• kudu hunters

    From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 05:00:24 2023
    http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/vincent.balter/Articles/Balter(JHE)06.pdf
    Diet and behavior of the Saint-Césaire Neanderthal inferred from biogeochemical data inversion
    Bio-geo-chemistry is a powerful tool for dietary reconstruction,
    we use mixing equations to quantify the contribution of multiple sources to an individual's diet.
    Our goals:
    1) generalize the inverse method to dietary mixtures;
    2) reconstruct the diet of the St-Césaire Hn, using
    -- Sr/Ca & Ba/Ca data of the mineral fraction of bone (hydroxyl-apatite),
    -- with published δ13C & δ15N data of the associated organic fraction of bone (collagen).
    A new method is proposed to calculate the maximum diagenetic contribution of the Sr/Ba ratio,
    we assume: the soil soluble fraction is the diagenetic end-member,
    for a given fraction of diagenesis, this allows the restoration of the original Sr/Ba ratio.
    We consider the St-Césaire Châtelperronian mammalian assemblage as the meat source,(??? --mv)
    on the basis of available Sr, Ba & Ca contents of plants, the results indicate: the % of plants in the Hn diet must have been close to 0 for realistic Sr & Ba impoverishment between diet & hydroxyl-apatite.
    Contrary to previous studies, it is shown:
    fish could constitute 30 % of the St-Césaire Hn's diet,
    but this mass balance solution is not supported by the zoo-archaeological data.(:-DDD --mv)
    When the entire faunal assemblage is considered as the dietary source,(??? --mv) the calculation shows:
    -- bovids (except reindeer) represent 58 % of consumed meat,
    -- horse/rhino 22 %,
    -- reindeer 13 %,
    -- mammoth 7 %.
    These respective %% are in close accordance with zoo-archaeological records,(:-DDD --mv)
    this suggests: the faunal assemblage ass.x the St-Césaire Hn reliably reflects what he ate during the last few years of his life,
    this supports: this Hn carried the foodstuffs back to the St-Césaire shelter before their consumption.

    :-DDD

    Excellent example of the stupidity of the kudu=bovid hunters!
    They begin by assuming Hn ate meat, and then conclude Hn ate meat...

    I don't say Hn's diet didn't include meat, but comparative anatomy is clear:
    - POS (pachy-osteo-sclerosis He>>Hn>>Hs) is only seen in shallow diving tetrapods,
    - platycephaly: very low long flat skull,
    - platymeria: dorso-ventrally flattened femora + very long femoral neck = lateral leg movements, not running!!
    - platypelloidy = very broad pelvis = idem: lateral leg movements,
    - very valgus knees = not often running,
    - shorter tibias Hn<Hs,
    - feet even flatter >Hs,
    - big nose, surrounded by large paranasal air sinuses,
    - extremely large brain (CC++) suggests incl. aq.foods: DHA etc.

    Most likely, Hn had a very varied diet (CC++), not fully coastal (POS<<He), but still incl. frequent diving + back-floating, probably for consuming aq.plants & opening shellfish.
    Hn is typically found at coasts or big rivers: I assume they seasonally followed the Meuse, Rhine etc. inland: salmon trek??
    If they hunted at all - they were even slower than we are on land! - they used traps etc.?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 05:28:00 2023
    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation:
    for chasing bovids??

