• JTEM's scientific philosophy

    From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 01:41:17 2023
    #1. Linear models suck.

    Gorillas => Chimps => Humans => Morons

    #2. Once you prove that something CAN and WILL
    happen you need to propose a mechanism to stop it
    from happening again or it will keep on happening
    over & over.

    Bipedalism... domesticating dogs.. reaching the
    Americas... etc.

    #3. The better part of being smart isn't knowing
    more than anyone else, it's not forgetting what you
    know (unlike everyone else).

    I made a whole bunch of people look like absolute
    jackasses after I argued interbreeding (between
    Neanderthals/etc) FOR YEARS, and was proven right.
    But the thing is that I wasn't smarter than anyone else,
    and I certainly didn't have knowledge that all those
    others lacked. I simply refused to throw aside what I
    knew from _Here_ and instead applied it to _There_.

    Unlike everyone else.

    I took the basic assumptions from one study and
    applied them to the next. Done. It was easier, it took
    LESS brain work -- consistency is a time saver -- and
    yet almost nobody is willing to do that.

    #4. When you always agree with the status quo, you
    are not thinking. And you are literally not thinking. For
    real. You're not even agreeing. You're obeying.

    There's an old saying that goes; "When two men
    always agree one of them is unnecessary."

    We're not talking about "1 + 1 = 2" here. Even things
    you've been trained to believe are concrete, like DNA
    "Evidence," has ENORMOUS room for interpretation
    and debate.

    #5. Peer Review is a mistake. Work is supposed to
    be scrutinized AFTER it's published. The debate BEGINS
    with publication. And yet legions of idiots believe that
    if nonsense has been published "In a peer reviewed
    journal" that makes it sound science.

    Truth is there is example, after example, after example
    after example of absolute rubbish making it past peer
    review. But such examples are easy to find, IF YOU LOOK.
    What is difficult to find is good science, SOUND scientific
    work that was STOPPED from being published by Peer
    Review. It's out there, it happens every day but you don't
    see it... IT NEVER GOT PUBLISHED so you can't see it. And
    the drones have been trained so well that they wouldn't
    give it a second thought if they did see it, "Because it
    wasn't published in a peer review journal."



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/707213869566787584

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)