• In Naledi the fossils are all hominid

    From James McGinn@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Thu Apr 13 17:57:28 2023
    On Thursday, April 13, 2023 at 11:26:20 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    kudu runner:
    Caves would have been a very important part of a community's larger strategy
    :-DDD

    Most cave findings are simply fossil accumulations of animals that died in rivers etc.

    In Naledi the fossils are all hominid (that alone calls out for explanation, why so few other species?). and it seems they all went into the caves deliberately and possibly, I speculate, under conditions of desperation (ie. escaping a predatory massacre).
    They may even have hurt themselves getting in. The layout of the bones suggests they died there rather than having been disposed of or ritualistically buried in the cave. I think they went in there, couldn't get out, and starved to death.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 15 07:18:14 2023
    kudu runner:
    Caves would have been a very important part of a community's larger strategy

    :-DDD Most cave findings are simply fossil accumulations of animals that died in rivers etc.

    In Naledi the fossils are all hominid

    Of course: Hominoidea were waterside, forgot?? https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
    Why don't these kudu runners inform a little bit before talking??

    (that alone calls out for explanation, why so few other species?). and it seems they all went into the caves deliberately and possibly, I speculate, under conditions of desperation ...

    :-DDD Like you?
    You kudu runners become more+more senile.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sat Apr 15 08:43:03 2023
    On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 7:18:16 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    kudu runner:
    Caves would have been a very important part of a community's larger strategy

    :-DDD Most cave findings are simply fossil accumulations of animals that died in rivers etc.

    In Naledi the fossils are all hominid
    Of course: Hominoidea were waterside, forgot??

    Uh, during the dry season all/many species were waterside, moron.

    I can only think of two reasons why we would find the fossils of multiple hominids in these caves and an absence of other species, and the latter is more likely in my opinion. Either they occupied those caves frequently and removed carcasses of other
    species or, more likely, they went in there as a desperate measure to escape predators (and then were unable to get out).

    Claudius Denk / Genius

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 16 11:36:50 2023
    kudu runner:

    I can only think of two reasons why we would find the fossils of multiple hominids in these caves and an absence of other species, and the latter is more likely in my opinion. Either they occupied those caves frequently and removed carcasses of other
    species or, more likely, they went in there as a desperate measure to escape predators (and then were unable to get out).

    :-DDD
    Already caught your antelope, my little boy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)