• Hey! They almost got it right!

    From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 21 20:35:12 2023
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9505798/

    The rift valley is EXACTLY where we'd expect to find
    an "Aquatic Ape" ancestor. He had an outlet to the
    sea. So, there's a freshwater outlet for a coastal
    population to follow inland...

    *This* is the model!

    No, there wasn't ONLY an "Aquatic Ape" population, but
    the Aquatic Ape population was the ONLY ancestor
    common to all so called "Modern" humans!

    The lived on the coast, consuming resources, moving
    on when the immediate food supply was exhausted or
    at least growing thin. Occasionally they pushed inland.
    Conflict, natural disaster, running from threats... "Climate
    Change."

    Depending on WHEN they pushed inland they became
    Lucy or Denisovans... whatever...

    It started long before Lucy, continued long after Denisovans
    popped up. The Americas, it is now understood, were first
    settled by way of COASTAL DISPERSAL: Groups following
    the coast, exploiting marine resources and eventually
    pushing inland. Just. As. Our. Ancestors. Had. Always. Done.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/712178904209702912

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Wed Mar 22 10:52:30 2023
    On Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 8:35:13 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9505798/

    The rift valley is EXACTLY where we'd expect to find
    an "Aquatic Ape" ancestor. He had an outlet to the
    sea. So, there's a freshwater outlet for a coastal
    population to follow inland...

    *This* is the model!

    No, there wasn't ONLY an "Aquatic Ape" population, but
    the Aquatic Ape population was the ONLY ancestor
    common to all so called "Modern" humans!

    The lived on the coast, consuming resources, moving
    on when the immediate food supply was exhausted or
    at least growing thin. Occasionally they pushed inland.
    Conflict, natural disaster, running from threats... "Climate
    Change."

    Depending on WHEN they pushed inland they became
    Lucy or Denisovans... whatever...

    It started long before Lucy, continued long after Denisovans
    popped up. The Americas, it is now understood, were first
    settled by way of COASTAL DISPERSAL: Groups following
    the coast, exploiting marine resources and eventually
    pushing inland. Just. As. Our. Ancestors. Had. Always. Done.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/712178904209702912

    Explain how you aquatic morons managed to not notice that humans aren't aquatic?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Claudius Denk on Wed Mar 22 14:38:48 2023
    , Claudius Denk wrote:

    Explain how you aquatic morons managed to not notice that humans aren't aquatic?

    It's simple. The brain trust, fresh from winning it's eighteenth Nobel Prize, hears "Aquatic Ape" and imagines "Sea Monkeys." And being little more
    than children, at least intellectually, no amount of explanation, of further details or evidence can ever shake them from their error.

    You know, exactly as you are demonstrating here...





    -- --

    https://filmfreeway.com/BostonsScreamingOstrichFilmFestival

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Sat Mar 25 12:51:28 2023
    On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 2:38:49 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    , Claudius Denk wrote:

    Explain how you aquatic morons managed to not notice that humans aren't aquatic?
    It's simple. The brain trust, fresh from winning it's eighteenth Nobel Prize,
    hears "Aquatic Ape" and imagines "Sea Monkeys." And being little more
    than children, at least intellectually, no amount of explanation, of further details or evidence can ever shake them from their error.

    You know, exactly as you are demonstrating here...

    You fucking retards have a aquatic hypothesis for the emergence of a non-aquatic species.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Claudius Denk on Sun Mar 26 03:05:34 2023
    Claudius Denk wrote:

    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    It's simple. The brain trust, fresh from winning it's eighteenth Nobel Prize,
    hears "Aquatic Ape" and imagines "Sea Monkeys." And being little more
    than children, at least intellectually, no amount of explanation, of further
    details or evidence can ever shake them from their error.

    You know, exactly as you are demonstrating here...

    You fucking retards have a

    I wasn't kidding. Morons honestly hear "Aquatic Ape" and think "Sea Monkeys," as you depict here. This is not an argument, and neither is it a sign of intelligence.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/712789255901069312

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 26 03:20:55 2023
    ...

    I wasn't kidding. Morons honestly hear "Aquatic Ape" and think "Sea Monkeys," as you depict here. This is not an argument, and neither is it a sign of intelligence.

