On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
       Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
       First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were apes
who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
       Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
       I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I cannot
believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence", lol, a bunch of idiots.
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html >>>
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
        Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
        First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were >> apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
        Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in H.naledi
and H.floresiensis.
        I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I
cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence",
lol, a bunch of idiots.
       I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they accept
the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about them?
Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression on them,
or is the brain washing they went through their schooling everything
that their brain can accept?
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html >>>>
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
        Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
        First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were >>> apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
        Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in
H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
        I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I >>> cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence",
lol, a bunch of idiots.
        I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they
accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about
them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression
on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling
everything that their brain can accept?
       Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...":
- multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
       May god.
On 3.1.2022. 18:51, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html >>>>>
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were
apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in
H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I
cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence",
lol, a bunch of idiots.
I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they
accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about
them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression
on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling
everything that their brain can accept?
Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...":
- multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
May god.
And then those bunch of idiots are producing this *vapourware*, a fog,
one after the other.
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:55:27 +0100, Mario Petrinovic <mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr> wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:51, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
        Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
        First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were
apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
        Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in >>>>> H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
        I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I >>>>> cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence", >>>>> lol, a bunch of idiots.
        I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they >>>> accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about >>>> them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression
on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling
everything that their brain can accept?
       Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...":
- multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
       May god.
And then those bunch of idiots are producing this *vapourware*, a fog,
one after the other.
Are you done?
Go outside and get some fresh air.
On Monday 3 January 2022 at 12:57:33 UTC, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Does the full paper say anything more informative
or sensible than:
". . . it is not clear how the energy and time budgets of early human foragers and farmers shifted to accommodate expensive traits . . " ?
Are they claiming that early hominins farmed? Or
is that just misleading expression?
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
Don't know the context for this but, at least, the
clams don't run away. Go down at low tide, and
you don't even need to get wet.
On 3.1.2022. 19:09, Pandora wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:55:27 +0100, Mario Petrinovic
<mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr> wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:51, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were >>>>>> apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in
H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I
cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence", >>>>>> lol, a bunch of idiots.
I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they
accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about >>>>> them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression >>>>> on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling
everything that their brain can accept?
Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...":
- multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
May god.
And then those bunch of idiots are producing this *vapourware*, a fog,
one after the other.
Are you done?
Go outside and get some fresh air.
Hm, I don't understand why you are generally taking such a high
stance, when you are not on the level. Is following the views of the
majority the reason for you to take high stance?
I do like your contributions to this group, they are always
interesting. The problem is, your response to your own contribution is
pretty blunt.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 21:11:37 +0100, Mario Petrinovic <mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr> wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 19:09, Pandora wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:55:27 +0100, Mario Petrinovic
<mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr> wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:51, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
        Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy? >>>>>>>         First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were
apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
        Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in >>>>>>> H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
        I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I
cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence", >>>>>>> lol, a bunch of idiots.
        I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they
accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about >>>>>> them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression >>>>>> on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling >>>>>> everything that their brain can accept?
       Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...": >>>>> - multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
       May god.
And then those bunch of idiots are producing this *vapourware*, a fog,
one after the other.
Are you done?
Go outside and get some fresh air.
Hm, I don't understand why you are generally taking such a high >> stance, when you are not on the level. Is following the views of the
majority the reason for you to take high stance?
I do like your contributions to this group, they are always
interesting. The problem is, your response to your own contribution is
pretty blunt.
Yours is hysterical. You post 4 consecutive replies in little over 10
minutes and they're nothing but a rant.
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:55:27 +0100, Mario PetrinovicRanting aside...
<mario.pe...@zg.htnet.hr> wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:51, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:46, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 18:42, Mario Petrinovic wrote:
On 3.1.2022. 13:57, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
Why you are confining yourself to such idiocy?
First, it weren't humans that changed themselves, it were
apes who changed themselves. The LCA was human-like.
Second thing, this *didn't* lead to larger brains in
H.naledi and H.floresiensis.
I mean, this whole hypothesis is upside down, my god. I
cannot believe that I have greater knowledge than those stupid
scientists, with their stupid theses. So, they "found the evidence", >>>> lol, a bunch of idiots.
I mean, what those people were taught in school? Do they
accept the evidence from the last 30 years? Have they even heard about >>> them? Have they ever thought about them? Did it have *any* impression
on them, or is the brain washing they went through their schooling
everything that their brain can accept?
Lets see, "A team of researchers affiliated with...":
- multiple institutions in the U.S.
- the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, France
- the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany
May god.
And then those bunch of idiots are producing this *vapourware*, a fog,Are you done?
one after the other.
Go outside and get some fresh air.
On Monday 3 January 2022 at 12:57:33 UTC, Pandora wrote:
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-early-humans-gained-energy-acquisition.html
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf0130
Does the full paper say anything more informative
or sensible than:
". . . it is not clear how the energy and time budgets of early human foragers and farmers shifted to accommodate expensive traits . . " ?
Are they claiming that early hominins farmed? Or
is that just misleading expression?
Right, a kudu provides much more energy than a clam.
Don't know the context for this but, at least, the
clams don't run away. Go down at low tide, and
you don't even need to get wet.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 292 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 207:38:57 |
| Calls: | 6,618 |
| Files: | 12,168 |
| Messages: | 5,317,007 |