The idea of satellites launched into orbit on rockets into "outer space"
is a fraud and hoax invented by your rulers. Outer space as you have
been indoctrinated to believe, does not exist. It's a scam. The
government can't get anything to go higher than about 50 miles. At that altitude rocket thrusters can't even combust due to the near vacuum conditions. Combustion cannot occur in a vacuum, not even with solid propellant. It just will not combust.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 3:30:12 PM UTC-7, Balloonatics wrote:
The idea of satellites launched into orbit on rockets into "outer space"Rockets carry oxidizer with them, in addition to fuel. So there is no particular reason why they won't work in a vacuum; they're designed
is a fraud and hoax invented by your rulers. Outer space as you have
been indoctrinated to believe, does not exist. It's a scam. The
government can't get anything to go higher than about 50 miles. At that altitude rocket thrusters can't even combust due to the near vacuum conditions. Combustion cannot occur in a vacuum, not even with solid propellant. It just will not combust.
to be able to do precisely that.
I'll admit that if satellites were really balloons, this would open up exciting possibilities. It would make it possible for the Earth to be
flat. Except for other problems with a flat Earth, like how wide
Australia would have to be.
All "satellites" are high-altitude balloons carrying solar arrays and
radio equipment.
Normally these balloons are 22 to 34 miles aloft. Balloons at this
distance are invisible. The distance and atmospheric distortion is
enough that it is not possible to make out the structure of such a
balloon even with a telescope.
NASA is the world's #1 consumer of helium. That's because they have the
most "satellites" in "space." The satellites are just balloons. There
are not satellites orbiting at high speeds. It is not even possible to
get a rocket above 35-50 miles of altitude. At that altitude the lack of atmosphere and lack of air pressure render combustion and thrust
physically impossible.
The "Chinese spy balloon" was probably just one of these satellites malfunctioning and falling too low from a problem with the helium
regulator. Likely the government needed a cover story to explain why
such a huge balloon with a satellite radio array clearly attached was
visible in U.S. air space. They don't want you to put two and two
together to realize that all "satellites" actually are just these kinds
of very large balloons. You might ask where the trillions of dollars for space programs has been going.
The idea of satellites launched into orbit on rockets into "outer space"
is a fraud and hoax invented by your rulers. Outer space as you have
been indoctrinated to believe, does not exist. It's a scam. The
government can't get anything to go higher than about 50 miles. At that altitude rocket thrusters can't even combust due to the near vacuum conditions. Combustion cannot occur in a vacuum, not even with solid propellant. It just will not combust.
You live in the matrix, a world of lies, a prison for your mind. The scientific "community" is a priesthood that is principal player in the
grift.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:38:31 PM UTC-7, StarDust wrote:
Then, how do rockets fly to the Moon or Mars or even land?Well, if the Earth is flat, it follows that the Moon landings must have
been faked.
John Savard
Then, how do rockets fly to the Moon or Mars or even land?
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 3:30:12 PM UTC-7, Balloonatics wrote:
The idea of satellites launched into orbit on rockets into "outer space"
is a fraud and hoax invented by your rulers. Outer space as you have
been indoctrinated to believe, does not exist. It's a scam. The
government can't get anything to go higher than about 50 miles. At that
altitude rocket thrusters can't even combust due to the near vacuum
conditions. Combustion cannot occur in a vacuum, not even with solid
propellant. It just will not combust.
Rockets carry oxidizer with them, in addition to fuel. So there is no >particular reason why they won't work in a vacuum; they're designed
to be able to do precisely that.
I'll admit that if satellites were really balloons, this would open up >exciting possibilities. It would make it possible for the Earth to be
flat. Except for other problems with a flat Earth, like how wide
Australia would have to be.
John Savard
All "satellites" are high-altitude balloons carrying solar arrays and
radio equipment.
Normally these balloons are 22 to 34 miles aloft. Balloons at this
distance are invisible. The distance and atmospheric distortion is
enough that it is not possible to make out the structure of such a
balloon even with a telescope.
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 17:30:12 UTC-5, Balloonatics wrote:
All "satellites" are high-altitude balloons carrying solar arrays and
radio equipment.
Normally these balloons are 22 to 34 miles aloft. Balloons at this
distance are invisible. The distance and atmospheric distortion is
enough that it is not possible to make out the structure of such a
balloon even with a telescope.
Not that balloon the Chinese launched, it was very large. Remember the resolution of a telescope and that the balloon if seen at a steep angle
would avoid most of the atmospheric disturbances.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 298 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 02:54:02 |
| Calls: | 6,676 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 12,219 |
| Messages: | 5,339,933 |