    Don't waste your time with these morons, JTEM!
    Let them run after their kudus... :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Mar 26 10:10:28 2023
    On Sunday, March 26, 2023 at 3:20:56 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
    I wasn't kidding. Morons honestly hear "Aquatic Ape" and think "Sea Monkeys,"
    as you depict here. This is not an argument, and neither is it a sign of intelligence.
    Don't waste your time with these morons, JTEM!
    Let them run after their kudus... :-D

    Fuck you, you dishonest piece of shit. I'm the one that pointed out how bad is the savannah ape hypothesis, not you. Your aquatic ape speculations are many times more stupid than the traiditional savanna ape hypothesis. Marc, you are a liar and a
    loser. The only tactic you got left is to misrepresent me as a savanna theorist when you know full well that this isn't even remotely true

    Fuck you, asshole.

    CD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 28 21:52:40 2023
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417583/

    Int J Tryptophan Res. 2017; 10: 1178646917704661.
    Published online 2017 May 2. doi: 10.1177/1178646917704661

    Meat and Nicotinamide: A Causal Role in Human Evolution,
    History, and Demographics

    Abstract
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and
    human evolution. A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains. This culminated in the 3-million-year evolution
    of Homo sapiens and our overall demographic success. We
    view human evolution, recent history, and agricultural
    and demographic transitions in the light of meat and
    nicotinamide intake. A biochemical and immunological
    switch is highlighted that affects fertility in the
    ‘de novo’ tryptophan-to-kynurenine-nicotinamide ‘immune
    tolerance’ pathway. Longevity relates to nicotinamide
    adenine dinucleotide consumer pathways. High meat intake
    correlates with moderate fertility, high intelligence,
    good health, and longevity with consequent population
    stability, whereas low meat/high cereal intake (short
    of starvation) correlates with high fertility, disease,
    and population booms and busts. Too high a meat intake
    and fertility falls below replacement levels. Reducing
    variances in meat consumption might help stabilise
    population growth and improve human capital.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Tue Mar 28 21:21:13 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Abstract
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and
    human evolution.

    This is called "Circular Reasoning." They begin with their conclusion while
    in real science -- and life in general -- you are suppose to be led to or "Arrive
    at" your conclusion.

    A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains.

    Lol!

    And here I am, positing Aquatic Ape and a focus on shellfish, when
    shellfish has no... oops, sorry, my bad; plenty of B3.

    But what you CAN get from that Aquatic Ape diet and DON'T get
    chasing after antelope is DHA.

    So NOTHING missing from the Aquatic Ape diet, TONS missing from
    the savanna idiocy diet...





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/713001423881797632

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 29 04:49:30 2023
    Op woensdag 29 maart 2023 om 06:21:15 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    kudu runner: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417583/
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and human evolution.
    A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains.

    This is called "Circular Reasoning." They begin with their conclusion while in real science -- and life in general -- you are suppose to be led to or "Arrive
    at" your conclusion.
    Lol!
    And here I am, positing Aquatic Ape and a focus on shellfish, when
    shellfish has no... oops, sorry, my bad; plenty of B3.
    But what you CAN get from that Aquatic Ape diet and DON'T get
    chasing after antelope is DHA.
    So NOTHING missing from the Aquatic Ape diet, TONS missing from
    the savanna idiocy diet...

    Thanks, JTEM, of course.
    (But they'll never learn: didn't they eat enough DHA?)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 29 10:54:02 2023
    Claudius Denk / Genius

    :-DDD

    All this kudu runner knows is
    - Fuck you, you dishonest piece of shit.
    - you fucking moron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Wed Mar 29 10:42:37 2023
    On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 9:21:15 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Abstract
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and
    human evolution.
    This is called "Circular Reasoning." They begin with their conclusion while in real science -- and life in general -- you are suppose to be led to or "Arrive
    at" your conclusion.
    A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains.
    Lol!

    And here I am, positing Aquatic Ape and a focus on shellfish, when
    shellfish has no... oops, sorry, my bad; plenty of B3.

    But what you CAN get from that Aquatic Ape diet and DON'T get
    chasing after antelope is DHA.

    So NOTHING missing from the Aquatic Ape diet, TONS missing from
    the savanna idiocy diet...

    Lot's of species eat this diet, you fucking moron. They didn't develop intellect, complex language and culture, consciousness. You loons describe the diet of an otter and declare victory.

    None of you has the slightest understanding of how to evaluate evidence OBJECTIVELY!!!!.

    Claudius Denk / Genius

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Claudius Denk on Wed Mar 29 14:58:07 2023
    Claudius Denk wrote:

    Lot's of species eat this diet, you fucking moron.

    Speaking of fucking morons...

