https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8?si=qGtZYPeWVEKssoFW https://youtu.be/RZ_0ImDYrPY?si=pVzz6ZlOF3HbDZ8O

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8?si=qGtZYPeWVEKssoFW https://youtu.be/RZ_0ImDYrPY?si=pVzz6ZlOF3HbDZ8O

Golf carts don't have much in the way of
controls. Here's an older video of dogs
who were "taught" to drive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAK0J8Uhzk

Almost creepy.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 14.10.2024. 8:15, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

On 14.10.2024. 6:51, Primum Sapienti wrote:

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8?si=qGtZYPeWVEKssoFW
https://youtu.be/RZ_0ImDYrPY?si=pVzz6ZlOF3HbDZ8O

Golf carts don't have much in the way of
controls. Here's an older video of dogs
who were "taught" to drive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAK0J8Uhzk

Almost creepy.

        Yes, stupid scientists deliberately take an animal, put it out
if its context, and then they debate how animals are actually unable to
do the task. It is obvious that those dogs don't know what are they
doing there, and why. And they don't care, and they are not built at all
to do the task. We all can see videos how cats slap dogs, and dogs
cannot do anything about it. Because dogs cannot rotate their paws (this
is why they cannot climb trees). So, those dogs are completely out of
the context. This orangutan, on the other hand, fits very well, and all
your stupid excuses don't hold water in my view. Here is a dog that is
more into context, and his control is better than what I would do: https://youtube.com/shorts/kvFKIovjbWo?si=_QfWsqq-_4fSor8F
        And here is an animal that walks bipedally better than humans would:
https://youtu.be/a0_nzhAC74g?si=bMcJs7_fDXLwp4-x
        So, all your fairy tales about humans almighty share with your
pastor, and cut it out of science.

And if you, and all those scientists, would be any smart, they would
realize that this ape shows that bipedality doesn't explain human
adaptations in pelvis and the s-curve. My theory, on the other hand,
perfectly explains those, but, of course, no stupid scientist care at all.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 14.10.2024. 6:51, Primum Sapienti wrote:

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

https://youtu.be/ERTrOwEb5M8?si=qGtZYPeWVEKssoFW
https://youtu.be/RZ_0ImDYrPY?si=pVzz6ZlOF3HbDZ8O

Golf carts don't have much in the way of
controls. Here's an older video of dogs
who were "taught" to drive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAK0J8Uhzk

Almost creepy.

Yes, stupid scientists deliberately take an animal, put it out if its
context, and then they debate how animals are actually unable to do the
task. It is obvious that those dogs don't know what are they doing
there, and why. And they don't care, and they are not built at all to do
the task. We all can see videos how cats slap dogs, and dogs cannot do
anything about it. Because dogs cannot rotate their paws (this is why
they cannot climb trees). So, those dogs are completely out of the
context. This orangutan, on the other hand, fits very well, and all your
stupid excuses don't hold water in my view. Here is a dog that is more
into context, and his control is better than what I would do: https://youtube.com/shorts/kvFKIovjbWo?si=_QfWsqq-_4fSor8F
And here is an animal that walks bipedally better than humans would:
https://youtu.be/a0_nzhAC74g?si=bMcJs7_fDXLwp4-x
So, all your fairy tales about humans almighty share with your pastor,
and cut it out of science.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)