• Swimming does not build bone

    From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 12 23:04:56 2023
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jul-19-la-he-swimming-20100719-story.html

    “Swimming does not build bone,” says Dr. Michael Holick,
    an osteoporosis expert at the Boston University School
    of Medicine. “It’s pounding the pavement that is
    translated to hip and spine bone strength. Even
    treadmills and elliptical machines are not the same,” he
    says."


    https://www.bones.nih.gov/health-info/bone/bone-health/exercise/exercise-your-bone-health
    Last Reviewed 2018-10
    ...
    The best bone building exercises
    Weight-bearing and resistance exercises are the best for
    your bones. Weight-bearing exercises force you to work
    against gravity. They include walking, hiking, jogging,
    climbing stairs, playing tennis, and dancing. Resistance
    exercises – such as lifting weights – can also strengthen
    bones. Other exercises such as swimming and bicycling can
    help build and maintain strong muscles and have excellent
    cardiovascular benefits, but they are not the best way to
    exercise your bones.
    ...


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571133/
    Bone mineral density in high-level endurance runners: part
    A—site-specific characteristics
    2021 Sep 12

    Abstract
    Purpose
    Physical activity, particularly mechanical loading that
    results in high-peak force and is multi-directional in
    nature, increases bone mineral density (BMD). In athletes
    such as endurance runners, this association is more complex
    due to other factors such as low energy availability and
    menstrual dysfunction. Moreover, many studies of athletes
    have used small sample sizes and/or athletes of varying
    abilities, making it difficult to compare BMD phenotypes
    between studies.



    etc

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 12 22:11:03 2023
    What the peanut gallery thinks "Aquatic Ape" means:

    https://marswillsendnomore.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/scantastical001.jpg

    What's worse is that I'm not kidding, not in the least.

    What's even worse is that they actually believe that such
    ignorance is a mark of excellence... "I is edu mah cated."



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/709105886430478336

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 13 10:29:04 2023
    Kudu runner:
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jul-19-la-he-swimming-20100719-story.html
    “Swimming does not build bone,” says Dr. Michael Holick,
    an osteoporosis expert at the Boston University School
    of Medicine. “It’s pounding the pavement that is
    translated to hip and spine bone strength. Even
    treadmills and elliptical machines are not the same,” he
    says."

    Our kudu runner doesn't even know that osteoporosis & pachyosteosclerosis (POS) have 0 to do with each other...
    Sigh...

    Not unlikely, POS is also more fragile (too much Ca) than normal bone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 26 22:16:04 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Kudu runner:
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jul-19-la-he-swimming-20100719-story.html
    “Swimming does not build bone,” says Dr. Michael Holick,
    an osteoporosis expert at the Boston University School
    of Medicine. “It’s pounding the pavement that is
    translated to hip and spine bone strength. Even
    treadmills and elliptical machines are not the same,” he
    says."

    Our kudu runner doesn't even know that osteoporosis & pachyosteosclerosis (POS) have 0 to do with each other...
    Sigh...

    Not unlikely, POS is also more fragile (too much Ca) than normal bone.


    Snorkel noser doesn't understand "“It’s pounding the pavement that
    is translated to hip and spine bone strength." making the bone less
    fragile.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Sun Feb 26 22:30:33 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Snorkel noser doesn't understand

    We're always so kind to you, so polite, despite your many obvious
    flaws... your many, many flaws... many, many, many, many flaws...

    Anyhow, we're always so cordial, pretending not to notice the
    drool, never asking about the stains on the front of your pants,
    and yet you return our charity with such rudeness! Did they teach
    you nothing at that trailer park? I mean, nothing besides savanna
    idiocy?






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/710311843910041600

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 27 05:41:08 2023
    Op maandag 27 februari 2023 om 07:30:34 UTC+1 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Snorkel noser doesn't understand

    We're always so kind to you, so polite, despite your many obvious
    flaws... your many, many flaws... many, many, many, many flaws...
    Anyhow, we're always so cordial, pretending not to notice the
    drool, never asking about the stains on the front of your pants,
    and yet you return our charity with such rudeness! Did they teach
    you nothing at that trailer park? I mean, nothing besides savanna
    idiocy?

    I just googled "Michael Holick pachyosteoporosis aquatic evolution":
    0 results...