    What percentage of the human brain is DHA? Where did it come from?

    How did we evolve this dependence on DHA consuming a diet with
    little or even no DHA what so ever?

    The current claims, from the folks who believe in molecular dating,
    place the mutation that allows us to synthesize DHA as well as we do,
    and don't do it well at all, is on the order of 80k years old. This is according to the same status quo that rejects reality oops I meant
    they reject Aquatic Ape.

    So where did the DHA come from?





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/713001423881797632

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Solving Tornadoes@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Thu Mar 30 09:23:52 2023
    On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 2:58:09 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Claudius Denk wrote:

    Lot's of species eat this diet, you fucking moron.
    Speaking of fucking morons...

    What percentage of the human brain is DHA?

    Hundreds of species have a diet rich in DHA. Only hominids have large brains. Only hominids have complex language, thought, culture. etc. Only hominids reside in large communities. ONLY HOMINIDS!!! Why the fuck is there no parralel evolution from the
    hundreds of other species that regularly eat a lot more DHA than do humans?

    You got nothing, you fucking convoluted moron.

    You idiots have no business in a scientific discussion.

    How did we evolve this dependence on DHA consuming a diet with
    little or even no DHA what so ever?

    No such dependence exists except in your dull-witted imagination.

    You idiots got nothing!!!

    James McGinn / Genius

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 30 11:08:49 2023
    Op woensdag 29 maart 2023 om 23:58:09 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    netloon:
    Lot's of species eat this diet, you fucking moron.

    Speaking of fucking morons...
    What percentage of the human brain is DHA? Where did it come from?
    How did we evolve this dependence on DHA consuming a diet with
    little or even no DHA what so ever?
    The current claims, from the folks who believe in molecular dating,
    place the mutation that allows us to synthesize DHA as well as we do,
    and don't do it well at all, is on the order of 80k years old. This is according to the same status quo that rejects reality oops I meant
    they reject Aquatic Ape.
    So where did the DHA come from?

    These netloons don't know, JTEM,
    they have no answer, they have 0:
    they don't know where we got our DHA, why we evolved very large brains, became vertical, colonized islands, spread world-wide in short time etc.etc.
    although the answers are not difficult, google e.g. "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Thu Mar 30 11:20:20 2023
    On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:08:50 AM UTC-7, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Op woensdag 29 maart 2023 om 23:58:09 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    netloon:
    Lot's of species eat this diet, you fucking moron.

    Speaking of fucking morons...
    What percentage of the human brain is DHA? Where did it come from?

    Answer my question, you evasive piece of shit. Explain why the hundreds of DHA consuming species didn't develop hominid/human evolution?

    Answer my question, you evasive twit.

    Claudius Denk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 30 19:08:58 2023
    Claudius Denk wrote:

    [---pointless---]

    Now our brains are dependent upon DHA. Supposedly the mutation
    that allows us to synthesize it -- and this is something we are not
    great at even with the mutation -- is only about 80k years old. So,
    do modern humans only date back 80k years? If not, where did the
    DHA come from before that?

    It's a simple question. If you want to "Argue" a human origins
    absent Aquatic Ape, you need to explain where the DHA was
    coming from. This is not optional. You are required to do this else
    you have no model. You have no hypothesis. All you're doing is
    ranting incoherently... emotionally.






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/Neanderthals

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Claudius Denk@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Thu Mar 30 21:16:55 2023
    On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 7:08:59 PM UTC-7, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Claudius Denk wrote:

    [---pointless---]

    Now our brains are dependent upon DHA.

    So, let me get this straight, your theory is that humans--for no known reason--suddenly became dependent on DHA. And this dependency underlies the emergence of all hominid intellectual, social, and cultural behaviors/adaptations? All because of DHA.
    Right?

    Supposedly the mutation
    that allows us to synthesize it -- and this is something we are not
    great at even with the mutation -- is only about 80k years old. So,
    do modern humans only date back 80k years? If not, where did the
    DHA come from before that?

    Explain why otter and the hundreds of other species that eat shellfish have not developed this dependency on DHA that you think causes human evolution?

    It's a simple question. If you want to "Argue" a human origins
    absent Aquatic Ape, you need to explain where the DHA was
    coming from.

    Brain growth does not rely on DHA or any one substance, moron.

    Find a new hobby, science ain't your thing.

    Claudius Denk / Genius

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Fri Mar 31 11:42:11 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:

    These netloons don't know, JTEM,
    they have no answer, they have 0:
    they don't know where we got our DHA, why we evolved very large brains

    Apparently they never even thought to Google it. Or read any of the
    threads on the topic... or the replies to their idiocy...

