1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ANTHROPOLOGY.PALEO

  • Naledi used fire? No cutmarks. Funeral pyres?

    From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 3 07:56:06 2022
    https://twitter.com/carnegiescience/status/1598477828349169664?t=wG7ezpUh2GMxra95RADZVA&s=09

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 4 01:17:40 2022
    Naledi is a rorschach test. All the crazies look at it and see
    whatever it is their mangled, delusional minds want to see.

    Originally they said it was over 2 million years old, had a
    modern brain -- or "Modern Structures" in the brain -- and
    was a human ancestor that re-wrote the book on human
    origins. Some mouth breathers even claimed that it
    buried it's dead! Of course all these claims were quickly
    shredded yet their conclusions remained the same!

    Do you know what they call it when your conclusion remains
    the same even when you alleged basis for it keeps changing?

    Relax. That's a rhetorical question.

    They call it "Circular Thinking."

    Google it. Learn something.

    Later you can Google the meaning & correct use of "GIGO."





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/Darwinism

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 5 02:55:24 2022
    For *scientific* information on naledi, google
    "not Homo but Pan or Australopithecus naledi".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 5 14:36:29 2022
    On Saturday, December 3, 2022 at 10:56:08 AM UTC-5, DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
    https://twitter.com/carnegiescience/status/1598477828349169664?t=wG7ezpUh2GMxra95RADZVA&s=09
    No peer review yet. Claims of 3 more nuggets coming. WIldfires?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)