Free-diver plunges to record depth beneath frozen Swiss lakehospital confirmed there was nothing serious.
14.3.23
Czech freediver David Vencl (40 yrs) dives to 52.1 m under the ice in Sils without a wetsuit in a single breath.
... Vencl dived through a hole in the ice, then retrieved a sticker from a depth of 50 m, to prove his feat before re-emerging through the same hole. He spat some blood, sat down for a minute, then opened a bottle of champagne. A later visit to the
The Swiss plunge in Tps of 1 - 4°C took him 1' 54", his promoter Pavel Kalous said - a bit slower than expected:
"He kind of enjoyed it, but admits he was a little more nervous than usual, and he had some problems with breathing.
There is nothing difficult for him to be in cold water... Lack of oxygen is something normal for him. But this was completely different, because it's really difficult to work with the pressure in your ears in cold water.
If you combine all these 3 things: cold water, lack of oxygen & the problem with working with pressure, it's something very unique."
No kudu there...
hospital confirmed there was nothing serious.Free-diver plunges to record depth beneath frozen Swiss lake
14.3.23
Czech freediver David Vencl (40 yrs) dives to 52.1 m under the ice in Sils without a wetsuit in a single breath.
... Vencl dived through a hole in the ice, then retrieved a sticker from a depth of 50 m, to prove his feat before re-emerging through the same hole. He spat some blood, sat down for a minute, then opened a bottle of champagne. A later visit to the
The Swiss plunge in Tps of 1 - 4°C took him 1' 54", his promoter Pavel Kalous said - a bit slower than expected:
"He kind of enjoyed it, but admits he was a little more nervous than usual, and he had some problems with breathing.
There is nothing difficult for him to be in cold water... Lack of oxygen is something normal for him. But this was completely different, because it's really difficult to work with the pressure in your ears in cold water.
If you combine all these 3 things: cold water, lack of oxygen & the problem with working with pressure, it's something very unique."
No kudu there...
Exceptional performance by trained individuals in extreme
circumstances is not evidence of (past) adaptation.
It's peanuts for those who are: <https://i.natgeofe.com/n/f2bf4ef6-f569-4a27-a84b-b7d6a01b9ac9/under-antarctica-weddell-seal-pup.jpg?w=636&h=423>
Exceptional performance by trained individuals in extreme
circumstances is not evidence of (past) adaptation.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 04:48:55 -0700 (PDT), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:hospital confirmed there was nothing serious.
Free-diver plunges to record depth beneath frozen Swiss lake
14.3.23
Czech freediver David Vencl (40 yrs) dives to 52.1 m under the ice in Sils without a wetsuit in a single breath.
... Vencl dived through a hole in the ice, then retrieved a sticker from a depth of 50 m, to prove his feat before re-emerging through the same hole. He spat some blood, sat down for a minute, then opened a bottle of champagne. A later visit to the
The Swiss plunge in Tps of 1 - 4°C took him 1' 54", his promoter Pavel Kalous said - a bit slower than expected:
"He kind of enjoyed it, but admits he was a little more nervous than usual, and he had some problems with breathing.
There is nothing difficult for him to be in cold water... Lack of oxygen is something normal for him. But this was completely different, because it's really difficult to work with the pressure in your ears in cold water.
If you combine all these 3 things: cold water, lack of oxygen & the problem with working with pressure, it's something very unique."
No kudu there...
Exceptional performance by trained individuals in extreme
circumstances is not evidence of (past) adaptation.
It's peanuts for those who are: <https://i.natgeofe.com/n/f2bf4ef6-f569-4a27-a84b-b7d6a01b9ac9/under-antarctica-weddell-seal-pup.jpg?w=636&h=423>
hospital confirmed there was nothing serious.Free-diver plunges to record depth beneath frozen Swiss lake
14.3.23
Czech freediver David Vencl (40 yrs) dives to 52.1 m under the ice in Sils without a wetsuit in a single breath.
... Vencl dived through a hole in the ice, then retrieved a sticker from a depth of 50 m, to prove his feat before re-emerging through the same hole. He spat some blood, sat down for a minute, then opened a bottle of champagne. A later visit to the
The Swiss plunge in Tps of 1 - 4°C took him 1' 54", his promoter Pavel Kalous said - a bit slower than expected:
"He kind of enjoyed it, but admits he was a little more nervous than usual, and he had some problems with breathing.
