kudu runner's *only* argument:
Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.:-DDD https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 10:45:44 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
kudu runner's *only* argument:
Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.:-DDD https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
How Human actually evolved:
https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
typical kudu runner's "argument":
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.:-DDD
On Wednesday, April 12, 2023 at 1:46:13 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
typical kudu runner's "argument":
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.:-DDD
On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 3:26:18 PM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
On Wednesday, April 12, 2023 at 1:46:13 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
typical kudu runner's "argument":
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.:-DDD
Op woensdag 26 april 2023 om 16:18:44 UTC+2 schreef James McGinn:
On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 3:26:18 PM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
On Wednesday, April 12, 2023 at 1:46:13 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
typical kudu runner's "argument":
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.:-DDD
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna".
Egocentric nonsense, of course (who prefers to find a gorilla ancestor rather than a human ancestor??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): most likely Pliocene Homo followed S.Asian coasts.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea ("apes") were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP.
-- Early Homo is found as far as Java (H.erectus) & even Flores (18 km oversea).
-- Etc.
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense.
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 8:40:03 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna".
Egocentric nonsense, of course (who prefers to find a gorilla ancestor rather than a human ancestor??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): most likely Pliocene Homo followed S.Asian coasts.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea ("apes") were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP.
-- Early Homo is found as far as Java (H.erectus) & even Flores (18 km oversea).
-- Etc.
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense.
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Op vrijdag 28 april 2023 om 18:22:21 UTC+2 schreef Claudius Denk:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 8:40:03 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna".
Egocentric nonsense, of course (who prefers to find a gorilla ancestor rather than a human ancestor??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): most likely Pliocene Homo followed S.Asian coasts.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea ("apes") were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP.
-- Early Homo is found as far as Java (H.erectus) & even Flores (18 km oversea).
-- Etc.
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense.
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
Thanks for agreeing...Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Op dinsdag 2 mei 2023 om 20:10:46 UTC+2 schreef James McGinn:
??
Thanks for agreeing:
Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna". Egocentric nonsense, of course (but which fossil hunter prefers to find a fossil Gorilla ancestor rather than a fossil Homo??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): Pliocene Homo simply followed S.Asian coasts, evt. as far as Java, Flores etc.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP.
-- Etc.
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense (late-Miocene: out of Red Sea?).
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = incredible nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
5) Hunting ancestors = nonsense.
6) Endurance running = stupid nonsense:
we evolved from Mio-Pliocene wading-climbing Hominoidea to early-Pleistocene molluscivorous archaic Homo:
early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna". Egocentric nonsense, of course (but which fossil hunter prefers to find a fossil Gorilla ancestor rather than a fossil Homo??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): Pliocene Homo simply followed S.Asian coasts, evt. as far as Java, Flores etc.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP. ...
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense (late-Miocene: out of Red Sea?).
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = incredible nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
5) Hunting ancestors = nonsense.
6) Endurance running = stupid nonsense:
we evolved from Mio-Pliocene wading-climbing Hominoidea to early-Pleistocene molluscivorous archaic Homo:
early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
Op woensdag 17 mei 2023 om 19:52:25 UTC+2 schreef James McGinn:
Thanks for agreeing, James! :-)Traditional PAs short-sightedly "reasoned" illogically like this:
"Pan & Gorilla are African, quadrupedal & forest-dwelling, but Homo is bipedal on the ground,
"hence" we became BP when we left the forest for (in Africa!) the savanna".
Egocentric nonsense, of course (but which fossil hunter prefers to find a fossil Gorilla ancestor rather than a fossil Homo??):
-- Plio-Pleistocene "hominin" fossils in Africa (although BP -- but *all* early apes were BP, google "aquarboreal") much more resemble Pan or Gorilla than Homo (e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers).
-- Our Pliocene ancestors were not even in Africa (e.g. H.sapiens lacks Pliocene African retrovirus, see Benveniste 1976, Yohn 2005): Pliocene Homo simply followed S.Asian coasts, evt. as far as Java, Flores etc.
-- Early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP (in swamp forests, google "aquarboreal") -- not only humans but also gibbons & siamangs are still BP. ...
1) Out-of-Africa = nonsense (late-Miocene: out of Red Sea?).
2) Human apith ancestors = nonsense.
3) Savanna evolution = incredible nonsense.
4) BP "hominin" = nonsense.
5) Hunting ancestors = nonsense.
6) Endurance running = stupid nonsense:
we evolved from Mio-Pliocene wading-climbing Hominoidea to early-Pleistocene molluscivorous archaic Homo:
early-Miocene Hominoidea were already BP, google "aquarboreal".
We've *always* been waterside, since the Miocene, never savanna, e.g. https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 10:45:44 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
kudu runner's *only* argument:
Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.:-DDD https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
How Human actually evolved:
https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
Savanna believer:
:-DDDThere's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 3:01:46 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
Savanna believer:There is no savanna in my scenario, moron.
:-DDDThere's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
There is no savanna in my scenario, moron.
somebody:
:-D Why did you think that??There is no savanna in my scenario, moron.
There is no savanna in my scenario, moron.
:-D Why did you think that??
Why do I think that? Because of the unrelenting dimwittedness of your responses both now and over the years. This is why I think you are a moron? Any more questions, moron?
On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 10:45:44 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
kudu runner's *only* argument:
Fuck you. Answer the fucking question, asshole.:-DDD https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
There's no running after Kudu in my scenario, you dishonest piece of shit.
How Human actually evolved:
https://youtu.be/Z7TwiVul7F0
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 99:12:27 |
| Calls: | 6,767 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 12,295 |
| Messages: | 5,376,405 |
| Posted today: | 1 |