JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

This is a very, Very, VERY old subject of argument.

Seems impossible that any so called "Moderns" after 50k years
ago were already hybrids. They met in the middle east.

"Dah."

So any mixing happened there. They were already hybrids when
they entered Europe.

As for Europe, Wolpoff showed physical evidence for hybridization
well beyond that.

The point is that you don't look down at South Africa at 45k years
ago and see a lot of Cor Magnon..or any. They ARE the hybrid!

https://youtu.be/FlR22hcjp_w?feature=shared&t=121

There. The physical evidence never supported your nonsense.

erectus in South Africa around 2mya

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans

The multiregional hypothesis is not currently the
most accepted theory of modern human origin among
scientists. "The African replacement model has
gained the widest acceptance owing mainly to
genetic data (particularly mitochondrial DNA)
from existing populations. This model is consistent
with the realization that modern humans cannot be
classified into subspecies or races, and it
recognizes that all populations of present-day
humans share the same potential."[3] The African
replacement model is also known as the "Out of
Africa" theory. See also, "The 'out of Africa'
model is currently the most widely accepted model.
It proposes that Homo sapiens evolved in Africa
before migrating across the world."[4] And: "The
primary competing scientific hypothesis is
currently recent African origin of modern humans,
which proposes that modern humans arose as a new
species in Africa around 100-200,000 years ago,
moving out of Africa around 50-60,000 years ago
to replace existing human species such as Homo
erectus and the Neanderthals without
interbreeding.[5][6][7][8] This differs from the
multiregional hypothesis in that the multiregional
model predicts interbreeding with preexisting
local human populations in any such migration."

Maybe your space aliens helped them ;)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

Primum Sapienti wrote:

The multiregional hypothesis is not currently the
most accepted theory of modern human origin among
scientists.

Interbreeding was widely & quite loudly denounced, even though
the evidence was quite clear generations ago, and even after
Trinkaus put the matter to rest with his work. It was still
popularly believed AND DEFENDED that there was no interbreeding.

The fact is that we do have different populations. Period.

Utterly irrelevant at thse recent dates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans

"The African replacement model has
gained the widest acceptance owing mainly to
genetic data (particularly mitochondrial DNA)

I've explained this to you and others so many times that I can
guarantee that you will read almost nothing and understand
even less:

Modern Europeans haven't been in places like South America
and Africa for very long, in terms of human origins, yet they
have already completely swamped the DNA of many a local
dog breed, including the Pharaoh Hound of Egypt...

Yet, when the exact same pattern pattern emerges in human
DNA, you insist that it proves the classic "Replacement"
model.

Wow.

Talk about "Dogmatic"... Sheesh!

You certainly are.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)