There is nothing difficult for him to be in cold water... Lack of oxygen is something normal for him. But this was completely different, because it's really difficult to work with the pressure in your ears in cold water.
If you combine all these 3 things: cold water, lack of oxygen & the problem with working with pressure, it's something very unique."
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
Well as "Coastal Dispersal" and our dependence on DHA proves, we
were a waterside species, and being able to dive would translate
directly to more resources we could exploit.
Compare *That* to jewelry...
Primum Sapienti wrote:
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
Well as "Coastal Dispersal" and our dependence on DHA proves, we
were a waterside species, and being able to dive would translate
directly to more resources we could exploit.
Compare *That* to jewelry...
Op maandag 27 maart 2023 om 06:12:21 UTC+2 schreef Primum Sapienti:
hospital confirmed there was nothing serious.Free-diver plunges to record depth beneath frozen Swiss lake
14.3.23
Czech freediver David Vencl (40 yrs) dives to 52.1 m under the ice in Sils without a wetsuit in a single breath.
... Vencl dived through a hole in the ice, then retrieved a sticker from a depth of 50 m, to prove his feat before re-emerging through the same hole. He spat some blood, sat down for a minute, then opened a bottle of champagne. A later visit to the
The Swiss plunge in Tps of 1 - 4°C took him 1' 54", his promoter Pavel Kalous said - a bit slower than expected:
"He kind of enjoyed it, but admits he was a little more nervous than usual, and he had some problems with breathing.
There is nothing difficult for him to be in cold water... Lack of oxygen is something normal for him. But this was completely different, because it's really difficult to work with the pressure in your ears in cold water.
If you combine all these 3 things: cold water, lack of oxygen & the problem with working with pressure, it's something very unique."
kudu runner:
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
:-DDD
Never eaten DHA-rich oysters/mussels/shrimps/...??
No wonder you're still running after kudus...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSIydke_Nyg
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Primum Sapienti wrote:
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
Well as "Coastal Dispersal" and our dependence on DHA proves, we
were a waterside species, and being able to dive would translate
directly to more resources we could exploit.
Why do you need to dive 50 m deep?
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
Primum Sapienti wrote:
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
Very likely
Primum Sapienti wrote:
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Primum Sapienti wrote:
There is no evolutionary advantage for such diving.
Well as "Coastal Dispersal" and our dependence on DHA proves, we
were a waterside species, and being able to dive would translate
directly to more resources we could exploit.
Why do you need to dive 50 m deep?
I can't claim to taking any measurements
kudu runner:
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Primum Sapienti wrote:
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
Very likely
Why?
So bipedalism arose and only afterwards Chimps evolved, for
sure, and in all probability Gorillas as well.
I would bet on Gorillas, always have, but you're slow to these
concepts, so let's just stick to Chimps..
FIRST bipedalism arose AND THEN LATER Chimps evolved...
The ancestor to Chimps, the LCA was bipedal. Knuckle walking
came later.
So your forest didn't spawn bipedalism, that's where it went to
die. And your savanna was always a joke, which is why you're
pretending that it was never claimed to be the answer...
Primum Sapienti wrote:
JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
Primum Sapienti wrote:
You need to dive 50 m for oysters???? LOL
Very likely
Why?
Like I already said and it never registered in that brick you
call a brain:
: Very likely, some depth at least. During the Interglacial when sea level
: grew and they became trapped on a new island or were stopped from
: migrating to virgin coast and had to exploit more from the stretch of
: beach they had...
:
: Or maybe they just liked oysters. Humans are like that. One of your
What part, exactly, did you fail to grasp?
Perhaps if instead of refering to it as 50 meters, refer to it in
feet: roughly 150 *feet*.
Now, again, why dive *150 feet* for oysters when AA claims
all you need is at the shore?
Primum Sapienti wrote:
Perhaps if instead of refering to it as 50 meters, refer to it in
feet: roughly 150 *feet*.
You're not "Arguing." You're not even being logical.
I put the LCA at 3.7 million years ago. The specific date isn't
that important to me, the underlying point is "More Recent."
