Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus
Abstract
The naming of Australopithecus africanus in 1925, based on the Taung
Child, heralded a new era in human evolutionary studies and turned the attention of the then Eurasian-centric palaeoanthropologists to
Africa, albeit with reluctance. Almost one hundred years later, Africa
is recognized as the cradle of humanity, where the entire evolutionary history of our lineage prior to two million years ago took placeé fter
the Homoé³³an split.
Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus
The naming of Australopithecus africanus in 1925, based on the Taung
Child, heralded a new era in human evolutionary studies and turned the attention of the then Eurasian-centric palaeoanthropologists to
Africa, albeit with reluctance. Almost one hundred years later, Africa
is recognized as the cradle of humanity, where the entire evolutionary history of our lineage prior to two million years ago took place
Pandora wrote:
Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus
The naming of Australopithecus africanus in 1925, based on the Taung Child, heralded a new era in human evolutionary studies and turned the attention of the then Eurasian-centric palaeoanthropologists to
Africa, albeit with reluctance. Almost one hundred years later, Africa
is recognized as the cradle of humanity, where the entire evolutionary history of our lineage prior to two million years ago took placeé fter the Homoé³³an split.
What you just did here is pinned all your hopes on Australopithecus
being a human ancestor. If it's not, nothing you are claiming here is
even close to accurate.
What's interesting is that for the longest time Australopithecus was
NOT considered an ancestor. And it in all but complete certainty it was
not. It appears AFTER the split and it appears to reside on the Pan
side of the divide, not the human side.
The human hand, for example, is the least derived! The LCA had a
hand that looked like Homo. And the LCA was bipedal. And the LCA
arose from -- descended from -- a group that split from the mother
waterside population, pushed inland and adapted.
The good Doctor's model where they became Chimps is actually
quite logical. If it weren't them precisely, it was something that
looked very much like them...
Personally I see them having radiated out, taken to diverse
environments, including the forests. But the evolution of the
forest group was moderated by interbreeding with other
populations. Eventually though, their siblings on the savanna
and other environments were wiped out, and the forest
adaptations took over.
I think the good Doctor places all this around 5 million years ago
while I say 3.7 million years...
Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus
The naming of Australopithecus africanus in 1925, based on the Taung
Child, heralded a new era in human evolutionary studies and turned the
attention of the then Eurasian-centric palaeoanthropologists to
Africa, albeit with reluctance. Almost one hundred years later, Africa
is recognized as the cradle of humanity, where the entire evolutionary
history of our lineage prior to two million years ago took place
:-DDD
Ridiculous anthropocentric prejudices:
Reappraising the palaeobiology of Australopithecus
The naming of Australopithecus africanus in 1925, based on the Taung
Child, heralded a new era in human evolutionary studies and turned the
attention of the then Eurasian-centric palaeoanthropologists to
Africa, albeit with reluctance. Almost one hundred years later, Africa
is recognized as the cradle of humanity, where the entire evolutionary
history of our lineage prior to two million years ago took place
:-DDD Ridiculous anthropocentric prejudices:
And yet it appears in one of the oldest and most prestigious
scientific periodicals, Nature. Wow!
You must have lost all faith in the scientific community.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
It involved the entire globe.
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
STOP acting like a fraud,
Op maandag 8 mei 2023 om 12:46:16 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:
netloon:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
It involved the entire globe.
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/716345593177489408
Yes, I don't know whether the Zanclean mega-flood 5.33 Ma (mill.yrs ago) also opened the Red Sea into the Gulf (Francesca Mansfield), but if so, it could perfectly explain why Homo & Pan split c 5 Ma, see my 2022 book p.299-300:
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Primum Sapienti wrote:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
It involved the entire globe.
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
STOP acting like a fraud,
The Red Sea has its beginnings in the Eocene.
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
It involved the entire globe.
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
STOP acting like a fraud,
Stop being an idiot.
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
STOP acting like a fraud,
Stop being
The Red Sea has its beginnings
Primum Sapienti wrote:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
It involved the entire globe.
Do the Google on: Zanclean flood +"red sea"
STOP acting like a fraud,
Primum Sapienti wrote:
Nice review.
Why?
I'm interested in human origins. This doesn't seem relevant.
"the palaeobiology of Australopithecus"
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
"The Zanclean flood occurred when the Strait of Gibraltar opened."
"Red Sea" not mentioned.
Primum Sapienti wrote:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
Me: These events are global. The implications can't be
limited to the local area. They're too huge.
You: "See, it happened & stuff so yuz wrong."
kudu runner:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
"The Zanclean flood occurred when the Strait of Gibraltar opened."
"Red Sea" not mentioned.
Sigh: again:
You: No evidence.
snorkel nose wrote:
kudu runner:
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
"The Zanclean flood occurred when the Strait of Gibraltar opened."
"Red Sea" not mentioned.
Sigh: again:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
Red Sea is NOT mentioned, child.
Op zondag 2 juli 2023 om 07:08:00 UTC+2 schreef Primum Sapienti:
snorkel nose wrote:
kudu runner:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
The Zanclean flood involved the Straits of Gibraltar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
"The Zanclean flood occurred when the Strait of Gibraltar opened."
"Red Sea" not mentioned.
Sigh: again:
Red Sea is NOT mentioned, child.
:-DDD
You're crazy: again:
Sigh: again:
Red Sea not mentioned.
Yes, again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanclean_flood
Red Sea not mentioned. It has no relevance in that event.
2) But whether the Red Sea opened exactly 5.55 Ma (Zanclean flood) or somewhere between 6 & 5 Ma, is unimportant to my scenario:...
sorry, I meant 5.33 Ma, of courseand even more sorry (becoming old?):
2) But whether the Red Sea opened exactly 5.55 Ma (Zanclean flood) or somewhere between 6 & 5 Ma, is unimportant to my scenario:...
and even more sorry (becoming old?):
I wrote "IOW, only
littor...@gmail.com wrote:
and even more sorry (becoming old?):
I wrote "IOW, only
Stop worrying about it.
The word for today is: Disarticulated.
The kudu runners, as you so lovingly refer to them as, are "Disarticulated" in their position and their thinking.
Aquatic Ape, you -- the good Doctor -- present a cohesive model, one that
not only how key events (and adaptations) happened but WHY they
happened.
But your kudu runners don't have that. They can't think in those terms.
They see and think and "Argue" in disarticulated pieces. So they think
if they obsess over a detail here or a claim there they can take down
the whole house.
They're morons.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 100:53:32 |
Calls: | 6,767 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,295 |
Messages: | 5,376,432 |
Posted today: | 1 |