• Best evidence for Out of Asia?

    From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 26 00:30:42 2021
    http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/2-1-million-year-old-stone-tools-china-06192.html

    They don't say it here but they actually spelled it out in
    a documentary I saw previously on Youtube, one that
    took on the Chinese & French perspective...

    https://youtu.be/hP75JnDwZ-o

    Americans aren't allowed to say this stuff.

    Anyhow, they speculated that the early human that left
    these tools were what gave rise to "Peking Man."

    They're also FURTHER AWAY from Africa than was the
    Homo georgicus BUT OLDER. So moving *away* from
    Africa they're getting older...

    But the real clincher here, and something they don't say
    in this cite but they did in the documentary, is that these
    are Entry Level or Base Level tools, forgetting their wording.
    That, tools evolved to this point so these people and their
    tool making first evolved elsewhere.

    Sundaland?

    That would make sense. It certainly is in keeping with the
    models I've put forward: Coastal Dispersal (Aquatic Ape)
    with populations periodically migrating into & adapting to
    inland locations...

    But something I've pointed out for a lot of years now:

    Out of Africa purity is only enforced in the west, primarily
    in the English speaking world, primarily in the U.S. China
    has never bought into it, if any of the world has, and the
    French here certainly imply something else...

    Personally I don't find "Out of Asia" any more compelling
    that Out of Africa. I think linear models are wrong. Period.
    But it is refreshing to at least see something other than
    OoA purity...




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/671306255488499712

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_l@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Sun Dec 26 05:53:27 2021
    On Sunday, December 26, 2021 at 3:30:43 AM UTC-5, I Envy JTEM wrote:
    http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/2-1-million-year-old-stone-tools-china-06192.html

    They don't say it here but they actually spelled it out in
    a documentary I saw previously on Youtube, one that
    took on the Chinese & French perspective...

    https://youtu.be/hP75JnDwZ-o

    Americans aren't allowed to say this stuff.

    Anyhow, they speculated that the early human that left
    these tools were what gave rise to "Peking Man."

    They're also FURTHER AWAY from Africa than was the
    Homo georgicus BUT OLDER. So moving *away* from
    Africa they're getting older...

    But the real clincher here, and something they don't say
    in this cite but they did in the documentary, is that these
    are Entry Level or Base Level tools, forgetting their wording.
    That, tools evolved to this point so these people and their
    tool making first evolved elsewhere.

    Sundaland?

    That would make sense. It certainly is in keeping with the
    models I've put forward: Coastal Dispersal (Aquatic Ape)
    with populations periodically migrating into & adapting to
    inland locations...

    But something I've pointed out for a lot of years now:

    Out of Africa purity is only enforced in the west, primarily
    in the English speaking world, primarily in the U.S. China
    has never bought into it, if any of the world has, and the
    French here certainly imply something else...

    Personally I don't find "Out of Asia" any more compelling
    that Out of Africa. I think linear models are wrong. Period.
    But it is refreshing to at least see something other than
    OoA purity...




    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/671306255488499712
    doze not tools doze rock.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 26 13:03:20 2021
    DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:

    doze not tools doze rock.

    As you are so atrociously stupid I can't pretend to be surprised that you
    took the two cites, merged the information between them, balanced them
    against the things I pointed out and then concluded "doze not tools doze
    rock."

    Once again, you're oblivious to the data in front of you, yet want people to believe you have "Insights" regarding events that transpired even millions
    of years ago...




    -- --

    https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to I Envy JTEM on Thu Jan 6 23:26:25 2022
    I Envy JTEM wrote:

    http://www.sci-news.com/archaeology/2-1-million-year-old-stone-tools-china-06192.html

    They don't say it here but they actually spelled it out in
    a documentary I saw previously on Youtube, one that
    took on the Chinese & French perspective...

    https://youtu.be/hP75JnDwZ-o

    Americans aren't allowed to say this stuff.

    Anyhow, they speculated that the early human that left
    these tools were what gave rise to "Peking Man."

    They're also FURTHER AWAY from Africa than was the
    Homo georgicus BUT OLDER. So moving *away* from
    Africa they're getting older...

    But the real clincher here, and something they don't say
    in this cite but they did in the documentary, is that these
    are Entry Level or Base Level tools, forgetting their wording.
    That, tools evolved to this point so these people and their
    tool making first evolved elsewhere.

    Are NOT!

    Sorry. They are saying that these are NOT base tools. That, they
    represent some lengthy development, prolonged adaptation.

    These are NOT Tools 1.0 here...

    THAT is what is truly fascinating.

    And makes one wonder if...

    Sundaland?

    If what they are finding in China is NOT Tools 1.0 then the
    tool making, the technology began elsewhere. And that does
    open the door to Sundaland.

    Look. Humans aren't "Out of Sundaland" and we're not (Out of
    Sundaland) because there were are least two catastrophic events
    that devastated the area. The first was one or more meteorites
    hitting the earth about 800,000 years ago and the second, of course,
    was Toba.

    Sundaland was Ground Zero for Toba...

    This is why Africa won.

    Europe (Eurasia) was the northern hemisphere, which takes the
    brunt of any climate upheaval (COOLING, idiots. The climate
    emergencies are all COOLING not any 1-degree-C-almost-in-like -a-century-and-a-half but sudden and prolonged COOLING).

    So Europe/Eurasia takes the brunt.

    The equator recovers the quickest and Sundaland was very well
    placed for such a recovery, except it was Ground Zero. Africa
    wasn't.

    And that's it.

    Some populations had pushed south, probably becoming sexually
    selected, with a quantity over quality breeding strategy, and then
    after climate upheavals they were able to rapidly bounce back and
    fill any voids left by the sudden die-offs.

    "The penis is mightier than the sword."




    -- --

    https://rumble.com/vqwxtc-the-worst-of-watch-this-volume-ii.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)