Investigating the drivers of tool use in animals
has recently received great attention because of
its implication in understanding animals’
cognition and the evolution of tool use in
hominins.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
Investigating the drivers of tool use in animals
has recently received great attention because of
its implication in understanding animals’
cognition and the evolution of tool use in
hominins.
This is idiocy. When this jackwads can't differentiate hominins
from birds or even invertebrates, as their misuse of "tools"
would apply to all, what is even the point?
The way they define "Tool use," it's unknown and unknowable.
MONKEYS USE TOOLS, going by the idiotic way this jackwads
define it. NEW WORLD MONKEYS!
So we're talking, what? Only 35,000,000 years of New World
Monkeys and... oops! They were already diversifying by then!
They'd been around longer, for sure...
So their "tool use" probably goes back at least that far, if the
way they misuse "tools" is applied consistently and..
Oops. Invertebrate, at least some of them, qualify as "tool
users" under their idiocy. So why not the Cambrian Explosion?
The point here, because idiots need it spelled out for them, the
stupid way they misuse "Tools" guarantees we can only "study"
the merest fraction of even the recent history of these so called
"Tools." We have a mega fragmentary sampling from less than
1% of the history of probable tool use, a lot less, and you want to
pretend we can work out it's evolution?
Can any of these morons even breath through their noses without
tripping?
Primum Sapienti wrote:
Investigating the drivers of tool use in animals
has recently received great attention because of
its implication in understanding animals’
cognition and the evolution of tool use in
hominins.
This is idiocy. When this jackwads can't differentiate hominins
from birds or even invertebrates, as their misuse of "tools"
would apply to all, what is even the point?
The way they define "Tool use," it's unknown and unknowable.
MONKEYS USE TOOLS, going by the idiotic way this jackwads
define it. NEW WORLD MONKEYS!
So we're talking, what? Only 35,000,000 years of New World
Monkeys and... oops! They were already diversifying by then!
They'd been around longer, for sure...
So their "tool use" probably goes back at least that far, if the
way they misuse "tools" is applied consistently and..
Oops. Invertebrate, at least some of them, qualify as "tool
users" under their idiocy. So why not the Cambrian Explosion?
The point here, because idiots need it spelled out for them, the
stupid way they misuse "Tools" guarantees we can only "study"
the merest fraction of even the recent history of these so called
"Tools." We have a mega fragmentary sampling from less than
1% of the history of probable tool use, a lot less, and you want to
pretend we can work out it's evolution?
Can any of these morons even breath through their noses without
tripping?
Do dolphins use tools?
kudu runner wrote:
Do dolphins use tools?
If you had reading comprehension you would know that you
already received an answer.
This is not primary school and I am not your teacher. And
neither am I your therapist.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 96:58:39 |
Calls: | 6,764 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,295 |
Messages: | 5,376,370 |
Posted today: | 1 |