aim and purpose of Initiation.”24) He elaborates, “No higher level of attainment is possible than that in
    which the human merges in the Divine consciousness and knows as God knows.”25)"

    source: https://truthwatchers.com/evolution-is-paganism/

    --
    NightBulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

    How to get ahead in life:
    Judaism: circumcision. Christianism: lobotomy. Evolution: brainwash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:06:22 2023
    Irenaeus wrote about another pagan philosopher, “Anaxagoras [510-428
    B.C.], again, who has been surnamed ‘Atheist,’ gave it as his opinion
    that animals were formed from seeds falling down from heaven upon
    earth.”8) This is known today as “Direct Panspermia,” propagated by
    Losif Schlovsky and Carl Sagan, authors of Intelligent Life in the
    Universe (1966); Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel, who wrote Direct
    Panspermia (1973); and more recently by Stephen Hawking in various
    articles. This is also subtly presented within the Intelligent Design
    movements as the leaders remain ambiguous to define the designer they
    identify with, only that it is “intelligent”—not omniscient as biblical theism presents. Osborn wrote about Anaxagoras back in 1894, stated, “According to Plato and Aristotle, this philosopher [Anagoras] was the
    first to attribute adaptation in Nature to Inelligent Design, and was
    thus the founder of Teleology.”9) Notice that it is Nature which becomes
    the Intelligent Designer. That is exactly the implications of “natural selection”—nature attributed with selective intelligence. “‘Nature’ cannot select without being cast in personal teleological terms.”10)
    Natural selection is actually a logical fallacy known as “reification” which is “committed when a person attributes a concrete and often
    personal characteristic to a conceptual abstraction.”11)

    https://truthwatchers.com/evolution-is-paganism/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:25:15 2023
    The popularity of evolution lay in the fact that it is repeated as
    "fact" a zillion times from primary school to university, so that the
    student is programmed to accept it through peer pressure rather than
    evidence.

    No scientific observation has ever observed evolution, or repeated it.
    Since it can't be observed or repeated, evolutionists claim that their religious theory is exempt from the normal rules of scientific inquiry.
    They then claim that science is a "democracy" in which truth is
    established by "consensus." This of course is how all religions operate.
    The "leaders" of the cult establish what is "true" by their "consensus."

    In real science this is known as a /unfalsifiable/ claim. Real science
    rejects unfalsifiable claims as rubbish. Evolution is not science.
    Evolution is a religion. Every person claiming it is not a religion is
    either a liar, or a brainwashed dupe with scientific stockholme
    syndrome. Many victims of brainwashing defend their victimizers. We see
    a lot of this in the evolution cult.

    The truth is much simpler than the religion of evolution.

    The Omnipotent God created everything that exists. All species were
    created after their kind, not by a process of evolution, but
    supernaturally, by a person far above, and far more resplendent than nature.

    Evolutionists hate God because he judges them and condemns them for
    their crimes against their fellow man. Evolutionists desire a God that
    allows the strong to prey upon the weak. Thus "Survival of the Fittest"
    is their religion--a god of their own making that lets them profit from
    their criminality and dishonesty, especially their scientific fraud.

    --
    NightBulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

    How to get ahead in life:
    Judaism: circumcision. Christianism: lobotomy. Evolution: brainwash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NightBulb@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 02:50:36 2023
    Some of the world's foremost authorities on evolution have admitted its religious character.

    Snippets
    --------

    Evolutionists often insist that evolution is a proved fact of science, providing the very framework of scientific interpretation, especially in
    the biological sciences. This, of course, is nothing but wishful
    thinking. Evolution is not even a scientific hypothesis, since there is
    no conceivable way in which it can be tested.

    THE RELIGIOUS ESSENCE OF EVOLUTIONISM

    As a matter of fact, many leading evolutionists have recognized the
    essentially "religious" character of evolutionism. Even though they
    themselves believe evolution to be true, they acknowledge the fact that
    they believe it! "Science", however, is not supposed to be something one "believes". Science is knowledge—that which can be demonstrated and
    observed and repeated. Evolution cannot be proved, or even tested; it
    can only be believed.

    [.....]

    Charles Darwin himself called evolution "this grand view of life". Now
    such grandiloquent terms as these are not scientific terms! One does not
    call the law of gravity, for example, "a satisfactory faith", nor speak
    of the laws of thermodynamics as "dogma". Evolution is, indeed, a grand
    world view, but it is not science. Its very comprehensiveness makes it impossible even to test scientifically. As Ehrlich and Birch have said:
    "Every conceivable observation can be fitted into it.—No one can think
    of ways in which to test it".

    source: https://www.icr.org/article/evolution-religion-not-science/

    --
    NightBulb | https://blog.nightbulb.net | Flip the night switch.

    How to get ahead in life:
    Judaism: circumcision. Christianism: lobotomy. Evolution: brainwash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerald Kelleher@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 8 01:17:01 2023
    I make the distinction between natural selection and evolution otherwise it is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Evolutionary sciences were perfectly fine and promoted by many Christians such as Buckland and especially Steno where the fossil
    record found in rock strata read like a history book as faunal and geological succession

    https://imgproxy.geocaching.com/e5e240f139f6a390f34ee6101499e5327ac6c475?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaT6bJjX.jpg

    The Victorian natural selection conviction is altogether different as it tried to introduce a narrative for humanity in imitation of faunal succession using cultural or complexion distinctions along with the junk research of skull shape ( phrenology)-

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Races_and_skulls.png

    Natural selection is a variation of Malthus where the dominance of the aggressive is meant to represent civilised 'races'-

    "An Alaric, an Attila, or a Zingis Khan, and the chiefs around them, might fight for glory, for the fame of extensive conquests, but the true cause that set in motion the great tide of northern emigration, and that continued to propel it till it rolled
    at different periods against China, Persia, Italy, and even Egypt, was a scarcity of food, a population extended beyond the means of supporting it." Thomas Malthus

    " I do not think that the Rev. Mr. Zincke takes an exaggerated view when he says: "All other series of events—as that which resulted in the culture of mind in Greece, and that which resulted in the empire of Rome—only appear to have purpose and value
    when viewed in connection with, or rather as subsidiary to… the great stream of Anglo-Saxon emigration to the west." Obscure as is the problem of the advance of civilisation, we can at least see that a nation which produced during a lengthened period
    the greatest number of highly intellectual, energetic, brave, patriotic, and benevolent men, would generally prevail over less favoured nations." Darwin

    If geneticists continue to support natural selection as a viable narrative, they will ruin the ability to track the ancient movements of people across the geography of the planet, notwithstanding the terrible damage the colonial expansion excuse has
    already done.

    The Victorians were forthright in their perspectives, albeit totally dangerous and misguided, whereas their present followers try to excuse or bury the misadventure with the Earth science of biology by misusing the evolutionary narrative. Humanity needs
    less polarisation and more integrity in these matters- it is the Christian thing to do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)