    It's no difficult: POS is exclusively seen in slow+shallow divers, mostly (or even uniquely? I'm still not sure) in salty water.
    H.erectus was strongly pachy-osteo-sclerotic...

    H.erectus cs reached islands, got brains 2x apes-apiths (DHA), had flat feet (cursorial mammals run on toes or hooves=nails), they had a broad thorax & pelvis (= also lateral arms & leg movements), etc.etc. And than these idiots conclude: our ancestors
    ran after antelopes... :-DDD

    The most difficult question is paleo-anthropology is not how humans evolved, but how some self-declared "scientists" can remain so stupid... the savanna fantasies (losing your fur to run after antelopes under the sun, sweating water + salt ... :-DDD) are
    indeed the most idiotic thoughts thinkable.

    How can they remain so stupid??? Probably they reason "our ancestors lived in Africa, in Africa you have forest & savanna, non-human primates are quadrupedal & live in forests, hence bipedal humans live outside forests = savanna"???
    Their afrocentric dogma is already wrong (e.g. H.erectus on Java), but their reasoning is even worse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Mon Feb 27 22:27:49 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:

    I just googled "Michael Holick pachyosteoporosis aquatic evolution":
    0 results...

    I tried Bing and it returned some images.

    H.erectus cs reached islands, got brains 2x apes-apiths (DHA), had flat feet (cursorial
    mammals run on toes or hooves=nails), they had a broad thorax & pelvis (= also lateral
    arms & leg movements), etc.etc. And than these idiots conclude: our ancestors ran
    after antelopes... :-DDD

    The odd thing is that erectus aligns with estimates -- guess work? -- on the dating for the
    "Modern" human brain and the loss of the baculum. And, according to some sources, the
    chromosome fusion. I've seen a very good argument, indirectly, for erectus being "Modern
    Man," the first of our species.

    ....the claim was that, given our genetics, we've likely been a single species for the
    better part of 2 million years, which aligns perfectly with erectus, ignoring some made
    up crap about an early African erectus.

    If I'm allowed to speculate then try this one on for size:

    Erectus represented something of a genetic bottleneck, where interbreeding with previous species of Homo became difficult if not totally impossible, thanks in no
    small part to the chromosome fusion.

    But, erectus was a tropical into sub tropics species, so it quickly began to diversify just
    as all the previous species of Homo did.






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/710425976700649472

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marc Verhaegen@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 1 04:19:51 2023
    Op dinsdag 28 februari 2023 om 07:27:50 UTC+1 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    I just googled "Michael Holick pachyosteoporosis aquatic evolution":
    0 results...

    I tried Bing and it returned some images.

    H.erectus cs reached islands, got brains 2x apes-apiths (DHA), had flat feet (cursorial
    mammals run on toes or hooves=nails), they had a broad thorax & pelvis (= also lateral
    arms & leg movements), etc.etc. And than these idiots conclude: our ancestors ran
    after antelopes... :-DDD

    The odd thing is that erectus aligns with estimates -- guess work? -- on the dating for the
    "Modern" human brain and the loss of the baculum. And, according to some sources, the
    chromosome fusion. I've seen a very good argument, indirectly, for erectus being "Modern
    Man," the first of our species.
    ....the claim was that, given our genetics, we've likely been a single species for the
    better part of 2 million years, which aligns perfectly with erectus, ignoring some made
    up crap about an early African erectus.
    If I'm allowed to speculate then try this one on for size:
    Erectus represented something of a genetic bottleneck, where interbreeding with
    previous species of Homo became difficult if not totally impossible, thanks in no
    small part to the chromosome fusion.
    But, erectus was a tropical into sub tropics species, so it quickly began to diversify just
    as all the previous species of Homo did.

    Yes, no doubt, H.erectus was close relative/ancestor of Hs & Hn,
    but I'm still not sure about e.g. H.ergaster in Africa:
    parallelism, convergence or close relative of H.erectus?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Marc Verhaegen on Wed Mar 1 14:36:44 2023
    Marc Verhaegen wrote:

    Yes, no doubt, H.erectus was close relative/ancestor of Hs & Hn,
    but I'm still not sure about e.g. H.ergaster in Africa:
    parallelism, convergence or close relative of H.erectus?

