In article <39bb67a1.0@news1.mweb.co.za>,
"Sabsy" <sabsy@my-deja.com> wrote:
not
"Steve Hayes" <khanyaiis@global.co.za> wrote in message >>news:39bb3e0c.12750756@news.worldonline.co.za...
It is defamatory because it is mostly used by white racists to belittle
blacks.
I am not aware of that. The term I know to be derogatory is "nigger" and
Negroid.a
It's used so frequently for that purpose nowadays that to my ears it
sounds a lot worse than milder terms like "kaffir" and "nigger".
We have to be careful to find everything derogatory even if it is not >>intended as such. Negroid is a proper deravative if Negro, while Nigger is >>an improper derivative of Negro. I have no problem in being referred to as
Negro, except that I am not one.
Doesn't 'kaffir' have a neutral origin too?
I am not saying one should use it today, but your argumentation is >selective....
In article <8pdn0m$snh$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, mnantczak@my-deja.com wrote:
In article <8pcks9$kna$1@mozo.cc.purdue.edu>,
Eriavierta <md_kennedy@yahoo.com> wrote:
People who want to control what other pople say and think are the
scarriest of all. Wasn't Mandella inprisioned for politcal speech?
I recall the main reason for his imprisonment was a call for
violence, and the subsequent refusal to abstain from it in public....that's
a bit different, eh?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:01:14 |
Calls: | 6,645 |
Files: | 12,190 |
Messages: | 5,326,920 |