    :-DDD

    http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/vincent.balter/Articles/Balter(JHE)06.pdf
    Diet and behavior of the Saint-Césaire Neanderthal inferred from biogeochemical data inversion
    Bio-geo-chemistry is a powerful tool for dietary reconstruction,
    we use mixing equations to quantify the contribution of multiple sources to an individual's diet.
    Our goals:
    1) generalize the inverse method to dietary mixtures;
    2) reconstruct the diet of the St-Césaire Hn, using
    -- Sr/Ca & Ba/Ca data of the mineral fraction of bone (hydroxyl-apatite),
    -- with published δ13C & δ15N data of the associated organic fraction of bone (collagen).
    A new method is proposed to calculate the maximum diagenetic contribution of the Sr/Ba ratio,
    we assume: the soil soluble fraction is the diagenetic end-member,
    for a given fraction of diagenesis, this allows the restoration of the original Sr/Ba ratio.
    We consider the St-Césaire Châtelperronian mammalian assemblage as the meat source,(??? --mv)
    on the basis of available Sr, Ba & Ca contents of plants, the results indicate:
    the % of plants in the Hn diet must have been close to 0 for realistic Sr & Ba impoverishment between diet & hydroxyl-apatite.
    Contrary to previous studies, it is shown:
    fish could constitute 30 % of the St-Césaire Hn's diet,
    but this mass balance solution is not supported by the zoo-archaeological data.(:-DDD --mv)
    When the entire faunal assemblage is considered as the dietary source,(??? --mv) the calculation shows:
    -- bovids (except reindeer) represent 58 % of consumed meat,
    -- horse/rhino 22 %,
    -- reindeer 13 %,
    -- mammoth 7 %.
    These respective %% are in close accordance with zoo-archaeological records,(:-DDD --mv)
    this suggests: the faunal assemblage ass.x the St-Césaire Hn reliably reflects what he ate during the last few years of his life,
    this supports: this Hn carried the foodstuffs back to the St-Césaire shelter before their consumption.

    :-DDD

    Excellent example of the stupidity of the kudu=bovid hunters!
    They begin by assuming Hn ate meat, and then conclude Hn ate meat...

    I don't say Hn's diet didn't include meat, but comparative anatomy is clear: - POS (pachy-osteo-sclerosis He>>Hn>>Hs) is only seen in shallow diving tetrapods,
    - platycephaly: very low long flat skull,
    - platymeria: dorso-ventrally flattened femora + very long femoral neck = lateral leg movements, not running!!
    - platypelloidy = very broad pelvis = idem: lateral leg movements,
    - very valgus knees = not often running,
    - shorter tibias Hn<Hs,
    - feet even flatter >Hs,
    - big nose, surrounded by large paranasal air sinuses,
    - extremely large brain (CC++) suggests incl. aq.foods: DHA etc.

    Most likely, Hn had a very varied diet (CC++), not fully coastal (POS<<He), but still incl. frequent diving + back-floating, probably for consuming aq.plants & opening shellfish.
    Hn is typically found at coasts or big rivers: I assume they seasonally followed the Meuse, Rhine etc. inland: salmon trek??
    If they hunted at all - they were even slower than we are on land! - they used traps etc.?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 06:06:50 2023
    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Kudu runner:

    If it's pathology, as in modern humans, then it indicates they were
    not adapted to such a lifestyle.
    If it's an adaptation (e.g. against barotrauma) then all Hn's should
    have it bilaterally.
    Which one is it?

    :-DDD A typical example of your infantile black-white thinking.

    Auditory exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Sun Feb 5 14:38:33 2023
    On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 05:28:00 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:

    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation:

    If it's pathology, as in modern humans, then it indicates they were
    not adapted to such a lifestyle.
    If it's an adaptation (e.g. against barotrauma) then all Hn's should
    have it bilaterally.

    Which one is it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Sun Feb 5 15:33:33 2023
    On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 06:06:50 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:

    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Kudu runner:

    If it's pathology, as in modern humans, then it indicates they were
    not adapted to such a lifestyle.
    If it's an adaptation (e.g. against barotrauma) then all Hn's should
    have it bilaterally.
    Which one is it?

    :-DDD A typical example of your infantile black-white thinking.

    Auditory exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Yes, more than 50% incidence in Neandertals, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220464

    an indication they were not very well adapted to such a lifestyle, and
    to little to be a species-level adaptation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 08:01:02 2023
    I there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.
    But this is already too difficult for fanatic believers in Sta Savanna...
    Why don't these idiots waste their own time??

