https://youtu.be/UnGe_Gx0WB8

Two issues:

#1. I have always argued that the "Africans" in the
"Out of Africa" hypothesis are better (more accurately)
grouped with Eurasians than sub Saharan African. So,
they would have spread DNA southwards as they
contacted/interacted with other African populations.

Remember: One of the big lies of the social program
masquerading as science is that all Africans, all people
with dark skin are one and the same. Not only does
Africa have distinct populations today but it would have
been MORE distinct in the past, ANYTIME prior to the
Bantu Expansion which... what? It maybe happened
around the time of the famous King Tut? Perhaps even
a little after... there's wiggle room.

Then look at Melanesians who, as far as i know, as some
of the LEAST Africans of any population, yet idiots see
them and scream "Oh, look! They're black! That makes
them African!"

No, honey, if we can trust the "Science" that gets trickled
down to us, they're less African than Europeans...

#2. The west African archaic probably an African
Neanderthal or "Homo antecessor," with some mixing
with later arrivals.

it was no "Modern" human. I've argued that A00 was
"Acquired" by so called moderns that interbreed with
archaic Homo, perhaps in historic times.

Look. Neanderthal banged everything with a hole,
Denisovans banged everything with a hole, whatever
African group you want to talk about banged everything
with a hole... don't attribute modern views and "Morales"
on the past.

None of these people were hippies. They ate it or
inseminated it... possibly both.

Maybe I'm exaggerating, slightly, and maybe I'm not.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/710425976700649472

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)