• Change in gene code may explain how human ancestors lost tails

    From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 28 22:37:12 2024
    https://phys.org/news/2024-02-gene-code-human-ancestors-lost.html

    A genetic change in our ancient ancestors may
    partly explain why humans don't have tails
    like monkeys, finds a new study led by
    researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

    Published online February 28 as the cover story
    of the journal Nature, the work compared the
    DNA of tail-less apes and humans to that of
    tailed monkeys, and found an insertion of DNA
    shared by apes and humans, but missing in
    monkeys.

    When the research team engineered a series of
    mice to examine whether the insertion, in a gene
    called TBXT, affected their tails, they found a
    variety of tail effects, including some mice
    born without tails.
    ...
    Remarkably, say the study authors, the new study
    found that the differences in tails came not from
    TBXT mutations, but instead from the insertion of
    a DNA snippet called AluY into the gene's
    regulatory code in the ancestors of apes and
    humans.
    ...


    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07095-8
    On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in
    humans and apes

    Abstract
    The loss of the tail is among the most notable
    anatomical changes to have occurred along the
    evolutionary lineage leading to humans and to
    the ‘anthropomorphous apes', with a proposed
    role in contributing to human bipedalism. Yet,
    the genetic mechanism that facilitated tail-loss
    evolution in hominoids remains unknown. Here we
    present evidence that an individual insertion
    of an Alu element in the genome of the hominoid
    ancestor may have contributed to tail-loss
    evolution. We demonstrate that this Alu
    element—inserted into an intron of the TBXT
    gene—pairs with a neighbouring ancestral Alu
    element encoded in the reverse genomic
    orientation and leads to a hominoid-specific
    alternative splicing event. To study the
    effect of this splicing event, we generated
    multiple mouse models that express both
    full-length and exon-skipped isoforms of
    Tbxt, mimicking the expression pattern of its
    hominoid orthologue TBXT. Mice expressing both
    Tbxt isoforms exhibit a complete absence of
    the tail or a shortened tail depending on the
    relative abundance of Tbxt isoforms expressed
    at the embryonic tail bud. These results support
    the notion that the exon-skipped transcript is
    sufficient to induce a tail-loss phenotype.
    Moreover, mice expressing the exon-skipped Tbxt
    isoform develop neural tube defects, a condition
    that affects approximately 1 in 1,000 neonates
    in humans10. Thus, tail-loss evolution may have
    been associated with an adaptive cost of the
    potential for neural tube defects, which
    continue to affect human health today.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Thu Feb 29 11:34:55 2024
    On 29.2.2024. 6:37, Primum Sapienti wrote:

    https://phys.org/news/2024-02-gene-code-human-ancestors-lost.html

    A genetic change in our ancient ancestors may
    partly explain why humans don't have tails
    like monkeys, finds a new study led by
    researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

    Published online February 28 as the cover story
    of the journal Nature, the work compared the
    DNA of tail-less apes and humans to that of
    tailed monkeys, and found an insertion of DNA
    shared by apes and humans, but missing in
    monkeys.

    When the research team engineered a series of
    mice to examine whether the insertion, in a gene
    called TBXT, affected their tails, they found a
    variety of tail effects, including some mice
    born without tails.
    ...
    Remarkably, say the study authors, the new study
    found that the differences in tails came not from
    TBXT mutations, but instead from the insertion of
    a DNA snippet called AluY into the gene's
    regulatory code in the ancestors of apes and
    humans.
    ...


    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07095-8
    On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in
    humans and apes

    Abstract
    The loss of the tail is among the most notable
    anatomical changes to have occurred along the
    evolutionary lineage leading to humans and to
    the ‘anthropomorphous apes', with a proposed
    role in contributing to human bipedalism. Yet,
    the genetic mechanism that facilitated tail-loss
    evolution in hominoids remains unknown. Here we
    present evidence that an individual insertion
    of an Alu element in the genome of the hominoid
    ancestor may have contributed to tail-loss
    evolution. We demonstrate that this Alu
    element—inserted into an intron of the TBXT
    gene—pairs with a neighbouring ancestral Alu
    element encoded in the reverse genomic
    orientation and leads to a hominoid-specific
    alternative splicing event. To study the
    effect of this splicing event, we generated
    multiple mouse models that express both
    full-length and exon-skipped isoforms of
    Tbxt, mimicking the expression pattern of its
    hominoid orthologue TBXT. Mice expressing both
    Tbxt isoforms exhibit a complete absence of
    the tail or a shortened tail depending on the
    relative abundance of Tbxt isoforms expressed
    at the embryonic tail bud. These results support
    the notion that the exon-skipped transcript is
    sufficient to induce a tail-loss phenotype.
    Moreover, mice expressing the exon-skipped Tbxt
    isoform develop neural tube defects, a condition
    that affects approximately 1 in 1,000 neonates
    in humans10. Thus, tail-loss evolution may have
    been associated with an adaptive cost of the
    potential for neural tube defects, which
    continue to affect human health today.

    Oh, of course. Either gene code, or climate. This becomes easier and
    easier. Soon we will find out that everything emerged in seven days. By
    the way of gene code and climate, lol.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sun Mar 10 22:52:44 2024
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    On 29.2.2024. 6:37, Primum Sapienti wrote:



            Oh, of course. Either gene code, or climate. This becomes easier and easier. Soon we will find out that everything emerged in
    seven days. By the way of gene code and climate, lol.

    Heh. They look like they've found the gene(s)
    responsible but the mutation's cause is less
    clear. Seems pretty specific to the apes though
    the Barabary macaque is also tailless. Wonder
    if they have the same mutation...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)