    _____


    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Kudu runner:

    If it's pathology, as in modern humans, then it indicates they were
    not adapted to such a lifestyle.
    If it's an adaptation (e.g. against barotrauma) then all Hn's should
    have it bilaterally.
    Which one is it?

    :-DDD A typical example of your infantile black-white thinking.

    Auditory exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Yes, more than 50% incidence in Neandertals, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220464

    an indication they were not very well adapted to such a lifestyle, and
    to little to be a species-level adaptation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 5 11:07:54 2023
    MP Richards 2007 pp.223-234 in "Diet shift at the Middle/Upper Palaeolithic transition in Europe? The stable isotope evidence" W Roebroeks ed. "Guts and Brains" Leiden UP Fig.1 & 2
    Same results in e.g. C Wißing cs 2016 Quat Internat 411:327-345 "Isotopic evidence for dietary ecology of late Neandertals in NW-Europe" C Wißing cs 2019 Scient Reports 9:4433:
    Neandertal isotopes are perfectly intermediate between freshwater & coastal foods, very very unlike terrestrial foods.
    Only incredible imbeciles believe neandertals ran after bovids!!
    Hn simply seasonally followed the river inland.

    I can't understand how stupid stupid stupid the kudu runners are.

    _________

    http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/vincent.balter/Articles/Balter(JHE)06.pdf
    Diet and behavior of the Saint-Césaire Neanderthal inferred from biogeochemical data inversion
    Bio-geo-chemistry is a powerful tool for dietary reconstruction,
    we use mixing equations to quantify the contribution of multiple sources to an individual's diet.
    Our goals:
    1) generalize the inverse method to dietary mixtures;
    2) reconstruct the diet of the St-Césaire Hn, using
    -- Sr/Ca & Ba/Ca data of the mineral fraction of bone (hydroxyl-apatite),
    -- with published δ13C & δ15N data of the associated organic fraction of bone (collagen).
    A new method is proposed to calculate the maximum diagenetic contribution of the Sr/Ba ratio,
    we assume: the soil soluble fraction is the diagenetic end-member,
    for a given fraction of diagenesis, this allows the restoration of the original Sr/Ba ratio.
    We consider the St-Césaire Châtelperronian mammalian assemblage as the meat source,(??? --mv)
    on the basis of available Sr, Ba & Ca contents of plants, the results indicate:
    the % of plants in the Hn diet must have been close to 0 for realistic Sr & Ba impoverishment between diet & hydroxyl-apatite.
    Contrary to previous studies, it is shown:
    fish could constitute 30 % of the St-Césaire Hn's diet,
    but this mass balance solution is not supported by the zoo-archaeological data.(:-DDD --mv)
    When the entire faunal assemblage is considered as the dietary source,(??? --mv) the calculation shows:
    -- bovids (except reindeer) represent 58 % of consumed meat,
    -- horse/rhino 22 %,
    -- reindeer 13 %,
    -- mammoth 7 %.
    These respective %% are in close accordance with zoo-archaeological records,(:-DDD --mv)
    this suggests: the faunal assemblage ass.x the St-Césaire Hn reliably reflects what he ate during the last few years of his life,
    this supports: this Hn carried the foodstuffs back to the St-Césaire shelter before their consumption.

    :-DDD

    Excellent example of the stupidity of the kudu=bovid hunters!
    They begin by assuming Hn ate meat, and then conclude Hn ate meat...

    I don't say Hn's diet didn't include meat, but comparative anatomy is clear: - POS (pachy-osteo-sclerosis He>>Hn>>Hs) is only seen in shallow diving tetrapods,
    - platycephaly: very low long flat skull,
    - platymeria: dorso-ventrally flattened femora + very long femoral neck = lateral leg movements, not running!!
    - platypelloidy = very broad pelvis = idem: lateral leg movements,
    - very valgus knees = not often running,
    - shorter tibias Hn<Hs,
    - feet even flatter >Hs,
    - big nose, surrounded by large paranasal air sinuses,
    - extremely large brain (CC++) suggests incl. aq.foods: DHA etc.

