• Re: Short toes do not appear to be a walking adaptation

    From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 9 10:44:31 2023
    Op zondag 9 april 2023 om 19:35:47 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:
    https://lawnchairanthropology.com/category/embryology/

    The short & sweet is that walking came FIRST, predating
    Homo, and it seems to have done just fine with the long
    toes. This suggests that walking was not applying selective
    pressure on toe length.
    The good Doctor scores another point!
    He's right in savanna idiocy does not explain our shorter
    toes.

    :-)
    What astonishes me is that the kudu runners remain so short-sighted:
    it's really not so difficult in principle: very very (bio)logical: schematically:
    -Mio-Pliocene Hominoidea bipedal=aquarboreal in swamp forests along the Ind.Ocean etc. (eating what exactly??),
    -early-Pleist."archaic"Homo shallow-diving for shellfish again along the Ind.Ocean: stone tools, pachyosteosclerosis etc.
    https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 9 10:35:46 2023
    https://lawnchairanthropology.com/category/embryology/

    The short & sweet is that walking came FIRST, predating
    Homo, and it seems to have done just fine with the long
    toes. This suggests that walking was not applying selective
    pressure on toe length.

    The good Doctor scores another point!

    He's right in savanna idiocy does not explain our shorter
    toes.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/714144806246465536

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)