https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2023/09/20/archaeologists-discover-worlds-oldest-wooden-structure/
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2023/09/20/archaeologists-discover-worlds-oldest-wooden-structure/
I hate to be a douche bag (no I doubt) but, in all honesty, I doubt
the story.
Science is gone. Archaic skulls are now labelled as "Anatomically
Modern." Fury cave monkeys breathed smoke, buried their dead
and had writing or at least proto writing/symbols.. but nobody
found a tool in 8 years.
Gwobull Warbling is the worst. I read some media turd where
"Scientist" discovered that acidic sea water was literally melting
the ocean floor..and this was determined without the benefit of
a single observation. They didn't even bother to test the PH level
of the ocean, which is NOT acidic! It's the opposite, it's "Base."
Another "Science" report claimed that a massive chunk of ice
was going to break off, fall into the ocean and then slowly, over
100 years, raise sea level as it melts. Again, utter rubbish. Ice
raised water levels the moment you place it in the water, not as
it melts. Primary school children learn this, but not "Scientists."
Anyway, "Out of Africa" purity is policy. It's the official narrative,
part of the "We're all really the same!" narrative. But we're NOT
all really the same. And we are all EXACTLY as closely related
to each other if we originate in Asia, Europe or Oceania as we
are if we originated in Africa. It's politics, a social program, and
it's stupid.
It's insane. On the one hand they're claiming that African
descended from fury cave monkeys (Naledi) long AFTER Homo
erectus, Heidelberg Man and possibly even Neanderthal, and
on the other we're all exactly the same...
Naledi is significantly YOUNGER than the claim for this wooden
house. And there are no prepared burials BY HOMO SAPIENS
within 100,000 years of Naledi. But they're claiming that they
were a human ancestor with modern brains & buried there
dead... so Africans are simultaneously extremely different
from non Africans, and they are none other than us in a
different place.
Paleo anthropology is NOT a real science.
Placing "Paleo" before "Anthropology" is akin to placing
"Biblical" in front of "Archaeology," only vastly less honest.
After all, the biblical archaeologists state their bias right
up front. They know that they begin with their answers and
go looking for the proof. They never tried to hide it.
THEN you add the fact that there's no more journalism
and just forget about "Science." Forget about education!
The powers that be not only shuttered the school, back
in 2020, because someone coughed but, they keep
ordering the kids to stage "Walk out" to protest Gwobull
Warbling.
Why, on Earth, I am reading your posts?
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
Why, on Earth, I am reading your posts?
There's no evidence that you can read.
I mean, you infest this news group with long, unconnected posts
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
I mean, you infest this news group with long, unconnected posts
Said the guy talking about 10 million year old humans running
around setting pig nests on fire.
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
I mean, you infest this news group with long, unconnected posts
Said the guy talking about 10 million year old humans running
around setting pig nests on fire.
So, what's wrong with that? Are you vegetarian?
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
I mean, you infest this news group with long, unconnected posts
Said the guy talking about 10 million year old humans running
around setting pig nests on fire.
So, what's wrong with that? Are you vegetarian?
Other than the fact that there was no controlled use of fire back
then, no humans and no pigs, either? Absolutely nothing.
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
So, what's wrong with that? Are you vegetarian?
Other than the fact that there was no controlled use of fire back
then, no humans and no pigs, either? Absolutely nothing.
Does burning pig nests look to you as a controlled use of fire?
There were no pigs, no humans and no controlled use of fire.
For
controlled use of fire you need to have hearth, firepit.
No,. what you need is a method to set a fire.
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Mario Petrinovic wrote:
So, what's wrong with that? Are you vegetarian?
Other than the fact that there was no controlled use of fire back
then, no humans and no pigs, either? Absolutely nothing.
Does burning pig nests look to you as a controlled use of fire?
For
controlled use of fire you need to have hearth, firepit.
Again, very superficial thinking.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 100:49:27 |
Calls: | 6,767 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,295 |
Messages: | 5,376,432 |
Posted today: | 1 |