The good Doctor might posit any depth he wishes, but the
underlying point is the diving.
Now, again, why dive *150 feet* for oysters when AA claims
all you need is at the shore?
I can answer a third time but t seems that there's little hope
of breeching your condition, making you recognize it, much
less understand...
#1
The glacial/interglacial cycle trapped them and they had to
exploit more of the sea in front of them, instead of merely
picking up their rocks and moving on.
#2.
They were humans and had preferences. Our grazing farm
animals show preferences. They prefer some food sources
over others -- they think they taste better. Humans are worse.
They could have picked a stretch of beach clean of a
preferred food source and took to diving in order to reach
more beneath the water line.
There. That's three times in this one thread alone.There. You've had chance after chance to dream up
I put the LCA at 3.7 million years ago. The specific date isn't
that important to me, the underlying point is "More Recent."
The good Doctor might posit any depth he wishes, but the
underlying point is the diving.
Now, again, why dive *150 feet* for oysters when AA claims
all you need is at the shore?
I can answer a third time but t seems that there's little hope
of breeching your condition, making you recognize it, much
less understand...
#1
The glacial/interglacial cycle trapped them and they had to
exploit more of the sea in front of them, instead of merely
picking up their rocks and moving on.
#2.
They were humans and had preferences. Our grazing farm
animals show preferences. They prefer some food sources
over others -- they think they taste better. Humans are worse.
They could have picked a stretch of beach clean of a
preferred food source and took to diving in order to reach
more beneath the water line.
There. That's three times in this one thread alone.
I'd place the Homo/Pan last commen ancestor 5.33 Ma.
I put the LCA at 3.7 million years ago. The specific date isn't
that important to me, the underlying point is "More Recent."
Based on what?
The good Doctor might posit any depth he wishes, but the
underlying point is the diving.
Hominid A sez, hey, I'm hungry. Let's just dive in the water
and hope we find some food...
Now, again, why dive *150 feet* for oysters when AA claims
all you need is at the shore?
I can answer a third time but t seems that there's little hope
You have not answered *once*
#1
The glacial/interglacial cycle trapped them and they had to
exploit more of the sea in front of them, instead of merely
picking up their rocks and moving on.
#2.
They were humans and had preferences. Our grazing farm
animals show preferences. They prefer some food sources
over others -- they think they taste better. Humans are worse.
They could have picked a stretch of beach clean of a
preferred food source and took to diving in order to reach
more beneath the water line.
WHY dive 50 meters?
Primum Sapienti wrote:
I put the LCA at 3.7 million years ago. The specific date isn'tBased on what?
that important to me, the underlying point is "More Recent."
What answer is capable of piercing your illness?
It's not like I haven't talked about this before... a lot.
Tell me what answering you now will change.
{Crickets}
The good Doctor might posit any depth he wishes, but the
underlying point is the diving.
Hominid A sez, hey, I'm hungry. Let's just dive in the waterSee? All this time where the good Doctor posits that Aquatic
and hope we find some food...
Ape evolved bipedalism; your Hominids!
YOU LITERALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE GOOD DOCTOR'S
POSITION IS!
You have no clue what so ever! You don't know what you're
disagreeing with, all you know is that your disorder is
compelling you to disagree..
Now, again, why dive *150 feet* for oysters when AA claims
all you need is at the shore?
I can answer a third time but t seems that there's little hope
You have not answered *once*And yet here it is, again, quoted by you:
You are disputing the glacial/interglacial cycle? Wow. You're#1
The glacial/interglacial cycle trapped them and they had to
exploit more of the sea in front of them, instead of merely
picking up their rocks and moving on.
a goddamn idiot!
#2.
They were humans and had preferences. Our grazing farm
animals show preferences. They prefer some food sources
over others -- they think they taste better. Humans are worse.
They could have picked a stretch of beach clean of a
preferred food source and took to diving in order to reach
more beneath the water line.
WHY dive 50 meters?: I put the LCA at 3.7 million years ago. The specific date isn't
: that important to me, the underlying point is "More Recent."
:
: The good Doctor might posit any depth he wishes, but the
: underlying point is the diving.
You are an idiot. Certified.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:07:45 |
| Calls: | 6,767 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 12,295 |
| Messages: | 5,376,419 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