    They're an attention starved troll. Some people are so desperate for attention that negative attention is good enough, and probably the best they can manage given their symptoms.

    They don't care about human origins. They have no interest in science. They're just acting out, seeking negative attention "Just like mom used to give them."



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/712093348746362880

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Fri Apr 7 22:28:36 2023
    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Abstract
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and
    human evolution.

    This is called "Circular Reasoning." They begin with their conclusion while

    THIS must be circular reasoining too then: "Fishing was a critical
    step in all animal and human evolution"


    in real science -- and life in general -- you are suppose to be led to or "Arrive
    at" your conclusion.

    A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains.

    Lol!

    And here I am, positing Aquatic Ape and a focus on shellfish, when
    shellfish has no... oops, sorry, my bad; plenty of B3.

    But what you CAN get from that Aquatic Ape diet and DON'T get
    chasing after antelope is DHA.

    So NOTHING missing from the Aquatic Ape diet, TONS missing from
    the savanna idiocy diet...

    Meat and vegetation


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417583/

    Int J Tryptophan Res. 2017; 10: 1178646917704661.
    Published online 2017 May 2. doi: 10.1177/1178646917704661

    Meat and Nicotinamide: A Causal Role in Human Evolution,
    History, and Demographics

    Abstract
    Hunting for meat was a critical step in all animal and
    human evolution. A key brain-trophic element in meat is
    vitamin B3 / nicotinamide. The supply of meat and
    nicotinamide steadily increased from the Cambrian
    origin of animal predators ratcheting ever larger
    brains. This culminated in the 3-million-year evolution
    of Homo sapiens and our overall demographic success. We
    view human evolution, recent history, and agricultural
    and demographic transitions in the light of meat and
    nicotinamide intake. A biochemical and immunological
    switch is highlighted that affects fertility in the
    ‘de novo’ tryptophan-to-kynurenine-nicotinamide ‘immune
    tolerance’ pathway. Longevity relates to nicotinamide
    adenine dinucleotide consumer pathways. High meat intake
    correlates with moderate fertility, high intelligence,
    good health, and longevity with consequent population
    stability, whereas low meat/high cereal intake (short
    of starvation) correlates with high fertility, disease,
    and population booms and busts. Too high a meat intake
    and fertility falls below replacement levels. Reducing
    variances in meat consumption might help stabilise
    population growth and improve human capital.




    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130603163749.htm

    Most apes eat leaves and fruits from trees and shrubs.
    New studies spearheaded by the University of Utah show
    that human ancestors expanded their menu 3.5 million
    years ago, adding tropical grasses and sedges to an
    ape-like diet and setting the stage for our modern
    diet of grains, grasses, and meat and dairy from
    grazing animals.

    In four new studies of carbon isotopes in fossilized
    tooth enamel from scores of human ancestors and baboons
    in Africa from 4 million to 10,000 years ago, a team
    of two dozen researchers found a surprise increase in
    the consumption of grasses and sedges -- plants that
    resemble grasses and rushes but have stems and
    triangular cross sections.

    "At last, we have a look at 4 million years of the
    dietary evolution of humans and their ancestors," says
    University of Utah geochemist Thure Cerling, principal
    author of two of the four new studies published online
    June 3 by the journal Proceedings of the National
    Academy of Sciences. Most funding was from the
    National Science Foundation.

    "For a long time, primates stuck by the old
    restaurants -- leaves and fruits -- and by 3.5 million
    years ago, they started exploring new diet
    possibilities -- tropical grasses and sedges -- that
    grazing animals discovered a long time before, about
    10 million years ago" when African savanna began
    expanding, Cerling says. "Tropical grasses provided a
    new set of restaurants. We see an increasing reliance
    on this new resource by human ancestors that most
    primates still don't use today."

