1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ANTHROPOLOGY.PALEO

  • traditional PAs were wrong +-everywhere

    From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 7 14:16:47 2023
    1) Homo came from S.Asia, not Africa
    2) we've always been waterside, never savanna
    3) australopiths were fossil Pan & Gorilla, not Homo
    4) all Hominoidea >20 Ma were bipedal: aquarboreal
    5) we were shellfish hunters, not hunters
    6) flat feet = swim/wade, not run
    7) etc.etc.etc.
    How stupid can self-declared "scientists" be?
    and for >50 years!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Sat Jan 7 19:00:41 2023
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:

    1) Homo came from S.Asia, not Africa

    Almost for certain at this point. But the population descended from
    migrations into Africa won the Repopulation race, after Toba, so they
    can claim a "Technical" OoA origins.

    2) we've always been waterside, never savanna

    True. We're waterside now.

    3) australopiths were fossil Pan & Gorilla, not Homo

    This is where I argue with you. I say that they are descended from
    a waterside population.

    4) all Hominoidea >20 Ma were bipedal: aquarboreal

    True.

    5) we were shellfish hunters, not hunters

    Our ancestors turned hunting into scavenging: Eating shellfish.

    6) flat feet = swim/wade, not run

    Even modern humans aren't runners. We're walkers with an
    ability to run.

    7) etc.etc.etc.
    How stupid can self-declared "scientists" be?
    and for >50 years!!

    They are trained to be stupid. You earn a degree in paleo anthropology
    by vomiting back what has been dictated to you.

    People are well trained, not well informed.



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/705742582064496640

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 8 02:01:24 2023
    Op zondag 8 januari 2023 om 04:00:42 UTC+1 schreef JTEM is so reasonable:

    1) Homo came from S.Asia, not Africa

    Almost for certain at this point. But the population descended from migrations into Africa won the Repopulation race, after Toba, so they
    can claim a "Technical" OoA origins.

    Not impossible, but I'm not sure of this: very likely the Hs LCA lived somewhere in S-Asia, they might have split in the Middle East. It's possible IMO that most Europeans did not have any African ancestors.

    2) we've always been waterside, never savanna

    True. We're waterside now.

    Yes, and ancestors (esp. early-Pleist.?) were a lot more aquatic.

    3) australopiths were fossil Pan & Gorilla, not Homo

    This is where I argue with you. I say that they are descended from a waterside population.

    Australopiths were still aquarboreal AFAICS: vertical waders-clmibers in swamp forests.

    4) all Hominoidea >20 Ma were bipedal: aquarboreal

    True.

    5) we were shellfish hunters, not hunters

    Our ancestors turned hunting into scavenging: Eating shellfish.

    Let's agree to disagree here (Elaine Morgan often said that to me). We never hunted IMO until in some populations late-Pleistocene.

    6) flat feet = swim/wade, not run

    Even modern humans aren't runners. We're walkers with an ability to run.

    Exactly.

    7) etc.etc.etc.
    How stupid can self-declared "scientists" be?
    and for >50 years!!

    They are trained to be stupid. You earn a degree in paleo anthropology
    by vomiting back what has been dictated to you.
    People are well trained, not well informed.

    Exactly.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)