• Re: Deforestation is causing dry climate

    From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 04:53:26 2021
    On 2.10.2021. 4:41, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
            And not the other way around.
            Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing
    dry climate:
    https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-latin-america-58743367
            As I am saying, first came humans with fire, and they made deforestation. Deforestation cause dry and cool climate.

    The fire (caused by humans): https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-latin-america-54239881

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 2 04:41:20 2021
    And not the other way around.
    Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused
    deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing dry climate: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-latin-america-58743367
    As I am saying, first came humans with fire, and they made deforestation. Deforestation cause dry and cool climate.

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 09:21:39 2021
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    And not the other way around.
    Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing dry climate:

    Cooling causes a dry climate. The glacial/interglacial cycle began long
    before the controlled use of fire.


    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663948262976487424

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sat Oct 2 19:24:23 2021
    On 2.10.2021. 18:21, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    And not the other way around.
    Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused
    deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing dry climate:

    Cooling causes a dry climate. The glacial/interglacial cycle began long before the controlled use of fire.

    Don't be so stupid.

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 11:15:29 2021
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    And not the other way around.
    Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused
    deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing dry climate:

    Cooling causes a dry climate. The glacial/interglacial cycle began long before the controlled use of fire.

    Don't be so stupid.

    Speaking of which:

    When did our current ice age, the Quaternary, begin?

    When did the controlled use of fire begin?

    You are SO lucky that you're immune to embarrassment...





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663948262976487424

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 18:06:47 2021
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    The newest date for the beginning of Quaternary is 2.6 mya: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary

    So the ice age began like two and a half million years ago.

    The date for the earliest evidence of controlled use of fire is up to
    2 mya:

    Well that's strongly disputed, that dating.

    Evidence != Proof

    Again, don't be so stupid.

    Lol! You just argued yourself into a whole.






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663350508580438016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sun Oct 3 02:54:28 2021
    On 2.10.2021. 20:15, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    And not the other way around.
    Scientists think that climate became dry, and this is what caused
    deforestation. No, it is actually deforestation that is causing dry climate:

    Cooling causes a dry climate. The glacial/interglacial cycle began long
    before the controlled use of fire.

    Don't be so stupid.

    Speaking of which:

    When did our current ice age, the Quaternary, begin?

    When did the controlled use of fire begin?

    You are SO lucky that you're immune to embarrassment...

    The newest date for the beginning of Quaternary is 2.6 mya: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary
    The date for the earliest evidence of controlled use of fire is up to
    2 mya:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_of_fire_by_early_humans
    Again, don't be so stupid. The fire that causes deforestation, and,
    hence, drying, isn't controlled. The evidence for the controlled use of
    fire, isn't the evidence for burning that goes on in Amazon.
    Before the controlled use of fire, there should be a prolonged period
    of uncontrolled use of fire, otherwise why would the control of fire
    take place at all?

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sun Oct 3 03:27:37 2021
    On 3.10.2021. 3:06, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    The newest date for the beginning of Quaternary is 2.6 mya:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary

    So the ice age began like two and a half million years ago.

    The date for the earliest evidence of controlled use of fire is up to
    2 mya:

    Well that's strongly disputed, that dating.

    It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more. It *isn't*
    the actual thing, it isn't the actual first occurrence. The evidence
    came much after the first occurrence. If you are not stupid, you would
    know this.

    Evidence != Proof

    Again, don't be so stupid.

    Lol! You just argued yourself into a whole.
    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 20:00:54 2021
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more. It

    So you're ignoring the evidence in favor of... nothing?





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663350508580438016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sun Oct 3 05:08:12 2021
    On 3.10.2021. 5:00, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more. It

    So you're ignoring the evidence in favor of... nothing?

    Gee, what's wrong with you?
    Who says that I am ignoring the evidence? And, especially the evidence
    of fire use. This evidence supports my theory, why would I ignore it?

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sun Oct 3 05:25:29 2021
    On 3.10.2021. 5:08, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    On 3.10.2021. 5:00, I Envy JTEM wrote:
      Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more. It

    So you're ignoring the evidence in favor of... nothing?

            Gee, what's wrong with you?
            Who says that I am ignoring the evidence? And, especially the evidence of fire use. This evidence supports my theory, why would I
    ignore it?

    Listen, you stupid JTEM.
    When the earliest evidence of some occurrence is 2 mya, it is the
    evidence that this thing didn't first occur *later* than 2 mya, it
    *isn't* the evidence that this thing didn't occur earlier than 2 mya.
    Gee, don't be so stupid.

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 21:50:14 2021
    Stupid fuck, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    Listen

    No. You're so fucked up you hide behind these sock puppets, and you're
    so fucking stupid you think it's cold air that carries the most moisture,
    not warm.

    Listening to you would lower someones I.Q., you dumb troll.





    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663996512177651712

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sat Oct 2 21:48:44 2021
    Crazy like a crazy person, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    So you're ignoring the evidence in favor of... nothing?

    Who says that I am ignoring the evidence? And, especially the evidence
    of fire use.

    Damn, you really play this handle like an idiot...

    : > Well that's strongly disputed, that dating.
    :
    : It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more.

    This evidence supports my theory

    Not according to you. Your own dating debunks you.

    And you're just stupid. Cool air carries less moisture. Google: Rain Shadow. It causes desertification by COOLING the air, losing the moisture on one
    side of a mountain, leaving a desert on the other. Cooling. The earth is much WETTER when it's hotter.








    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663996512177651712

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mario Petrinovic@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sun Oct 3 08:29:10 2021
    On 3.10.2021. 6:48, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    Crazy like a crazy person, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
    So you're ignoring the evidence in favor of... nothing?

    Who says that I am ignoring the evidence? And, especially the evidence
    of fire use.

    Damn, you really play this handle like an idiot...

    : > Well that's strongly disputed, that dating.
    :
    : It doesn't matter, it is just the evidence, nothing more.

    This evidence supports my theory

    Not according to you. Your own dating debunks you.

    And you're just stupid. Cool air carries less moisture. Google: Rain Shadow. It causes desertification by COOLING the air, losing the moisture on one
    side of a mountain, leaving a desert on the other. Cooling. The earth is much WETTER when it's hotter.

    Say "Hello" to the Pope on my behalf.

    --
    https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
    human-evolution@googlegroups.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Mario Petrinovic on Sun Oct 3 08:19:41 2021
    Mario Petrinovic wrote:

    Say

    Climate BASICS for children like you:

    Weather happens at what is called a "Front," where a cold
    "Front" comes into contact with a warm "Front." The warm
    air suddenly can't hold onto the moisture, when it hits the
    cold "Front" and cools, so it releases it as rain or snow.

    Because, now get this, speaking rhetorically, warm air holds
    a lot more water than cold air.






    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/663996512177651712

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)