    Grassy savannas and grassy woodlands in East Africa
    were widespread by 6 million to 7 million years ago. It
    is a major question why human ancestors didn't seriously
    start exploiting savanna grasses until less than 4
    million years ago.


    https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1222568110
    Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana
    Basin hominins

    Abstract
    Hominin fossil evidence in the Turkana Basin in Kenya
    from ca. 4.1 to 1.4 Ma samples two archaic early hominin
    genera and records some of the early evolutionary
    history of Paranthropus and Homo. Stable carbon isotopes
    in fossil tooth enamel are used to estimate the fraction
    of diet derived from C3 or C4 resources in these hominin
    taxa. The earliest hominin species in the Turkana Basin,
    Australopithecus anamensis, derived nearly all of its
    diet from C3 resources. Subsequently, by ca. 3.3 Ma, the
    later Kenyanthropus platyops had a very wide dietary
    range—from virtually a purely C3 resource-based diet to
    one dominated by C4 resources. By ca. 2 Ma, hominins in
    the Turkana Basin had split into two distinct groups:
    specimens attributable to the genus Homo provide evidence
    for a diet with a ca. 65/35 ratio of C3- to C4-based
    resources, whereas P. boisei had a higher fraction of
    C4-based diet (ca. 25/75 ratio). Homo sp. increased the
    fraction of C4-based resources in the diet through ca.
    1.5 Ma, whereas P. boisei maintained its high dependency
    on C4-derived resources.


    That's then evidence, kid. No just so story, no
    hand waving.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Fri Apr 7 22:50:17 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    THIS must be circular reasoining too then: "Fishing was a critical
    step in all animal and human evolution"

    Technically, no, it's not a "Circular" argument it's a "Straw Man" argument.

    The critical step would have been shellfish. Well. maybe scavenging
    any fish marine/mammals that washed up on shore. But definiitely
    shellfish.

    They just picked them up.

    I've course I've explicitly stated this countless times but reading comprehension & retention gets in the way of your trolling, I suppose,
    so you had to kill them off...

    Lol!

    And here I am, positing Aquatic Ape and a focus on shellfish, when shellfish has no... oops, sorry, my bad; plenty of B3.

    But what you CAN get from that Aquatic Ape diet and DON'T get
    chasing after antelope is DHA.

    So NOTHING missing from the Aquatic Ape diet, TONS missing from
    the savanna idiocy diet...

    Meat and vegetation
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417583/

    Still no DHA, and according to one of your own cites, which you can't
    recall it seems, humans have only been able to synthesize DHA as well
    as we do for 80k years... and we're not that good at it.

    Again, just do the Google on the brain and DHA.

    No amount of misunderstanding cites can change any of the facts.






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/713876271508193280

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Tue Aug 1 22:04:40 2023
    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    THIS must be circular reasoining too then: "Fishing was a critical
    step in all animal and human evolution"

    Technically, no, it's not a "Circular" argument it's a "Straw Man" argument.

    That's aa all right.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 2 16:13:16 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    [OCPD]

    You clearly have zero interests in the topic. Which just makes
    you look even more idiotic, with your insistence on replying.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724349278678614016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to JTEM is so reasonable on Fri Aug 11 22:34:29 2023
    JTEM is so reasonable wrote:

    [OCPD]

    Yeah, the FBI has been informed about you... can't take any risks.

    So, anyway, you are a blithering idiot, quoting things you never read,
    much less understood, and that's why you can't answer even basis
    questions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 12 20:46:13 2023
    OCPD, Primum Sapienti wrote:
    [...]

    You clearly pose a threat to the public, with your disorders...

    The Rift Valley is a fantastic example of circular thinking that
    passes for "Science" in paleo anthropology.

    The Rift Valley is exactly where a coastal population, a waterside
    group -- Aquatic Ape -- would wind up, as some members broke
    off, followed the water inland only to adapt and spread...

    It fits Aquatic Ape like a glove, this Rift Valley, and yet you can't
    squeeze it into any stupid Out of Africa purity model.



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/724820386985934848

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Solving Tornadoes on Fri Sep 1 21:02:42 2023
    Solving Tornadoes wrote:

    Hundreds of species have a diet rich in DHA.

    Children can grasp this. Children. But...

    Practice on Bats. Bats alone have evolved powered flight
    amongst mammals.

    Apparently being a mammal wasn't enough. Apparently
    being arboreal s no recipe for powered flight either, as
    there are plenty of arboreal mammals.

    What about their diet? Do you honestly believe that there's
    something unique to bats? Any bats?

    Read up on "Punctuated Equilibrium." Gould.

    Or this guy... what's his name? "Marc Verhaegen." He talks
    about an island habitat... isolation...niche environment...

    Again, basic stuff. Nothing new. There is no prize for having
    it all whiz over your head like you're testifying to.

    Basic stuff.

    High schoolers could understand this. Middle school kids.

    Primary school children.

    But you can't, or so you tell us.



    Have a nice day.

    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/726595683193405440

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)