• Another reason why AA is right and savanna nonsense is not

    From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 16 04:51:37 2022
    Animals get bigger for a reason. I remember, a billion
    years ago (maybe 2 billion), it was very often stated
    that "Size is a defense." And that seems true.

    https://a-z-animals.com/blog/8-animals-that-can-kill-an-elephant/

    Well, hey, so size isn't always a defense...

    And if an elephant's size isn't proof against predation,
    can we all agree that your hominids didn't grow large
    for defense? Or at least not in defense against anything
    in a savanna?

    No, "Bigger" is usually a sign of a lack of predators, and
    thus the members of a population are primarily in
    competition with each other... the species is competing
    with itself...

    Google: "insular gigantism"

    Gorillas, for example, are in very stiff competition. You've
    got a dominant male, a bunch of females and a whole lot
    of sexually frustrated loners... so they have to be big and
    strong. If they're not bigger and stronger than the next
    male, they're not getting laid!

    So we have to account for size, and that size was either a
    vestige of an ancestral form or it is reflective of what their
    social order was.

    This might also help to explain Neanderthal anatomy,
    which pretty much everyone agrees was POWERFUL. If
    Neanderthals were a lot closer to gorillas than Bonobos
    in breeding style, and there seems to be evidence
    consistent with the notion, then they were in competition
    against each other, driving evolution into something a
    tad stronger than a Sherman tank...

    The short & sweet? I don't see any scenario where a
    savanna environment does this. They're in competition
    with themselves, driving them larger while at the same
    time a prime target for savanna predators..

    Nope. Don't like.

    I see a need for a different environment, one ABSENT
    predators. And I have difficulty with the usually island
    scenario because that can and supposedly DOES very
    often lead to insular gigantism, it's typically followed
    by insular dwarfism! Some have gone on to claim that
    every instance of insular dwarfism was preceded by
    gigantism...

    It's logical.

    Cut off, without any real predators, they find themselves
    in competition with themselves, driving up size. Then
    island resources dwindle, placing all the selective
    pressure on getting small...

    But the island does work, and many people have raised
    it as a likely origins for "Hominoidea," and it does fit
    nicely the "Punctuated Equilibrium" model... and as our
    good Doctor tells us; "Isolation is the engine of evolution."

    Wow. Are you guys great, or what?

    You came up with the island idea... when? How long ago?

    Seems pretty strong. But we are talking *Way* back, more
    than 7 million years ago... perhaps more than 9 million...

    (Someone help me with the dates)

    Just saying.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/703676573069590528

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)