https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGllMHrkFLgwSrcbCXHhQjsCGrS

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 5.12.2021. 23:55, littor...@gmail.com wrote:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGllMHrkFLgwSrcbCXHhQjsCGrS

I don't have this service installed.

--
https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
human-evolution@googlegroups.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 8:22:54 PM UTC-5, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

On 5.12.2021. 23:55, littor...@gmail.com wrote:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGllMHrkFLgwSrcbCXHhQjsCGrS

I don't have this service installed.

--
https://groups.google.com/g/human-evolution
human-e...@googlegroups.com

It's just spam.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Actually, I don't believe that there are no fossils. The simplest, most conservative, safest assumption to make is that we have found
them. They simply don't look the way you expect/want them to look.

Take Denisovan for a model here. If Denisovan existed then we were
finding them all along. We've found their tools for certain. Probably
some of their bones. We just mistook them for erectus or something
else.

Given how wide spread Denisovan were, given the period of time they
would have existed for, we've dug up plenty were they had to be, and
it had to belong to them.

I think gorillas probably evolved from an upright walking common
ancestor and chimps certainly did.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/669795532019990528

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op maandag 6 december 2021 om 07:58:32 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:

Actually, I don't believe that there are no fossils. The simplest, most conservative, safest assumption to make is that we have found
them. They simply don't look the way you expect/want them to look.

Yes.
Anatomical comparisons are rather clear IMO (see e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers): -most E.African australopiths were closer relatives of Gorilla than of Homo or Pan,
-most S.African apiths were closer relatives of Pan than of Homo or Gorilla. AFAICS, schematically,
late-Pliocene gracile apiths avolved in parallel into early-Pleistocene robust apiths:
Praeanthropus afarensis->boisei in E.Africa // Australopithecus africanus->robustus in S.Africa.

Take Denisovan for a model here. If Denisovan existed then we were
finding them all along. We've found their tools for certain. Probably
some of their bones. We just mistook them for erectus or something
else.
Given how wide spread Denisovan were, given the period of time they
would have existed for, we've dug up plenty were they had to be, and
it had to belong to them.
I think gorillas probably evolved from an upright walking common
ancestor and chimps certainly did.

Yes, or rather from upright wading + vertically-climbing early apith-like ancestors in swamp forests,
google our Trends article "Aquarboreal Ancestors?",
or google illustrations at "bonobo wading" or "gorilla bai".

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Sorry, the link should be https://www.academia.edu/39908432/Two_incredible_Logical_Mistakes_in_Traditional_Paleo_Anthropology?email_work_card=interaction-paper

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)