The *only* argument of savanna believers against human waterside evolut
From
littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to
All on Sun Oct 29 06:24:06 2023
Some antelope runner:
"Why don't you skip all of that, because you really aren't making any sense."
:-DDD
There's 0 doubt: early-Pleist.H.erectus were predom.molluscivores:
- fossilisations amid edible shellfish: Trinil, Mojokerto, Sangiran...
- shell engravings made by erectus, google "Munro Joordens"
- pachy-osteo-sclerotic skeleton heavy+dense+thick = shallow-diving
- huge brain cf. dolphins, seals, otters...: DHA, taurine... in aquatic foods
- Homo's stone tool use = sea-otter
- ear-exostoses in erectus = chronic colder water irrigation
- island colonisations far oversea: Flores, Luzon...
- extreme dexterity & thumb force & mobility, cf sea-otter
- tooth wear by "sand & oral processing of marine mollusks" Towle 2022
Only *incredible* imbeciles still believe their ancestors ran after antelopes, sweating water+salt (=sea-water) in savannas! :-DDD
Human evolution, see my 2022 book, google "Verhaegen Bonne English".
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)