https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj0h-HOZHMk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj0h-HOZHMk
Well you're up against three insurmountable obstacles, or
so it seems:
#1. The near impossibility of unlearning.
People learned savanna idiocy, it's been pounded into skulls
for generations so you're not just asking them to learn
something new, you're asking them to unlearn something old.
#2. Unrelenting snobbery.
There is no such thing as a classless society and FROM IT'S
VERY BEGINNINGS paleo anthropology has been top-down,
authoritarian nonsense. Even before Piltdown Man, we had
Darwin whose idea of "Evolution" exactly matched the views
of Stalin & Mao only they REJECTED EVOLUTION! Seriously,
the communist world REJECTED EVOLUTION for decades,
and in it's place they taught a competing theory that was a
very close match to Darwin's ideas. And why not? They both
plagiarized the same source: Lamarckism. But Darwin was
one of their own so instead of the real geniuses like Wallace
or Mendel they heaped credit & honors upon the undeserving
blue blood...
#3. It's all politics.
"Out of Africa" purity isn't just politics but official policy.
The evil in charge has decided that their racism is legitimate
and if everyone knew what they knew then they'd be just as
racist, so they have to hide the truth. Because racism never
existed before, right? I mean, nobody ever thought racism
was legitimate, and certainly not before the 20th century, so
if anyone finds out about facts then suddenly racism will
exist and... and... well, that's about it.
But Out of Africa is official policy. Contradictory facts, competing
ideas and alternative explanations of even the "Accepted" data
are not entertained.
Interbreeding was virtually never in doubt. It had been established
before I was born. Yet, it was never ever acknowledged until 2010
when the Neanderthal genome was published.
Why?
All the fake DNA "data" proving Out of Africa? It's all based on
assumptions that we know aren't true -- like that mtDNA isn't
subject to selection/evolutionary pressures -- or even the cold
hard fact of the LM3 insert along Chromosome 11, proving
that BILLIONS of people can trace their ancestry to Oceania. And,
what's more, it's far older than any "Mitochondrial Eve" if we go
by the standards of the "Out of Africa" purists... Their own
damn standards!
IF and I do mean IF we interpret ALL THE DNA EVIDENCE the same
way the Out of Africa purists interpret their "Mitochondrial Eve"
data, modern man began in Australia or vicinity, then migrated into
Africa...
Not saying that's right, but it does clearly prove that the status quo
is wrong. And this leaves us with a rather interesting predicament
where we must conclude that all the top-tier paleo anthropologists
are morons, knuckle dragging imbeciles who are lucky to survive
without drowning in their own urine, they're so stupid, or they have
a socio-political agenda and NOT one of science.
Yeah, they can go ahead and bite me... the twits.
So that's what you're up against. https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/691908725120876544
our nearest relatives are the African Pan & Gorilla,
Afr.apes live in forests & are QP [on the ground and BP on branches]
savanna baboons are more QP than forest baboons etc.
we live in [shelters constructed from the forest]
Our bipedalism originated arboreally.
DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
Our bipedalism originated arboreally.
No it didn't. Chimps evolved FROM upright walkers to knuckle walkers,
and they did so in adaptation to the forest. It looks like Gorillas did the same.
But just look at Chimps, as that's more than enough to fill your little skull to capacity. The LCA was more recent than bipedal locomotion.
The foramen magnum migrated to the back of the skull. The Chimp
hand evolved away from our own and towards the arboreally adapted
hand they now have.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 292 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 203:31:50 |
Calls: | 6,617 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,168 |
Messages: | 5,316,465 |