    Most likely, Hn had a very varied diet (CC++), not fully coastal (POS<<He), but still incl. frequent diving + back-floating, probably for consuming aq.plants & opening shellfish.
    Hn is typically found at coasts or big rivers: I assume they seasonally followed the Meuse, Rhine etc. inland: salmon trek??
    If they hunted at all - they were even slower than we are on land! - they used traps etc.?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Tue Feb 7 17:10:14 2023
    On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 08:01:02 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:

    I there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?
    I mean, La Ferrassie 1 has it bilaterally (grade 1) but La Ferrassie 2
    does not (grade 0), Saccopastore 1 has it (left, grade 1) but
    Saccopastore 2 does not, Shanidar 1 has it bilaterally (grade 3) but
    Shanidar 5 does not.

    Does Saint-Cesaire have ear exostoses?

    But this is already too difficult for fanatic believers in Sta Savanna...
    Why don't these idiots waste their own time??

    What worries me a bit is that only three fish bones were identified at Saint-Cesaire, possibly corresponding to as many individuals, based on
    size and morphology, out of a total of 824. That's 0.3%. And those are identified as cyprinid (1) and brown trout (2), not salmon.
    The vast majority of the animal remains from the Neanderthal layer
    (Ejop sup) are reindeer, bison and horse (19.7%, 47.4%, 17%
    respectively).
    See chapter 5 in:
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150972

    This is what Balter and Simon mean when they argue that fish
    consumption at Saint-Cesaire "is not supported by the
    zooarchaeological data:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.008

    I forgot Hn's ear-exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Kudu runner:

    If it's pathology, as in modern humans, then it indicates they were
    not adapted to such a lifestyle.
    If it's an adaptation (e.g. against barotrauma) then all Hn's should
    have it bilaterally.
    Which one is it?

    :-DDD A typical example of your infantile black-white thinking.

    Auditory exostoses = cold water irrigation.

    Yes, more than 50% incidence in Neandertals,
    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220464

    an indication they were not very well adapted to such a lifestyle, and
    to little to be a species-level adaptation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 7 15:23:47 2023
    If there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    Kudu runner:
    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?

    :-DDD

    Grow up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Wed Feb 8 15:54:47 2023
    On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:23:47 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:

    If there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    Kudu runner:
    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?

    :-DDD

    Grow up.

    I'm trying to help you here, to find evidence for seasonal migration
    along rivers and salmon fishing at Saint-Cesaire, but with only 0.3%
    fish remains (none from Salmonidae) at the Neandertal level at this
    site there isn't much I can do I'm afraid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 8 08:25:53 2023
    If there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    Kudu runner:
    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?

    :-DDD Grow up.

    I'm trying to help you here, to find evidence for seasonal migration
    along rivers and salmon fishing at Saint-Cesaire, but with only 0.3%

    Thanks, my boy, that's more than I expected.

    fish remains (none from Salmonidae) at the Neandertal level at this
    site there isn't much I can do I'm afraid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Wed Feb 8 19:29:09 2023
    On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:25:53 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:


    If there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    Kudu runner:
    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?

    :-DDD Grow up.

    I'm trying to help you here, to find evidence for seasonal migration
    along rivers and salmon fishing at Saint-Cesaire, but with only 0.3%

    Thanks, my boy, that's more than I expected.

    Really, how much did you expect? 0.2%, 0.1%, or 0.0%?
    And how does that compare to 73% artiodactyls and 21% perissodactyls?

    fish remains (none from Salmonidae) at the Neandertal level at this
    site there isn't much I can do I'm afraid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 12 22:42:37 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:

    If there's only 1 Neandertal with ear exostoses, this Neandertal frequently swam in colder water.

    Kudu runner:
    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?

    :-DDD Grow up.

    I'm trying to help you here, to find evidence for seasonal migration
    along rivers and salmon fishing at Saint-Cesaire, but with only 0.3%

    Thanks, my boy, that's more than I expected.

