• Mojokerto = sea-coast or delta

    From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 21 13:34:05 2022
    Relocation of the 1936 Mojokerto skull discovery site near Perning, East Java OF Huffman cs 2005 JHE 50:431-451

    The fossil calvaria of "the Mojokerto child" was discovered in 1936, but uncertainties have persisted about its paleo-environmental context & geological age because of difficulties in relocating the discovery site.
    Past relocation efforts were hindered by
    - inaccuracies in old base maps,
    - intensive post-1930s agricultural terracing,
    - new tree & brush growth.
    Fortunately, geologic cross-sections & site photographs (1936-1938, not fully utilized in past relocation fieldwork) closely circumscribe site geography & geology. These documents match the conditions at just 1 sand-stone outcrop. It is situated on the
    southern margin of a topographic nose at the upper end of a c.18 m-wide gully (c.0663760 m E, 9183430 m N, UTM Zone 49M), c.15 m SE of the Kumai cs (1985) re-location.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.3.3 m of fossiliferous pebbly sand-stone, a river-channel deposit cut into tuffaceous mud-stone. The sand- & mud-stone beds correspond to original site descriptions. Pebbly sand-stone is also found within the skull. The
    calvaria is well-preserved, taphonomically similar to large & fragile spms found among several 100 vertebrate fossils excavated from the sandstone in 2001-2002. Since no well-preserved fossils were found intact at the surface of the sandstone, the good
    condition of the Mojokerto skull suggests: it was buried fully when discovered.
    The relocated hominin bed is the uppermost fluvial sandstone of a marine-deltaic sequence in the upper-Pucangan Fm. The Mojokerto child probably died along the ancient sea-coast, judging from
    - the large extent of the deltaic facies &
    - evidence that the calvaria experienced minimal transport.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.20 m stratigraphically above the horizon from which the widely cited 1.81 +-0.04 Ma 40/39Ar date for the skull (Swisher cs 1994) was obtained.
    Additional field & laboratory results will be required to determine the skull’s age.

    doi 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.11.002Jou

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Mon Nov 21 17:06:46 2022
    On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 4:34:06 PM UTC-5, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Relocation of the 1936 Mojokerto skull discovery site near Perning, East Java
    OF Huffman cs 2005 JHE 50:431-451

    The fossil calvaria of "the Mojokerto child" was discovered in 1936, but uncertainties have persisted about its paleo-environmental context & geological age because of difficulties in relocating the discovery site.
    Past relocation efforts were hindered by
    - inaccuracies in old base maps,
    - intensive post-1930s agricultural terracing,
    - new tree & brush growth.
    Fortunately, geologic cross-sections & site photographs (1936-1938, not fully utilized in past relocation fieldwork) closely circumscribe site geography & geology. These documents match the conditions at just 1 sand-stone outcrop. It is situated on
    the southern margin of a topographic nose at the upper end of a c.18 m-wide gully (c.0663760 m E, 9183430 m N, UTM Zone 49M), c.15 m SE of the Kumai cs (1985) re-location.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.3.3 m of fossiliferous pebbly sand-stone, a river-channel deposit cut into tuffaceous mud-stone. The sand- & mud-stone beds correspond to original site descriptions. Pebbly sand-stone is also found within the skull. The
    calvaria is well-preserved, taphonomically similar to large & fragile spms found among several 100 vertebrate fossils excavated from the sandstone in 2001-2002. Since no well-preserved fossils were found intact at the surface of the sandstone, the good
    condition of the Mojokerto skull suggests: it was buried fully when discovered.
    The relocated hominin bed is the uppermost fluvial sandstone of a marine-deltaic sequence in the upper-Pucangan Fm. The Mojokerto child probably died along the ancient sea-coast, judging from
    - the large extent of the deltaic facies &
    - evidence that the calvaria experienced minimal transport.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.20 m stratigraphically above the horizon from which the widely cited 1.81 +-0.04 Ma 40/39Ar date for the skull (Swisher cs 1994) was obtained.
    Additional field & laboratory results will be required to determine the skull’s age.

