Scroll about 3/4 of the way down. https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/972xA6HiLwg/m/IewqLjxA1mAJ
"This is where I used the word snorkel: "Aquatic ape theory and fossil hominids" Med.Hypotheses 35:108-114, 1991: "While apes and australopiths (OH-62 included) have flat noses, all Homo specimens (ER-1470 included) show external noses (54,55). The Neandertal midface and piriform aperture strongly protruded ventrally (33,55,56). When the Moustier Neandertal was excavated (1908), the nostrils, which could still be discerned then, were situated at the top instead of underneath the nose as in H.sapiens (55)."
Op maandag 13 september 2021 om 07:30:26 UTC+2 schreef Primum Sapienti:
Scroll about 3/4 of the way down.
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/972xA6HiLwg/m/IewqLjxA1mAJ
"This is where I used the word snorkel: "Aquatic ape theory and fossil
hominids" Med.Hypotheses 35:108-114, 1991: "While apes and australopiths
(OH-62 included) have flat noses, all Homo specimens (ER-1470 included) show >> external noses (54,55). The Neandertal midface and piriform aperture
strongly protruded ventrally (33,55,56). When the Moustier Neandertal was
excavated (1908), the nostrils, which could still be discerned then, were
situated at the top instead of underneath the nose as in H.sapiens (55)."
OK, my little boy:
only complete imbeciles believe their ancestors evolved external noses to run antelopes to exhaustion.
What really happened is obvious, see comparative biology:
Nostrils at the top of the nose?
Some idiot who can't read:
Nostrils at the top of the nose?
LOL Nobody said "at".
Underside!
littor...@gmail.com wrote:Like a tenrec or kiwi?
Some idiot who can't read:
Nostrils at the top of the nose?
LOL Nobody said "at".You said "top" https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/972xA6HiLwg/m/IewqLjxA1mAJ
Underside!
"This is where I used the word snorkel: "Aquatic ape theory and fossil hominids" Med.Hypotheses 35:108-114, 1991: "While apes and australopiths (OH-62 included) have flat noses, all Homo specimens (ER-1470 included) show external noses (54,55). The Neandertal midface and piriform aperture
strongly protruded ventrally (33,55,56). When the Moustier Neandertal was excavated (1908), the nostrils, which could still be discerned then, were situated at the top instead of underneath the nose as in H.sapiens (55)."
Nostrils at the top of the nose?
Nobody said "at". Underside!
You said "top" https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/972xA6HiLwg/m/IewqLjxA1mAJ
Some idiot who can't read:
Nostrils at the top of the nose?
Nobody said "at". Underside!
You said "top"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.anthropology.paleo/c/972xA6HiLwg/m/IewqLjxA1mAJ
This is where I used the word snorkel:
"Aquatic ape theory and fossil hominids" Med.Hypotheses 35:108-114, 1991: "While apes and australopiths (OH-62 included) have flat noses, all Homo specimens (ER-1470 included) show external noses (54,55).
The Neandertal midface and piriform aperture strongly protruded ventrally (33,55,56).
When the Moustier Neandertal was excavated (1908), the nostrils, which could still be discerned then, were situated at the top instead of underneath the nose as in H.sapiens (55)."
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 214:59:13 |
Calls: | 6,619 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,168 |
Messages: | 5,317,489 |