1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ANTHROPOLOGY.PALEO

  • Nintendo's Mario is WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 24 22:25:32 2023
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446990/

    Not sure I'm completely digging what it's saying. For
    one thing this molecular dating is always wrong. And
    for another thing, anything to do with Africa has to
    come under scrutiny because of the politicalization of
    paleo anthropology and it's demand for Out of Africa
    purity despite any and all facts. (Just make up new
    facts!)

    But the study is linking DHA, Waterside evolution and
    the lack of proper sources inland.








    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/734926832804200448

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Sat Nov 25 10:29:52 2023
    On 25.11.2023. 7:25, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446990/

    Not sure I'm completely digging what it's saying. For
    one thing this molecular dating is always wrong. And
    for another thing, anything to do with Africa has to
    come under scrutiny because of the politicalization of
    paleo anthropology and it's demand for Out of Africa
    purity despite any and all facts. (Just make up new
    facts!)

    But the study is linking DHA, Waterside evolution and
    the lack of proper sources inland.

    What exactly do you want to say? That people got to the sea only 85
    ka, and because of that they spread all around, where there isn't a sea?
    How long I will have to watch those scientific procedures where
    scientists know the result before they even performed the experiment.
    They are desperately searching for a procedure which will prove the
    result that they already know.
    So, they "found out" suddenly that something in our brain demands sea
    resources, and because of that humans spread. No, humans didn't spread,
    only the trait that changes chewing apparatus spread. Chewing muscles
    changed, not the brain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc Verhaegen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 25 03:58:19 2023
    Op zaterdag 25 november 2023 om 10:29:54 UTC+1 schreef Mario Petrinovic:
    On 25.11.2023. 7:25, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446990/
    Not sure I'm completely digging what it's saying. For
    one thing this molecular dating is always wrong. And
    for another thing, anything to do with Africa has to
    come under scrutiny because of the politicalization of
    paleo anthropology and it's demand for Out of Africa
    purity despite any and all facts. (Just make up new
    facts!)
    But the study is linking DHA, Waterside evolution and
    the lack of proper sources inland.

    What exactly do you want to say? That people got to the sea only 85
    ka, and because of that they spread all around, where there isn't a sea?
    How long I will have to watch those scientific procedures where
    scientists know the result before they even performed the experiment.
    They are desperately searching for a procedure which will prove the
    result that they already know.
    So, they "found out" suddenly that something in our brain demands sea resources, and because of that humans spread. No, humans didn't spread,
    only the trait that changes chewing apparatus spread. Chewing muscles changed, not the brain.

    :-DDD
    What exactly do you want to say?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)