    Or deserve. Now child, explain Pandora's info:

    And what if that Neandertal does not have any ear exostoses at all?
    I mean, La Ferrassie 1 has it bilaterally (grade 1) but La Ferrassie 2
    does not (grade 0), Saccopastore 1 has it (left, grade 1) but
    Saccopastore 2 does not, Shanidar 1 has it bilaterally (grade 3) but
    Shanidar 5 does not.



    fish remains (none from Salmonidae) at the Neandertal level at this
    site there isn't much I can do I'm afraid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 12 22:37:32 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:


    The REAL abstract


    http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/vincent.balter/Articles/Balter(JHE)06.pdf
    Diet and behavior of the Saint-Ce´saire Neanderthal
    inferred from biogeochemical data inversion

    Abstract
    Biogeochemistry is a powerful tool for dietary
    reconstruction, and mixing equations can be used to
    quantify the contribution of multiple sources to an
    individual's diet. The goals of this paper are: 1) to
    generalize the inverse method to dietary mixtures;
    and 2) to reconstruct the diet of the Saint-Césaire
    Neanderthal using Sr/Ca and Ba/Ca data of the mineral
    fraction of bone (hydroxylapatite), and with published
    δ13C and δ15N data of the associated organic fraction
    of bone (collagen). A new method is proposed to
    calculate the maximum diagenetic contribution of the
    Sr/Ba ratio, assuming that the soil soluble fraction
    is the diagenetic end-member and, for a given fraction
    of diagenesis, allows the restoration of the original
    Sr/Ba ratio. Considering the Saint-Césaire
    Châtelperronian mammalian assemblage as the meat
    source, and on the basis of available Sr, Ba, and Ca
    contents of plants, the results indicate that the
    percentage of plants in the Neanderthal's diet must
    have been close to zero for realistic Sr and Ba
    impoverishment between diet and hydroxylapatite.
    Contrary to previous studies, it is shown that fish
    could constitute a significant proportion (30%) of
    the diet of the Saint-Césaire Neanderthal. However,
    this mass balance solution is not supported by the
    zooarchaeological data. When the entire faunal
    assemblage is considered as the dietary source, the
    calculation shows that bovids (except reindeer)
    represent the greatest percentage of consumed meat
    (58%), followed by horses/rhinoceros (22%), reindeer
    (13%), and mammoths (7%). These respective percentages
    are in close accordance with zooarchaeological records,
    suggesting that the faunal assemblage associated with
    the Neanderthal of Saint-Césaire reliably reflects what
    he ate during the last few years of his life. In
    behavioral terms, this result supports the hypothesis
    that this Neanderthal carried the foodstuffs back to
    the Saint-Césaire shelter before their consumption.


    From the conclusion:

    "In the case of the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic site of
    Saint-Ce´saire, it is shown that even if 27% of the
    Sr/Ba ratio of the Neanderthal could be explained by
    diagenesis, plant resources did not constitute a
    sizable proportion of the diet of the Neanderthal.
    However, from the elemental and isotopic points of
    view, it is possible that fish may have contributed
    to the overall biogeochemical signature of the
    Neanderthal, although this result is not supported by
    zooarchaeological data. When the ungulates are pooled
    according to their elemental and isotopic pattern,
    their respective proportions in the diet of the
    Neanderthal resemble those deduced by zooarchaeology.
    This suggests that this Neanderthal brought the
    foodstuffs back to the site before their consumption,
    and thus did not practice passive scavenging."




    :-DDD

    Excellent example of the stupidity of the kudu=bovid hunters!
    They begin by assuming Hn ate meat, and then conclude Hn ate meat...

    I don't say Hn's diet didn't include meat, but comparative anatomy is clear:

    The biogeochemical data is more clear.

    BTW, comparative data doesn't explain why ALL aquatic mammals are
    quadrupeds.

    :=DDDDDDDDD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)