    doi 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.11.002Jou

    Age unknown.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 21 22:54:09 2022
    Relocation of the 1936 Mojokerto skull discovery site near Perning, East Java
    OF Huffman cs 2005 JHE 50:431-451

    The fossil calvaria of "the Mojokerto child" was discovered in 1936, but uncertainties have persisted about its paleo-environmental context & geological age because of difficulties in relocating the discovery site.
    Past relocation efforts were hindered by
    - inaccuracies in old base maps,
    - intensive post-1930s agricultural terracing,
    - new tree & brush growth.
    Fortunately, geologic cross-sections & site photographs (1936-1938, not fully utilized in past relocation fieldwork) closely circumscribe site geography & geology. These documents match the conditions at just 1 sand-stone outcrop. It is situated on
    the southern margin of a topographic nose at the upper end of a c.18 m-wide gully (c.0663760 m E, 9183430 m N, UTM Zone 49M), c.15 m SE of the Kumai cs (1985) re-location.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.3.3 m of fossiliferous pebbly sand-stone, a river-channel deposit cut into tuffaceous mud-stone. The sand- & mud-stone beds correspond to original site descriptions. Pebbly sand-stone is also found within the skull.
    The calvaria is well-preserved, taphonomically similar to large & fragile spms found among several 100 vertebrate fossils excavated from the sandstone in 2001-2002. Since no well-preserved fossils were found intact at the surface of the sandstone, the
    good condition of the Mojokerto skull suggests: it was buried fully when discovered.
    The relocated hominin bed is the uppermost fluvial sandstone of a marine-deltaic sequence in the upper-Pucangan Fm. The Mojokerto child probably died along the ancient sea-coast, judging from
    - the large extent of the deltaic facies &
    - evidence that the calvaria experienced minimal transport.
    The relocated discovery bed is c.20 m stratigraphically above the horizon from which the widely cited 1.81 +-0.04 Ma 40/39Ar date for the skull (Swisher cs 1994) was obtained.
    Additional field & laboratory results will be required to determine the skull’s age.

    doi 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.11.002Jou

    Age unknown.

    Pleistocene, my little boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pandora@21:1/5 to littoral.homo@gmail.com on Tue Nov 22 16:44:35 2022
    On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:34:05 -0800 (PST), "littor...@gmail.com" <littoral.homo@gmail.com> wrote:

    Relocation of the 1936 Mojokerto skull discovery site near Perning, East Java >OF Huffman cs 2005 JHE 50:431-451

    For paleoenvironmental reconstruction see fig. 8 in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338691956

    These hominins could have ventured anywhere from beach to montane
    forest. Trinil, Sangiran, Sambungmacan, Ngandong testify that
    Indonesian H. erectus was not restricted to the coast.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to Pandora on Tue Nov 22 22:36:57 2022
    Pandora wrote:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338691956

    : widely attributed to H. erectus

    Hmm. So the same "Academic" tradition that gave us Darwin, Piltdown
    Man and Naledi won't even definitely state that it's erectus but that
    doesn't so much as slow you down!

    And just for shits & giggles; what the fuck is wrong with you?

    Savanna idiocy can't get Homo anywhere. It just doesn't work. They're
    on a savanna, this is driving their evolution, it magics up the modern
    human form and then they all run off looking or a Burger King and end
    up everywhere....

    It's flagrant.

    Aquatic Ape explains everything. Aquatic Ape gets Homo everyone from
    Oceania to south Africa. It gets them to Turkana Basin and Java. It gets
    them in China over 2 million years ago. They're on the beach. They're
    following the water, picking up stuff & eating it. Occasionally some push inland, start adapting. But they all stay one species because that waterside population is still there -- the conduit through which DNA and technological developments can move.

    You're a child. A mentally damaged child -- there's your narcissistic personality disorder you so love to parade -- but just a child. You focus like a laser beam on one tiny data point, something you could never understand anyway, and you don't even try to see it in context -- all the other data points,
    the whole of human evolution!

    Nothing you ever advanced even fits Out of Africa purity, much less debunks
    a word of Aquatic Ape...






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/701569038790377472

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)