1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.ANTHROPOLOGY.PALEO

  • Re: When A Real Scientist Considers Human Evolution

    From James McGinn@21:1/5 to C. H. Engelbrecht on Tue Sep 6 09:19:43 2022
    On Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 11:17:15 AM UTC-7, C. H. Engelbrecht wrote:
    torsdag den 24. juni 2021 kl. 19.48.14 UTC+2 skrev jimmc...@gmail.com:
    On Thursday, June 24, 2021 at 9:16:19 AM UTC-7, C. H. Engelbrecht wrote:
    onsdag den 23. juni 2021 kl. 16.32.28 UTC+2 skrev jimmc...@gmail.com:
    On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 6:35:02 AM UTC-7, C. H. Engelbrecht wrote:
    onsdag den 23. juni 2021 kl. 11.13.35 UTC+2 skrev jimmc...@gmail.com:
    On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 1:16:07 AM UTC-7, C. H. Engelbrecht wrote:

    I think that was my point.
    You don't have a real point.
    Now you're completely lost, ain't you? Your trolling just completely collapsed. Don't feel down, it always happens.

    https://i.ytimg.com/vi/M9rpmrDeelk/hqdefault.jpg
    You got nothing.

    James McGinn / Genius
    Now it's just getting uninspired. No dopamine for you.
    Yes, it always devolves into some kind of ass scratching hypothesis of human evolution followed by the wet and dry versions thereof. Oh, well, for a few moments there we actually had a modicum of intelligent conversations. I suppose that is
    better than most.

    Goodbye dumbass.

    James McGinn / Genius
    You still put too much emphasis on hominin intellect. Trust me, in terms of selection and survival, it's overrated.
    I correctly attribute intellect to being a tool to achieve ideological reprogramming through culture. During periods of abundance (rainy season) hominids compete against other members of our community. During periods of scarcity (dry season) we
    cooperate with other members of our community.
    And what does cognitive power really have to do with all of that?
    Everything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 6 11:30:55 2022
    Op dinsdag 22 juni 2021 om 19:11:25 UTC+2 schreef James McGinn:
    We've all seen enough savanna vs. aquatic stupidity. Let's take a break from these lame non-arguments and see what transpires when a real scientist considers human evolution.
    Human Evolution and the Emergence of the Subconscious
    by James McGinn / Genius
    Turning us all into liars and brain-dead believers, the subconscious evolved as a means by which we maintain our ability to be reprogrammed with a new ideology. Human's are not rational but are hyper-pseudo rational, meaning that we have a deep
    emotional attachment to the belief in the absolute certainty of our ideological beliefs. ...

    Etc.

    A real scientist??? :-D

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JTEM is so reasonable@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Tue Sep 6 14:14:27 2022
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:

    A real scientist??? :-D

    He's a brain surgeon, or a streetcar conductor. One of those.
    Either way he was the 2021 recipient of the Greta van Derp
    award for achievement in science.




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/694526964376190976

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 6 15:08:49 2022
    Op woensdag 23 juni 2021 om 01:18:10 UTC+2 schreef C. H. Engelbrecht:


    We've all seen enough savanna vs. aquatic stupidity. Let's take a break from these lame non-arguments and see what transpires when a real scientist considers human evolution.
    ...

    We still need a big brain before we can do any of that. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16828044/

    Yes, obviously.
    When real scientists consider ape & human evolution, the results are obvious to all other real scientists,
    comparative biology leaves no doubt: google "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 8 08:55:24 2022
    Op woensdag 7 september 2022 om 00:08:50 UTC+2 schreef littor...@gmail.com:
    Op woensdag 23 juni 2021 om 01:18:10 UTC+2 schreef C. H. Engelbrecht:

    We've all seen enough savanna vs. aquatic stupidity. Let's take a break from these lame non-arguments and see what transpires when a real scientist considers human evolution.

    We still need a big brain before we can do any of that. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16828044/

    Yes, obviously.
    When real scientists consider ape & human evolution, the results are obvious to all other real scientists,
    comparative biology leaves no doubt: google "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo".

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323832499_Coastal_Dispersal_of_Pleistocene_Homo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Thu Sep 8 13:51:55 2022
    On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 11:55:25 AM UTC-4, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Op woensdag 7 september 2022 om 00:08:50 UTC+2 schreef littor...@gmail.com:
    Op woensdag 23 juni 2021 om 01:18:10 UTC+2 schreef C. H. Engelbrecht:

    We've all seen enough savanna vs. aquatic stupidity. Let's take a break from these lame non-arguments and see what transpires when a real scientist considers human evolution.
    We still need a big brain before we can do any of that. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16828044/

    Yes, obviously.
    When real scientists consider ape & human evolution, the results are obvious to all other real scientists,
    comparative biology leaves no doubt: google "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo".
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323832499_Coastal_Dispersal_of_Pleistocene_Homo

    Big brain & thick skull = Central India Narmada Man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)