• Lee Berger: Square Peg; Round Hole

    From James McGinn@21:1/5 to Pandora on Wed Jun 7 07:35:43 2023
    On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 6:44:37 AM UTC-7, Pandora wrote:
    Burials and engravings in a small-brained hominin, Homo naledi, from
    the late Pleistocene: contexts and evolutionary implications

    Abstract

    Data from recent explorations in the Dinaledi subsystem illustrates
    one of the earliest examples of a mortuary practice in hominins and
    offers the earliest evidence of multiple interments and funerary
    actions, as well as evidence of the early creation of meaning making
    by a hominin.

    I think Lee Berger is trying to force a square peg into a round hole on this one. He refers to this as, "data." Clearly it is an interpretation of data. Aspects of this data are consistent with mortuary practices but other aspects are not.

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.
    Claudius Denk / Humane Revolution
    How Hominids Actually Evolved:
    https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to James McGinn on Thu Jun 8 19:40:48 2023
    James McGinn wrote:

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.

    There's lots of interpretations.

    One is that humans might've utilized the caves for tens of
    thousands of years.

    They are known to have been explored since at least the 1960s.

    If fury cave monkeys were in there, and the stuff about the
    fires is true, it sounds more like someone was burning them
    out... possibly driving them in deeper in the process.

    Most mammals find it difficult to breath smoke.

    The fires, as described, were everywhere. In the passages, not
    just the caverns.

    This idea that no modern human noticed the caves much less
    entered them for thousands of years sounds ridiculous.

    And Lee Berger is NOT a tiny man. If he could get in there then
    why not San or anyone else?

    The problem isn't coming up with alternative explanations, the
    problem is sifting through the bull.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/archive

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James McGinn@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Sun Jun 11 21:05:58 2023
    On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    James McGinn wrote:

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.

    One is that humans might've utilized the caves for tens of
    thousands of years.

    Seems reasonable. Especially considering that they often found themselves under siege, according to my theory.

    I think this also goes a long way toward explaining why the fossil assemblages show such a stark absence of other species.
    In Berger's most recent video he puts a lot of emphasis on why this is so unusual.

    Lee Berger's interpretations are limited by the standard assumptions of PA which would involve these early hominids being much more transitory than my model suggests, which is consistent with them being highly communal and situated at locations that have
    water and available food resources year round.

    This idea that no modern human noticed the caves much less
    entered them for thousands of years sounds ridiculous.

    I think they would have been abandoned as they became more sophisticated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James McGinn@21:1/5 to James McGinn on Thu Aug 24 17:03:52 2023
    On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 9:06:00 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
    On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    James McGinn wrote:

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.
    One is that humans might've utilized the caves for tens of
    thousands of years.
    Seems reasonable. Especially considering that they often found themselves under siege, according to my theory.

    I think this also goes a long way toward explaining why the fossil assemblages show such a stark absence of other species.
    In Berger's most recent video he puts a lot of emphasis on why this is so unusual.

    Lee Berger's interpretations are limited by the standard assumptions of PA which would involve these early hominids being much more transitory than my model suggests, which is consistent with them being highly communal and situated at locations that
    have water and available food resources year round.
    This idea that no modern human noticed the caves much less
    entered them for thousands of years sounds ridiculous.
    I think they would have been abandoned as they became more sophisticated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James McGinn@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Tue Sep 26 18:23:49 2023
    On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    James McGinn wrote:

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.
    There's lots of interpretations.

    One is that humans might've utilized the caves for tens of
    thousands of years.

    They are known to have been explored since at least the 1960s.

    If fury cave monkeys were in there, and the stuff about the
    fires is true, it sounds more like someone was burning them
    out... possibly driving them in deeper in the process.

    Most mammals find it difficult to breath smoke.

    The fires, as described, were everywhere. In the passages, not
    just the caverns.

    This idea that no modern human noticed the caves much less
    entered them for thousands of years sounds ridiculous.

    And Lee Berger is NOT a tiny man. If he could get in there then
    why not San or anyone else?

    The problem isn't coming up with alternative explanations, the
    problem is sifting through the bull.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/archive

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James McGinn@21:1/5 to James McGinn on Sat Oct 21 13:31:27 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 6:23:51 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
    On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 7:40:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    James McGinn wrote:

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.
    There's lots of interpretations.

    One is that humans might've utilized the caves for tens of
    thousands of years.

    They are known to have been explored since at least the 1960s.

    If fury cave monkeys were in there, and the stuff about the
    fires is true, it sounds more like someone was burning them
    out... possibly driving them in deeper in the process.

    Most mammals find it difficult to breath smoke.

    The fires, as described, were everywhere. In the passages, not
    just the caverns.

    This idea that no modern human noticed the caves much less
    entered them for thousands of years sounds ridiculous.

    And Lee Berger is NOT a tiny man. If he could get in there then
    why not San or anyone else?

    The problem isn't coming up with alternative explanations, the
    problem is sifting through the bull.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/archive

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James McGinn@21:1/5 to James McGinn on Sun Nov 26 11:44:24 2023
    On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 7:35:44 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 6:44:37 AM UTC-7, Pandora wrote:
    Burials and engravings in a small-brained hominin, Homo naledi, from
    the late Pleistocene: contexts and evolutionary implications

    Abstract

    Data from recent explorations in the Dinaledi subsystem illustrates
    one of the earliest examples of a mortuary practice in hominins and
    offers the earliest evidence of multiple interments and funerary
    actions, as well as evidence of the early creation of meaning making
    by a hominin.

    I think Lee Berger is trying to force a square peg into a round hole on this one. He refers to this as, "data." Clearly it is an interpretation of data. Aspects of this data are consistent with mortuary practices but other aspects are not.

    A better interpretation, in my opinion, starts with realization that hominid communities often found themselves under siege during the depth of the dry season. Accordingly, the fossils found would have entered the caves in a state of extreme
    desperation as the rest of their community was massacred then they either couldn't get out or died of thirst waiting for the predators to leave the area.
    Claudius Denk / Humane Revolution
    How Hominids Actually Evolved:
    https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc Verhaegen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 27 02:31:04 2023
    PA paper:
    "Burials and engravings in a small-brained hominin, Homo naledi, from the late Pleistocene:
    contexts and evolutionary implications"
    Data from recent explorations in the Dinaledi subsystem
    - illustrates one of the earliest examples of a mortuary practice in hominins, - offers the earliest evidence of multiple interments & funerary actions
    + evidence of the early creation of meaning making by a hominin.


    :-DDD
    Natural fossilisation!
    Besides, naledi was an australopith, it has 0 to do with Homo.
    Many PAs are still Afrocentrically biased, they see everywhere "human ancestors" (preferably running after antelopes... :-D), never fossil relatives of chimps or bonobos or gorillas... :-D

    Ape+human evolution, google e.g.
    "GondwanaTalks Verhaegen English".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)