    I suspect that "Bottleneck," of sorts, where interbreeding stopped
    or severely slowed down. Probably due to the chromosome
    fusion or at least greatly helped.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/710557546325409792

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 1 16:03:47 2023
    ...
    Yes, no doubt, H.erectus was close relative/ancestor of Hs & Hn,
    but I'm still not sure about e.g. H.ergaster in Africa:
    parallelism, convergence or close relative of H.erectus?

    I just read the abstract of:
    "Structural Analyses of the Midshaft in an Isolated Femur from Koobi Fora, Kenya:
    Implications for Taxonomic Identity"
    Michele M Bleuze 2022 PaleoAnthropology doi org/10.48738/2022.iss2.132
    ... ER-1592 consistently falls with ER-803a & -1807, ER-803a has been cranio-dentally aligned with H.erectus, ER-1807 has been morphometrically aligned with H.erectus & “erectus-like” femora.

    I looked up ER (East-Rudolf=East-Turkana) in my ow book (2022):
    "... Homo-werktuigen of -fossielen aan Oost-Afrikaanse meren lijken samen te gaan met hoge zeenivo’s (~2½, ~1,8 en ~1 Ma, Trauth 2005). José Joordens vermoedt dan telkens zeeverbindingen. Het Turkana-meer, zegt José’s mooie proefschrift, was toen (
    ~1,8 Ma) veel rijker aan eetbare schelpdieren dan nu. Er leefden blijkbaar tenminste drie soorten hominiden: de Gorilla-achtige boisei, de Homo-achtige ergaster, en de Pan-achtige habilis (resp. bv. ER-406, ER-3733 en ER-1813). Was boisei een '
    draslandgorilla' met papyrus-dieet? ergaster een schelpdieretende Homo of misschien zelfs Pan uit Indische Oceaankusten? en sommige habilis fruitetende bonobo-verwanten uit Oost-Afrikaanse kustbossen, die kleiner werden, zodat hun dieet minder overlapte
    met boisei en ergaster? Totaal onzeker." (meren=lakes, zeeverbindingen=sea-connections, drasland=swamp, onzeker=uncertain)

    Was ER-1592 H.ergaster<erectus, following the Ind.Ocean coasts?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Tue Mar 14 23:07:20 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Op maandag 27 februari 2023 om 07:30:34 UTC+1 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Snorkel noser doesn't understand

    We're always so kind to you, so polite, despite your many obvious
    flaws... your many, many flaws... many, many, many, many flaws...
    Anyhow, we're always so cordial, pretending not to notice the
    drool, never asking about the stains on the front of your pants,
    and yet you return our charity with such rudeness! Did they teach
    you nothing at that trailer park? I mean, nothing besides savanna
    idiocy?

    I just googled "Michael Holick pachyosteoporosis aquatic evolution":
    0 results...

    "pachyosteoporosis" - zero hits

    "Michael Holick" evolution - 106K hits

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 15 03:20:23 2023
    Kudu runner:

    "pachyosteoporosis" - zero hits

    :-D Wh

    "Michael Holick" evolution - 106K hits

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 15 03:26:09 2023
    Kudu runner:

    "pachyosteoporosis" - zero hits

    :-D What had you thought, my boy??
    Google "osteosclerosis".


    "Michael Holick" evolution - 106K hits

    Of course, he knows vit.D is very abundant in seafood.

    Only incredible imbeciles still believe their Plio- or Pleistocene ancestors ran after kudus in African savannas.
    :-DDD

    Google "GondwanaTalks Verhaegen".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Mar 26 21:39:48 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Kudu runner:

    "pachyosteoporosis" - zero hits

    :-D What had you thought, my boy??
    Google "osteosclerosis".

    "pachyosteoporosis" is what you wrote.

    "Michael Holick" evolution - 106K hits

    Of course, he knows vit.D is very abundant in seafood.

    Only incredible imbeciles still believe their Plio- or Pleistocene ancestors ran after kudus in African savannas.
    :-DDD

    Google "GondwanaTalks Verhaegen".


    Google evolution of human running...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Tue Mar 28 01:24:04 2023
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Google evolution of human running...

    You don't make a good parrot, bird brain.




    -- --

    https://uapro.tumblr.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 28 04:32:43 2023
    Op dinsdag 28 maart 2023 om 10:24:06 UTC+2 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    kudu runner:
    Google evolution of human running...

    You don't make a good parrot, bird brain.

    Yes, these imbeciles repeat each other without thinking...
    Savanna runners are a waste of time, JTEM: they'll never understand.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)