Anthropocentric "anthropologists" are hopeless
From
littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to
All on Wed Mar 15 09:42:23 2023
Pliocene apiths lived closer to the late-Miocene hominid common ancestors: no wonder they had traits of humans Homo & Afr.apes Gorilla & Pan.
Detailed comparisons show (not only my HE papers):
-E.Afr.apiths resemble Gorilla (G>P>H),
-S.Afr.apiths resemble Pan (P>H,G).
Pliocene Homo was in S.Asia->Java H.erectus.
But afro+anthropocentrically biased self-declared anthropologists assume:
(1) humans come from Africa,
humans had chimp-like ancestors,
hence apiths (human+apelike traits) are human ancestors,
(2) in Africa, there are forests & savannas,
apes are not bipedal (BP),
humans are BP on the ground, apes live in forests,
hence apiths (human ancestors ITO) ran over savannas.
Needless to say, these are examples of illogical "logica".
What really happened is not difficult IOO (google "aquarboreal"):
late-Miocene BP hominids were "BP" in Red Sea swamp forests,
-Pliocene Homo followed S.Asian coasts -> Java 2 Ma,
-Pliocene Gorilla // Pan followed E.Afr.Rift swamp forests -> inland.
IOW,
of course, apiths were still +-BP & had some humanlike traits, what else??
But that doesn't make them savanna runners!!
How stupid stupid stupid are some self-declared "anthropologists"!!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)